Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1697991-the-wechsler-adult-intelligence-scale
https://studentshare.org/psychology/1697991-the-wechsler-adult-intelligence-scale.
And it’s, secondly, valuable that colleague mentions the revised additions for those tests (how MMPI became MMPI-2 etc.) even bringing the details about how original structures have changed. Information is useful, firstly for those practicing psychologists. However, the most valuable is colleague’s exploration how the described tests may be used in clinical and non-clinical practice. For example, colleague says, MMPI-2’s useful in hiring, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale - for a better learning at schools, the Strong Vocational Interest Blank – when seeking career opportunities.
It’s valuable information when taking into the account that many psychologists aren’t involved in a psychological practice directly. Cherry (2015) brings the statistics that about “75% of undergraduate degree in psychology work in a non-psychological fields” , but work in related fields including education, HR departments, and other kinds of management, marketing, social work. To my mind, to provide colleagues with brief, but full general information on different psychological tests while making a great stress on how those tests can actually be used, is generally a valuable idea.
Nowadays there’s a lot of information can be found on each of three described tests for those who needs a deeper testing description. Therefore, a specific perspective for posting should be found. To introduce readers competently with three different tests form the perspective of their usefulness is a smart approach when writing quite a short posting. However, this smart idea resonates with the stated topic. It’s the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory while colleague’s bringing more information on two other tests too.
Match between topic and the actual content commonly is a first thing to critique for any
...Download file to see next pages Read More