Flow State Results - Essay Example

There will be two groups, the first group of individuals will watch a flow-inducing video, whereas the second group will watch a neutral video. A further hypothesis will be tested, which is that females will tend to be better at creative tasks after the flow-inducing video compared to men. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996).The method used in this experiment entailed the following steps; the subject included 140 students -male =70 and female=70.the students were normal and therefore incidences of visual impairment or dyslexia were ruled out to avoid biased results. The students were randomly chosen from one of the universities in south wales and aged between 18-64 years.

The participants were also from different diverse ethnicity though having the same Western culture. Students in the ‘flow inducing’ sample watched the play station game ‘Flower’. The control group watched a neutral video on wildlife. Creativity was measured by conducting the Guildford AUT. The sample was requested to list dissimilar possible uses out of 2 of the 6 household items, options included shoes, paper clips, newspapers, buttons, and keys. Participants answered (AUT) and (VRT) questions before and after the video.

Their responses were collected and a flow state scale was administered in the form of a five-point Likert scale. The response was evaluated on the degree of agreeing or disagreeing with the five queries. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996).The research results show the validity of the hypothesis. The tabulated statistical mean and standard deviation of the flow state were 25.3357 and 5.49114 percent respectively. However, the alternative use that calculated mean and standard deviation was 32.1714 and 13.33516 respectively.

Correlation factors calculated through Pearson correlation regarding the flow state was 1 whereas that of au-total was -0.151. The Pearson correlation factor for the two determinants of creativity applied in the test clearly shows that the females that were engaged in the research showed enhanced creativity relative to the male gender. The use of such a video, therefore, impacts more flow states on females than males. The experiment, state flow indeed persuade creativity in both genders. Nevertheless, the degree of creativity induction in females is higher than that of males, hence more comprehensive creativity in the female gender. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996).