Recovery Management Paradigm - Research Paper Example

Recovery Management Paradigm Alcohol and drug disorders continue to be a significant health and social problems in the manyparts of the world, contributing immensely to the global burden of disease and the daily practice of primary care. It has for decades destroyed the lives of many young individuals around the world. Many among these cases are those individuals struggling with recovery from addictions of alcohol and drug abuse. A recent advancement in recovery-focused policies and recovery research is starting to have a positive impact in many countries including United States, with implications for how to attempt to resolve these real-time challenges (Vaillant, 2003). For instance, the families of the individuals coping with Alcohol and drug disorder, the recovery process can often appear like a step forward and two steps back. Normally, relapse is accepted as an inevitable stage in the disease of addiction. The reality is, however, that sustained or prolonged recovery – not relapse – should and can be a realistic objective for those dealing with Alcohol and drug disorder. The New Recovery Paradigm can be considered as the appropriate step towards assisting individuals struggling with this alcohol and substance abuse. It can be considered a the shift in treatment from the Acute technique to the Recovery Management approach and exactly how term engagement may raise the success rate for the recovery outcomes in this individuals. Recovery needs a paradigm shift in societal thinking as administrators, program managers, mental health researchers, service providers and consumers of various mental health services. Society must no longer feel individuals with addiction challenges as always being disabled (Sobell et al., 2000). They must, first of all, see individuals who experience these additions as human beings who can change to better times in their lives. And yet – recovery doesn’t always necessarily imply “cure.” It is a means of living positively in order to make the most out of life. The new paradigm for recovery can be considered by many as cost effective and the one that practically addresses concerns of individuals with problems of addiction. The significance of the new paradigm is that recovery includes the expected outcome of alcohol or drug use addiction treatment. There is sufficient evidence for its effectiveness or extensive instances of its present applications (Desena, 2005). The new paradigm for recovery is seen in this approach as a personal journey as opposed to a set outcome, and one that can involve bringing hope, supportive relationships, empowerment, a secure base and sense of self, social inclusion and meaning. This makes the level of care advocated by the American Society of Addiction Medicine relates to the recovery management paradigm in many ways (Desena, 2005). One of such relations is the recommendation that provider networks should never be so restrictive that patients such as alcohol and drug addicts seeking recovery have too few geographically accessible options. American Society of Addiction Medicine specifies this stating that it is common particularly when these individuals are seeking care for their substance-related disorder. American Society of Addiction Medicine likewise recommends that the same networks should never be so exclusionary that care by a properly knowledgeable physician or system of care is not practically available. These concerns by the society have been effectively addressed by the Recovery Management Paradigm. American Society of Addiction Medicine recommendations and the new paradigm for recovery correlates on the fact that both focuses on assisting the individuals with alcohol and drugs addiction managing the environment they recover in to ensure long term effectiveness of the recovery (Kelly & White, 2010). The key recommendations of American Society of Addiction Medicine are addressed` well and logically. The new paradigm for recovery also relates to American Society of Addiction Medicine recommendations as it is a concern with a system of long-term management care that depends on accountability and buy-in from a monitoring entity (Kelly & White, 2010). Many of solutions to alcohol and drug addiction problems are the ones that are with them and the environment they operate. The New Paradigm emphasizes on drawing strength and various strategies from the combined experience of others in recovery. This makes information regarding ongoing recovery management (ROSC) in the new paradigm very essential in the recovery process in individuals fighting with alcohol and drug addictions. ROSC in the new paradigm provides supports and focuses on various strategies that ensure alcohol and drug addiction is dealt with in totality (Kelly & White, 2010). This is made a success by education to the society at large. These goes a long way in preventing inappropriate substance use before reoccurs. Education in the long run increases individual’s awareness about the addiction. Cases of stigma and discrimination and these to a large extent are minimized by effectively drafting ROSC. Furthermore, through ROSC ensures an early intervention is provided for individuals at risk of developing substance use conditions. These is grounded on the idea that recovery follows various paths and the most import thing is understanding that recovery starts with the affected individual. Recovery management (ROSC) in the new paradigm aims at building on the strengths of affected individuals, their love ones, and society at large. It also focuses on achieving abstinence and enhancing health status, welfare and quality of life for individuals at risk of substance abuse addiction problems (Kelly & White, 2010). The new paradigm for recovery is not a totality new approach, and it integrates well with the individual, group, and family methods. The new paradigm for recovery is in line with various groups, individuals and family methods as it focuses on long term recovery of the affected individual. Furthermore, the family therapy and substance abuse treatment fields work closely together (Desena, 2005). The New Recovery Paradigm can be considered as the appropriate step towards assisting individuals struggling with this alcohol and substance abuse and that makes it integrate well with various individual, group, and family methods. The resources and insights in each discipline brings are focused towards integrating various forms of substance abuse treatment and family therapy. Furthermore, integrated strategies of treatment also minimize overlapping of services, deter a split between substance abuse treatment and therapy for family problems, and efficiently and effectively provide services to the affected individuals. Family therapists who ensure attainability of long term goals of the new paradigm for recovery, likewise, are well familiar with the managements of family methods of care (White et al., 2002). The new paradigm for recovery also ensures that the focus and the long term goals of the integrated methods are in line with the client’s needs. Furthermore, it is a system of long-term care management for alcohol and substance abuse that extends and enhances the benefits of various treatment programs. In conclusion, a new paradigm for recovery is an essential and sustainable path to assisting in the long-term recovery of individuals with alcohol and drug abuse. As the treatment and management of various forms of chronic illnesses, the new paradigm offers a system of management for individuals with alcohol and drug abuse. It relates to the level of care recommended by the American Society of Addiction Medicine in various ways as it focuses on individual based recovery. A monitoring contracts is drafted that is intended to assist the addict attain abstinence (White et al., 2002). The new paradigm is to enhance accountability by offering care management through monitoring in dealing with that first individual so as to reveal and sustain the second individual. The new paradigm integrates individual, group, and family methods as it based on idea that recovery starts from the individual affected and those close to them. References Top of Form Desena, J. A. (2005). Overcoming your alcohol, drug and recovery habits: an empowering alternative to AA and 12-step treatment. Tuscan., Arizona, See Sharp Press. Bottom of Form Top of Form Kelly, J. F., & White, W. L. (2010). Addiction recovery management theory, research and practice. Totowa, N.J., Humana. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10432284. Sobell, L. C., Ellingstad, T., & Sobell, M. B. (2000). Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: Methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions. Addiction, 95(5), 749-764. Vaillant, G. (2003). 60 year follow-up of alcoholic men. Addiction, 98(8), 1043-1051. White, W., Boyle, M. & Loveland, D. (2002). Alcoholism/addiction as a chronic disease: From rhetoric to clinical reality. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 20(3/4),107-130 Read More