People's Attitude towards Testing - Essay Example

Cultural Influence on Testing The melting pot as the term s is the manner through which different communities or rather people from different backgrounds get together and live harmoniously with each other without having any problems that may hinder both personal and communal development. Normally, these people get together seeking a common goal and many times, they succeed. The melting pot has its origin in the United States where people from different nationalities came together and started living a fulfilling life. The United States is one of the leading countries in development globally. This thus has people from different countries landing in the country to seek employment opportunities. Were it not for the melting pot, the country would n9ot have succeeded as people would often get into wrangles concerning their cultural beliefs. However, understanding that general development is more important than personal agendas is the factor that has seen the country succeeding. Many tests can be introduced that have the consequent of being applied in other areas in the world. One of the most important tests is the creation of documentaries that show the manner in which people of the United States live in unison despite the cultural differences. The documentary involves having people filming the lives of these Americans and later on submitting the film to different areas across the world. In third world countries, there are different communities that often get into fights and misunderstandings because of differences in agendas (Jacoby, 2009). When these communities review the documentary and made to understand the importance of living in unison, they get to change their attitudes towards each other and result in community development. This is a very important test to incorporate for it is cheap and is not much involving. A test initially developed for North can be used in the south by making very few changes. The reason is that the basics of these tests are the same and changing the attitude of the people is the major goal of the test. Faking is a common strategy used by people that seek to establish personal goals and achieve them. Communities and institutions criticize the strategy for it does not appreciate the concept of hard work. Many people incorporate faking in their lives which has the consequent effect of affecting the manner in which other people deem certain results. For example, if an institution in the business environment finds another company making more sales than it, it gets an incentive to fake some of its products by the creation of counterfeit goods just to ensure that its profit margin increases. When the commodity hits the market, many people are sure to purchase it. However, the feedback that the customers offer is very crucial in the success of the business. Many of the customers are not satisfied with the quality of the commodity and this is because counterfeit goods do not appeal to the actual needs of the customer. It is very easy to know when people are faking. For example, a person may offer a fake excuse that he or she is sick to avoid going to work. This is very common in the corporate environment. A boss may thus offer to take the particular employee to a hospital to get tested and consequently feel better. When they get to the hospital, various tests carried out on the assumed sick person and given the professionalism of the particular doctor, no diagnosis is made on the employee and thus he or she is caught as having faked. From the reading, Interviewing refers to a Subjective method, the author offers a vivid explanation of why the use of psychological testing is more effective while compared to the use of interviews. I find the explanation very informative from the fact that interviews are subject to biases where the person being questioned may fail to offer truthful answers due to some consequences that may come from the answers they give. Psychological tests are more effective as the person being analyzed does not have a margin of cheating in any way. The reason is that the tests normally notice the slightest changes in the behavior of people. The writer seems to have adequate knowledge in the field of psychology and this is from the manner in which he identifies the various functioning normally affected or rather noticed by these psychological tests. The writer states that the cognitive functioning is one of the functions identified. This means that the person carrying out the tests gets to identify the changes in the mental working of the person and can notice when the particular person is lying. Another factor that I found impressive about the reading is the example that the author offers. In the article, the author offers a prison scenario as an example. This is a very appealing scenario provided in the case of prisons, identifying the truth is very important for it enables one to understand the changes that rehabilitating the prisoner has made and also know whether there is a high likeability of the prisoner reoffending. The reading Objective Testing is another informative piece that offers crucial information to differentiate between objective testing and subjective testing. In the piece, the author states that objective testing is much fair while compared to objective testing and this is from the manner in which the person carrying out the tests reacts or rather responds to the answers offered by the people being tested. I find this to be true and this is because when carrying out objective testing, the person under scrutiny is offered a chance to express himself without any form of judgment coming from the person interviewing. The author further states that this strategy is best employed in the corporate environment where the employer has the ability to understand and address the needs of the employees. I find that had most employers taken up subjective testing as the means of identifying the needs of the employees, the companies would not succeed and this is because rather than addressing the needs of the employees, the employer would put what he deems necessary first which is a big corporate failure. Reference Jacoby, T. (2009). Reinventing the Melting Pot. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Read More