Prejudice Causes and Approach Theories - Essay Example

Prejudice Causes and Approach Theories Racism and prejudice is a lifetime human history that has affected the human behavior towards other humans. Racial prejudice may be a menacing moral, as well as, social pesticide towards various populations in the universe (Asch 545). Some of the racial prejudice features include; panic, fanaticism, division, isolation, discrimination, as well as, hatred. With the above features, the main and singular cause feature of racial prejudice is lack of knowledge. All human beings are associated with similar species, but are differentiated by races which are distinguished by hair color, quality, skin color, eye color, as well as, body structure and shape (Donald 133-141). Most people in the recent society get involved in mischievous behavior that believes in money buying delight. Several messages are evident right through Studs Terkels effective, where, a precise amendment that a good number of fundamental reoccurring messages can be assessed to contain a pride and dignity in a job that satisfies a person’s lifetime fervor (Sherwood 449-459). The association of words, as well as, images promotes a heave of emotions exposed to the reader; this therefore builds the message with reference to work and answers the question of why money can never make someone happy in a more clear way. The message portrayed by having a good job that a person feels to be more comfortable may be the best manner of having a happy life that can be expressed through text, as well as, visual expressions. Referring to the book, most of the people referred to attend work on a daily basis never had any passion concerning the job and contained diversified views than people who had a passion about their job (Crocker & Schwartz 379-386). The entire views and moods of the various interviews carried out that were based on the visual and textual associations was categorical to those who opposed them job passion and those who really enjoyed their job that were more cheery and easier to be read (Lyman 145-169). An example is Brett Hauser who hates his work and dreads from attending his job each single day. Bret complains about his job in various dimensions and articulates how much he hates the manner fellow workers are putting each other down and the manner his supervisor humiliates him for taking his break (Wills 245-271). The visuals articulated form his complain assists in depicting the type of hatred, as well as, negativity of the supermarkets where Bret works; this feature him as constantly unhappy face. Studs Terkel article on C.P. Ellis is an article that can assist one in understanding the main causes of prejudice. Terkel lets out a story of C.P Ellis who was an ex Klansmen who tried to prove to be not a racist. He was a white colored guy within a low income level who faced a variety of misfortunes during his life that led to him being one of the Ku Klux Klan associations. During several dealings in his life, makes him become conscious that races to not structure a person but a totally different person (Stewart & Hoult 274). This decisive consideration positively removes him from racism and even agrees to work together with Ann Atwater, a black woman working on a huge project. This variety of stories showing the real life may be assistance to each and everybody to consider and make a decision why other people become part of the racism or contain stains of prejudice towards other people. Several channels can be examined in C.P Ellis written by Studs Terkel, that it is easier to afford a role through money, or even family relation connections, as well as, the level of education. Without the above mentioned channels it is difficult to afford a role (Mason 7). Decisive thinking makes a person to be familiar with cultural myths and change the thinking to be able to foresee other people’s views that can reform them. It is therefore important to be a decisive thinker to be able to modify the cultural myths to be a positive philanthropic role in a society. The causes of prejudice by Vincent N. Parrillo seeks the psychological consequences of prejudice together with the sociological approaches of prejudice. Parrillo examines the sociologist Talcott Parson implication that in cooperation of a family, as well as, work-related arrangement can result to anxieties and insecurities that formulate frustration. The family and work related arrangements can be the results of a person’s redirection anger towards other people. Parrillo portrays three kinds of sociological approaches that may be the causes of prejudice: these include socialization, financial context, as well as, social norms (Kelman, Barclay 608-615). Parrillo articulates that socialization system; humans study the principles, attitudes, feelings and discernment of their own culture. An example that Parrillo provides is that of Jim Crow rules during the 80’s, where people grew using these rules involving economic contest ( Sherif, Harvey, White, Hood, Sherif 54-58). The idea behind these rules is the beliefs that whenever humans feel insecure, they tend to be much antagonistic and unsociable. Parrillo continues by stating that in case there is a case concerning job opportunity decline, bad stereotyping, prejudice, as well as, discrimination goes to a higher level. Social sources relate to the social environment like at home, school and work area that get influenced and passed along by family, friends, as well as culture. Inequality in society is the crucial concept of prejudice and the rules from which people interact such as, gender roles in a society that is a factor in the ways men and women represent (Gordon 13-14). Socialization within parents as well as, friends is a key influence on the level of prejudice. The emotional degree of prejudice may be the feeling that a certain group is more superior to others. Whereby, these feelings or emotions may depend on stereotypes that may be a cognitive degree that portrays an increased level of personal interaction. An action driven degree of prejudice may be described as either a positive or negative inclination to interact in a discriminatory way. Those people who harbor powerful emotions concerning their members of certain racial group can be contain a propensity to act for them or against them through being violent non violent behavior. Such people may also act in a manner that likely want to exempt certain members from their group. Most real life experience on the social or origin of prejudice is, in a personal tribe, where women are mostly affected. This is a power of a situation because this tribe gets influenced by who they are in the tribe thus, girls get to know their roles in the tribe are to cook and look after their husbands (Carl 301-310). Conclusion Motivation sources of prejudice are about, a frustration that is the mother of hostility, where people mainly express directly against competing groups, by favoritism as well as having the view that their group is superior to the rest of the competing groups. Like those with low self image are victims of prejudice. An example is like when an inferior country is playing football with a superior country, the inferior country has a low self esteem compared to the superior country who get highly motivated, and in the end, the superior country will dominate over the superior country in the football game (Parsons 298-322). Cognitive sources of prejudice can be classified either as social where people grouped on the basis of common attributes promoted by a distinct person in the group directed by having exaggerated proficient or inappropriate qualities, like when a person hope of getting victimized by prejudice, people as well as behavior and the other category can be in-group/out-group as well as out-group homogeneity effects that are about the similarity within characteristic of the out-group than in-group that is taking the perception of out-group members (Dollard 15-26). There is the theory that prejudice brought about by competition within groups for scarce resources, once a person gets categorized to be a member of a group, they begin to take on the characteristics of the group. An example is one related to a group that am registered to where we contribute money for our group savings, so there was this guy who could not contribute to the group savings because he needs all his money to support his family, and he was comparing himself as poor compared to the rest of the group members. From this story, we relate the guy from the theme of the power of the situation because he is influenced by who he thinks he is (poor) compare to his group mates (Kitano 23-31). Works Cited Carl, Hovland, Robert R. Sears. “Minor Studies of Aggression: Correlation of Lynchings with Economic Indices.” Journal of Psychology 9. (1940): 301-10.Print. Donald Young. Research Memorandum on Minority Peoples in the Depression. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1937. Print. Gordon W. Allport. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Weslcy, 1954. Print. Kitano, Harry H. L. Passive Discrimination in the Normal Person. Journal of So­cial Psychology 70, 1966. Print Crocker, Jennifer & Ian, Schwartz. "Prejudice and in group Favoritism in a Minimal" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1985: 379-86. Print. John Dollard. “Hostility and Fear in Social Life.” Social Forces 17 (1938): 15-26. Print. Kelman. H. C, Janet Barclay. "The F Scale as a Measure of Breadth of Perspective." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 7.3 (1963): 608-15. Print. Muzafcr Sherif, O. J. Harvey, B. Jack White, William Hood, Carolyn Sherif. Norman: University of Okla­homa Institute of Intergroup Relations (1961). Pp. 54-58. Philip Mason. Patterns of Dominance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970. Print. Pp. 7. Solomon E. Asch. Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: N.J. l'rentice-Hall, 1952. Print. Pp. 545. Stewart. D, & Hoult. T. "A Social-Psychological Theory of 'The Authoritarian Person¬ality." American Journal of Sociology, 2.1 (1963): 274. Print. Stanford M. Lyman. The Black American in Sociological Thought. New York: Putnam, 1972. Print. Sherwood. G. "Self-Serving Biases in Person Perception." Psychological Bulletin 90.2 (1981): 245-71. Print. Talcott Parsons. Certain Primary Sources and Patterns of Aggression in the Social Structure of die Western World. New York: Free Press, 1964. Print. Wills I. A. "Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology.” Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981): 245-71. Print. Read More