Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1606949-analyze-of-the-last-presidential-debates
https://studentshare.org/psychology/1606949-analyze-of-the-last-presidential-debates.
Analysis of the Last Presidential Debates In the last one month, the two presidential candi s, Democrat incumbent president Obama and republican contender Governor Mitt Romney engaged in some most aggressive debates. The two had intense arguments regarding foreign policies. Debates act as a crucial way of studying people’s personalities through their body language and language use. This essay is an analysis on the last presidential debate.The last presidential debate between Democrat incumbent President Barack Obama and the Republican candidate Governor Mitt Romney was on 22 October and was held in Lynn University was substantive as the two candidates tried to convince the voters to vote in their favor.
The two appeared compose as depicted by their eloquence. Each tried to strategize how to win the voters but it was evident that the two candidate reason differently. Bob Schieffer, who is a host on CBS, moderated the debate. The debate focused on foreign policies, which included the role of America in the world, Israel, and Iran issues, Rise of China, the recent changes in Middle East and Terrorism activities and the war between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The two candidates have very different ways of expressing themselves, which suggests that they think differently.
While Romney prefers using short concrete sentences, Obama tend to be more theoretical and make use of long sentences. Romney uses spatial words such as below, which makes his ideas more creative. Throughout the debate, Romney tried to blame Obama for his failure to implement policies that would make America a global icon in the 21st century1 As the two debated, it was clear that Romney deals with issue in a more personal way compared to Obama. As opposed to Romney, Obama sets up some context for his statements.
This was evident when the two addressed the issue of what they would do as commander in chief. Romney personalized his statements by using ‘I’ throughout his explanations. Use of ‘I’ depicts self-reflection, which is a sign of authenticity. While Obama addressed issues from a broader context, Romney was direct to the point and explained his statement later. This demonstrates their difference in decision-making strategies. Obama is a contextual thinker who addresses a problem from different perspectives.
Romney appeared more of a categorical thinker likely to make decision from existing values. This was evident from Romney’s claim that North Korea ought to be America’s ally because it possessed nuclear power. However, Romney appeared indecisive in the way he agreed with most of what Obama said without supporting it further.On the issue regarding issue regarding Middle East, Romney argued that US required empowering the Muslim world to oppose extremism. He argued that American intrusion into Pakistan in pursuit of Osama was unnecessary.
Obama criticized Romney’s comments and argued that his governance would protect Israel and the religious minorities in Middle East in addition to protecting women and improving the economic status. This demonstrated that Obama regards social relationships as opposed to Romney who is more focus on achievement. Obama appeared more concerned on how different issues affected people socially. On the contrary, Romney was more concerned on the economic effects, which showed he is business minded and less sociable.
The framing of their sentences showed their difference on how they regard human nature. 2.Additionally, Romney felt that American influence was declining which he attributed to the weakening US economy. When explaining his statement, Romney appeared defensive as oppose to the assertive Obama. In turn, Obama stressed on the efforts that his government is making to improve education and enable growth in small businesses. Obama appeared optimistic when he claimed that his government would focus more on guarding its territories by building a strong military.
Romney, argued that his government would do all it takes to make America safe. Throughout the debate, Romney appeared less ideological since he was more concerned on criticizing Obamas ideas than expressing his own3. Throughout the debate, it was clear that personalities are fixed. The two candidates used similar approach while addressing different issues.BibliographyLuciano, Michael. "Presidential Debate Highlights: Full Analysis of Foreign Policy Debate." Policymic, Oct 23, 2012: Online:http://www.policymic.com/articles/16951/watch-presidential-debate-online-preview-and-live-stream-of-last-presidential-debate-2012.
Read More