Assessing Personality - Essay Example

Assessing personality Major Categories of Personality Measures of the Category of Personality MeasuresIdentify a specific assessment in each category of personality measure (or process of assessment). Myers-BriggsThis assessment approach entails responding to the already set questions, which normally aids in establishing an individual’s tendencies within the four categories (Daisley, 2011). These four categories comprise of;Favorite world: Extroversion (E) or Introversion (I) Information: Sensing (S) or Intuition (I)Decisions: Thinking (T) or Feeling (F) Structure: Judging (J) or Perceiving (P) An individual’s response prompts his character assigned to a particular group encompassing of various traits, which is his/her Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (Daisley, 2011).

For illustration, suppose a person’s dominant traits are extroversion, sensing, thinking and judging, then the MBTI’s is ESTJ. This approach normally has 16 diverse options that constitute Myers-Briggs model. Primarily, these options almost best describe each test taker’s personality with heightened accuracy. However, due to humanity’ complexity its may sometimes fail to offer full description of the intended personality (Daisley, 2011). Myers-Briggs’ model comprises of a table bearing 16 options with the initials of an already established traits.

MBTI Type Description 1ISTJThe Duty Fulfillers 2ESTJThe Guardians 3ISFJThe Nurturers 4ESFJ The Caregivers 5STP The Mechanics 6ESTP The Doers 7ESFP The Performers 8ISFP The Artists 9ENTJ The Executives 10INTJ The Scientists 11ENTP The Visionaries 12INTP The Thinkers 13ENFJ The Givers 14INFJ The Protectors15ENFP The Inspirers 16INFP The Idealists Big Five assessment This approach mainly utilizes five categories contrary to Myers-Briggs and its assessment entails scrutinizing an individual’s conduct (Thalmayer et al. 2011). However, since its invention to date, studies contend that specialists have extended its coverage to include details after identifying an individual’s conduct.

These categories encompass,Openness Contentiousness Extroversion Agreeableness Neuroticism Big Five’s approach normally has a scale having a range of 0 to 100 where a test taker can adequately compare his score with the already set range (Thalmayer et al. 2011). Contrary, Myers-Briggs’ emphasis aims at fine details such as the age of the test taker. The broad categorization of the personalities entails; Five Personality categoryLow ScoreHigh ScoreOpennessConventional Original ContentiousnessDisorganized Reliable ExtraversionReserved Social AgreeablenessForgiving Critical NeuroticismCalm Insecure Six Factor Personality Questionnaire (SFPQ)It is an adult personality measure mainly applicable in working setting or during counseling sessions.

Primarily, this extends the popular Big 5 approach to augment its reliability and validity (Thalmayer et al. 2011). SFPQ approach basis its argument on dividing Contentiousness scale into Industriousness and Methodicalness. This helps in covering of more detailed aspects of human behavior contrary to the “Big 5” (Thalmayer et al. 2011).Do you think it is really possible to accurately measure someone’s personality? Why or why not?Besides the established approaches meant for determining an individual’s personality, humanity due to diverse aspects especially the environment, thus yield to be complex.

Hence, the approaches fail in defining exactly one’s character or yield to erroneous results. What factors might influence the outcome of a personality assessment?Diverse levels of the five “Big 5” aspects that might lack adequate criterion to gauge and label them as necessitated (Thalmayer et al. 2011). NeuroticismExtroversionOpennessAgreeablenessConscientiousness ReferencesDaisley, R. J. (2011). Considering personality type in adult learning: Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in instructor preparation at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Performance Improvement, 50(2), 15-24. doi:10.1002/pfi.20196 Thalmayer et al. (2011). Comparative validity of Brief to Medium-Length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995-1009