Comparing Interviews - Research Paper Example

Comparing Interviews Comparing Interviews When comparing Dr. Allen Ivey’s interview methods with the use of conventional methods of interviewing, it is evident that Ivey uses a more in-depth method of interviewing a person. His means of interviewing is crucial on discovering several psychological aspects of an individual’s cognitive thinking, which is very different from the simplistic method of interviewing.When carrying out a interview, I realized that my method was poor when it comes to answering a number of questions that served to provide a basic conclusion as to the objective of the interview.

In the case of Dr Allen, his method is similar, but he seeks to establish several other factors that constitute an individual’s thinking process. Ivey delves into deeper elements that cause particular responses to questions. (Ivey, 2009)His interview methods delve into the nature of human thinking, which is influenced by a micro skills hierarchy. The basic interview sequence is helpful on revealing four aspects of a listening sequence. They include reflection of feeling, use of summary, observation skills and response to questions.

This was the intent of my interview. Dr. Allen’s measures delve further into the nature of the interviewee. In Ivey’s case, he is focused on understanding the aspects such as influences by multicultural experiences, the reflection of meaning, level of focus, confrontation aspect, influential skills and establishing personal styles. These elements are part of establishing the ideal definition of an individual’s personality.In ordinary interviews, the focus dwells on establishing the general elements that an individual prefers.

Therefore, the interviews are based on establishing preferences and their effect on an individual’s decision-making and persona. In comparison to Ivey’s interview methods, it is basic data that require elaboration.Ivey’s methods are more detailed, and they serve to provide a more broad understanding of an individual and discovering whether his/her cognitive thinking is a foundation of the personality. Based on the various micro skills that Ivey’s interview method entails, he can establish a full understanding of an individual.

Ivey can establish why a person will do a certain action and disregard others (Ivey, 2009). The interview tool is an element that can establish and reveal the complex factors that influence cognitive thinking.Using Ivey’s interview method, an individual can establish theories that can be used as a guide in revealing the character of a person and what defines their personality. In the case of the listening sequence interview, a person can be limited by what they perceive and create an analysis of an individual based on a biased evaluation.

The basic measures are not enough to provide the ideal understanding of an opinion of a person (Ivey, 2009). The interview will not establish why a person gave that answer, what was the reason he/she chose it and not the other, why the interviewee is not moved or affected by the questions. These factors are not addressed by using a basic listening sequence. In conclusion, Dr. Allen Ivey’s interview method is far superior to the basic listening sequence. The latter is flawed due to the lack of essential micro skills that are fundamental in interview assessment. Dr. Allen provides a broader interview strategy that delves into the factors that influence the response of individuals to question, and eventually revealing the true nature of an individual.

The data can even be used for further referencing regarding the nature of the interviewee. Reference:Ivey, A. E. (2009). International Interviewing and Counseling. University of South Florida. 2 Feb. 2012.