Article Review - Research Paper Example

The literature gives a foundation for empirical proof for treatment. The literature also gives recommendations for management of Autism Spectrum Disorders. First, it advocates for a better methodological techniques search as the control group studies. This will strengthen the evidence quality. It also asserts that a direct association of methods of treatment for clinically essential result variable would help professionals choose adequate treatment for people with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Finally, it states that research should progress to the stage of cost effectiveness assessment, at least for interventions with data supported efficiency (Brunner & Seung, 2009).

This will help guide judgments concerning the private and public allotment of money towards management of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Findings show that empirical support has been got for the usefulness of a number of methods, whereas additional techniques stay at the beginning phase of the investigation. Studies give a measure of backing for utilizing naturalistic behavioral intervention techniques to tutor skills relating to communication, for example, turn taking, joint attention, spontaneous verbalization, and symbolic play to young people with autism.

Present findings give support for the efficiency of parent based developmental techniques. The proof concerning social skills interventions is still at the initial phases of investigation compared to Robey’s scheme. Question a I am confident the findings of the research. There were no critical faults during the study. All the findings from the study are clinically appropriate and may be essential for health professional working with young individuals suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Firstly, siblings and peer may be as adequate as models of target behavior when associated with educational instructors (Brunner & Seung, 2009). Moreover, assessment of pretreatment features of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders may result in more adequate decisions concerning treatment. We may concentrate on functional objectives or consider different treatment techniques instead subjecting children with physical problems. It is still not clear if the improvements show actual understanding of skills for children who undergo pretreatment language capabilities and a lack of symptom failure after ABA intervention.

Question b The study does not include other individuals who are not part of the investigation. The study members only include young people with Autism Spectrum Disorders. The articles documented in this study also consider children suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorders (Brunner & Seung, 2009). The study looks at the language, prelinguistic techniques or social, pragmatic results for children. The study looks at children suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorders and treatment falling into utilizing naturalistic behavioral intervention techniques to tutor skills relating to communication, for example, turn taking, joint attention, spontaneous verbalization, and symbolic play to young people with autism.

The research also incorporates only the most sufficient proof for every category of intervention and phase of research on the basis of five-phase model by Robey for result research. This study is restricted to a specific group of participants. Question c Ten years ago, the first documented review of researches assessing autism intervention stated that research had not attained the stage of