Effect of Positive Reinforcement on Motivation - Research Paper Example

These 30 employees were later randomly categorized into three groups a process we call random assignment. In random assignment, each employee has an equal chance of being included in any of the groups. This reduces biasness and thus making our results to be more accurate and hence reliable. One of the groups was to be used like a control group and in this group; the employees were not given any form of reward. In one of the remaining groups, the employees were given bonuses as a form of reward while in the remaining group they were awarded a trip to an interesting place.

After the two forms of reward, the employees’ performance was measures to determine how motivated employees were and the drive they had to accomplish their working goals. The resulting data was collected and recorded ready for analysis. Later this data was analyzed and interpreted to test our research hypothesis. Hypothesis Employees are more motivated when given positive reinforcements in form of rewards. Variables Independent variables: the two kinds of rewards given Dependent: the mean daily productivity of an employee in during a period of three days Procedure 1.

30 employees were randomly selected from a group of employees in an organization that deals with production of oranges. 2. The selected individuals were categorized into three different groups using random assignment of which one of the groups was a control group. 3. The experimental groups were given their rewards respective to the group each time they produced more than 80 Kg of oranges. 4. Their production was recorded for each time after giving the reward. 5. The resulting data was analyzed and interpreted to test the hypothesis.

Results Measurement examination Control group Group 1(trip to an interesting place) Group 2(reward in form of bonuses) After first reward 74 84 95 After second reward 72 82 91 After third reward 79 86 96 Mean 75 84 94 Discussion and analysis Before rewards were offered, workers had different levels of motivation, which is represented by the control group. As we see some workers really care about their productivity and they produce more than other even without motivation while other do not care at all about the much they produce.

As the experimental groups were given some form of reward, they had a greater motivation to produce more. The sharp increase in their performance after the rewards is an indication of an increased motivation. Their motivation increased because they knew that if they continue to produce more than 80 Kg they would continue to earn more and more rewards. The rewards act as incentives for workers to harvest more oranges. In this experiment, the independent variable is situation force since it contains external factors that are involved in motivation.

Due to these rewards the workers developed both approach motivation which is a motivation involved with striving to achieve a positive result and avoidance motivation that is a motivation involved with striving to avoid negative results. The control group, which was not given any form of reward, showed the lowest mean of 75 Kg compared with the other experimental groups. The second experimental group that was granted a trip to an interesting place as a reward had a mean of 84 Kg that is significantly larger that the mean of the control group but also significantly lower than the mean of the other group.

This proves