Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1438673-some-moral-minima
https://studentshare.org/psychology/1438673-some-moral-minima.
Therefore, this script will use some examples to explore the challenges discussed by Goodman on relativism. In addition, it will enlighten on the possibility of the existence of universal moral requirements. The genocide In her endeavor to address the issue of moral relativism, Lenn Goodman argued that some things are wrong. For instance, in her discussion, Goodman addresses the issue of genocide. She argues that the decision to conduct genocide is in itself wrong. In her discussion, she adhered to this belief since such an activity aims at destroying a particular culture, or a race.
In addition, it deems necessary to use the 2001 attacks observed in the US. In this terrorist attack a myriad of individuals lost lives (Goodman, 2010). The literature on the occurrences subsequent to the attack has indicated that, the US government decided to use gem in attacking the enemies. The gem warfare As observed from the past experience, those nations occupied in the gem warfare usually emerge victorious in the battle. Therefore, the US government believed that engaging in such a war would be the most appropriate activity to engage in.
According to Goodman, wholesale murder is also against the law. This is because many victims of the murder are without blemish. After, the September attacks that occurred in the 2001 in the New York City, a large proportion of individuals blamed the Muslims from the Middle East countries for the attack. After carefully searching for information explaining the attacks, it is manifest that different entities participated in this event. However, a large number of individuals believed that the Al-Qaida terrorist group was responsible for the attacks.
They also believed that, the event of bombing the towers was aimed at revenging against what the US government had done to them. The terrorism Although a large category of individuals termed the practice as necessary, it is evident that this action was against humanity. In her discussion, Goodman recommended the consideration of activities such as genocide and gem warfare immoral. This is due to its evil nature as individuals’ lives are terminated. However, Goodman argues that some times war can be allowed as long as its resultant effects are positive.
She supports her argument by articulating that weapons are just tools and thus depends on the activities you engage them with. She further focuses on terrorism in an effort to address the issue of relative morality (Goodman, 2010). She views the above act immoral since it breaks the values that it claims to protect. This is because many people shed blameless blood. Therefore, such an occurrence is wrong. An appropriate example on terrorism practice is the suicide bombers who are on the increase usually in the Middle East countries, such as Iraq and Iran.
The issue of suicide bombers extrapolates the issue of child warrior. However, under normal circumstances, it is clear that such an activity is wrong as people loose lives. Polygamy and slavery A different area of discussion that Goodman has dedicated her efforts towards is the issue of slavery, as well as polygamy. She regards them wrong since in the process of their execution, an individual’s rights are broken. Despite, the belief of many individuals that slavery ended, Goodman, states that both the children along with the women trafficking are on the rise thus the slavery.
Goodman does not justify the consideration
...Download file to see next pages Read More