Download file to see previous pages...
The concept of moral relativism stipulates that there is no sense in asking abstract questions concerning whether an act is either good or its bad. As per the theory, abstract questions that contain neither goodness nor badness in them. The concept stipulates that the issues of goodness and badness can only be found in contexts that are specified. Therefore, this implies that an action can be good for a certain individual but on the other hand be bad for another individual. It also suggests that certain acts may be correct in a certain cultural setting but considered to be bad in another cultural setting (Moral Relativism. Info). However, if the concept of moral relativism is considered true, an act should not be questioned on its goodness or badness in its abstract form but should only be questioned in particular situations. Different people view the issue of more relativism as being a palpable truth and undeniable whereas others perceive it as a threat to the ethical foundations upon which societies are built (Hammerlinck).
The concept of moral relativism has been supported with various proofs by different people. Some of them have put forward arguments from disagreements, flexibility and from tolerance. Those who have forwarded arguments from disagreements argue that ethical relativism best describes the fact that different cultures and individuals have different ethical beliefs. From this perception, the ethical disagreements demonstrate that the issue of morality is just but a product of our personal opinions or our different cultures. This is the exact claim that has been put forward by the notion of moral relativism (Moral Relativism. Info). Other arguments for the notion of moral relativism that have been presented from flexibility arguments stipulate that the issue of moral absolutism will certainly break down when exposed to particular situations.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Are there universal standards that permit us to learn about people and their opinions across the borders of cultural diversity? This paper examines a particular assumption which states that one can keep on challenging the argument that norms defending human rights, and opinions supporting freedom, are culturally particularistic and cannot perhaps possess any universal legitimacy.
Name: Instructor’s Name: Course: Date of Submission: Moral relativism Moral relativism is a philosophical theory that morality, principles, ethics are relative which are culturally dependent as well count on an individual’s choice. This morality is not absolute, it does not hold for all people at any place and it depends on time and situation too.
In the case of food taste, people tend to possess varied opinions concerning their favorite flavors and tastes. A specific example of food taste concerns the different ice cream flavors available in the market. These flavors were developed due to varying preferences among the society’s members.
These cases are examples of a social group or culture making a moral judgment on behavior. Morality seems to shift like quicksand as we travel from our inner social circles to larger cultural groups and the interacting people of the world. It is often on a continuum that has no set boundaries and no well defined rules.
Morality comes from the Latin word moralis - custom or manner." However, these both words narrate to the manners and customs leading the good qualities but still the difference lies by the psychological thoughts. As moral is the word psychologically relates to the heart and mind which makes them pure and clean.
theory in philosophy connotes that “there is no single true morality” because what is “moral right and wrong are always relative to a choice of moral framework” (Harman & Thomson, 1996). It has two forms, ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism (“Moral
Ethical egoism is further subdivided into three categories: Personal Ethical Egoism, Individual ethical egoism and Universal ethical egoism (Pojman & Fieser, 2011).
1) Personal Ethical Egoism: This is the belief that only I, the individual, should act
be based on seeing and analyzing the ethical or moral issue, generating the options for managing the ethical or moral issue, and finally evaluating the options given to solve the issue. This project has a lot of potential to deliver strong solutions of how to diminish the issues
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Moral relativism and Moral absolutism for FREE!