We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Water Weapons Officer - Assignment Example

Comments (0)
Summary
As the report stresses in the capacity of Above Water Weapons Officer (AWWO) in a frigate, one is made to remunerate on the statement relayed directly by the Captain regarding the supposed results of a live fire exercise. Actual results from the tug indicate a number of hits with some misses…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
Water Weapons Officer
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Water Weapons Officer

Download file to see previous pages... From this discussion it is clear that the Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics presented the types of ethical dilemma in three general categories: the uncertainty dilemma which is of general nature but where no clear indication of right and wrong could be simply inferred; competing obligations dilemma, as the term indicates, the number of courses of action and decision complicate the selection since most are consistent with differing ethical values and obligations; and harm dilemma is a difficult ethical situation where a course of action or decision would result to injury or harm.This essay declares that using the original scenario that needs to determine one’s decision in the capacity of an AWWO, the individual factors that could influence one’s decision lies into the following: “ego strength, field dependence and locus of control, are suggested to influence the likelihood of a person to act on the cognitions regarding what is ethical or unethical”. Individuals who are high on ego strength are said to resist impulses and follow their intuitions regarding what is right or wrong they are more likely to act on what they think is right or wrong – than those who are low on this measure. Individuals deemed to be field dependent are those who more typically refer to the guidance of others in determining what is right or wrong. The opposite of this, field independent, includes individuals who function with more autonomy than their counterparts....
To response to the question on moral grounds, one can use the readings from Lesson 11 stipulating that although “loyalty is a functional military necessity, which also implies the need for obedience... (where) most orders do not require blind obedience or instantaneous obedience... (and where) loyalty should be broadly based on personal integrity and trust” (PSE 402: Lesson 11, 2010, p. 4). Further, as emphasized in the same discourse, “although immediate obligation is to the chain of command, the highest obligation is to humanity at large” (PSE 402: Lesson 11, 2010, p. 6). In addition, another relevant point presented under Lesson 11 is Huntington’s discussion of justifying obedience versus disobedience, to wit: “Huntington is only referring to lawful orders. He does not imply that a subordinate is obligated to obey a clearly unlawful order” (PSE 402: Lesson 11, 201, p. 8). With the foregoing supporting statements, as AWWO, one should clearly disobey the Captain’s order (presuming scenario 2 that the Captain deliberately intends to report inaccurate results) due to unlawful order, which is contrary to moral grounds and disregards professionalism in terms of integrity and the obligation to uphold the highest standards of the military profession for the sake of humanity. When one decides to obey the order, which in the first place was unlawful, it would be a precursor for future orders that could be given and expected to be followed despite of being based on lies and immoral grounds. One should remain steadfast in adhereing to the values of truth, integrity, and honor above loyalty to unworthy and compromising cause. 2. Using the Statement of Defence Ethics in the Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics (2002), identify ethical ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Ethics
As indicated, “when the major engineering compartments begin to fill up with water, the large water-tight hatch must be closed quickly or the ship will sink with all hands aboard” (case facts, par. 1). Given this situation, three men were identified to be in the compartment trying to stop the flooding, and as the Commanding Officer (CO), one is faced with the dilemma of closing the hatch based on ethical theories.
10 Pages(2500 words)Assignment
Hezbollah: Terrorist Organization
It aims to liberate Jerusalem from the control of Israel, eliminate the state of Israel, wipe out Western influence in the Middle East, establish Shi’ite-centered form of government, and deliver offensive attacks to the US. To expand its influence and impact politically and militarily, it allies itself even to non- Shi’ites, such as the Christians, Sunnis and Druze.
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Case Study Introduction Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS) is one of the largest state agencies in the state of Maryland. It provides employment opportunities to around 12,000 employees with a budget of US$ 1.2 billion. It includes 27 establishments and 45 community supervision offices under its agencies.
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment
Water
That’s not to say that the water is safe and tasty everywhere in the U.S. but is this a reason to promote bottled water that causes so much harm to our environment? Going green has been the new world slogan. This is essential due to the
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Constitutional Law: Horton v. California
The warrant only outlined the proceeds of the robbery, and not weapons, although the weapons description was available. However, the officer came across weapons which were included in the police report in plain view and seized them, however, the officer
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
Law of Evidence: Search and Seizure
Probable Cause is reasonable belief level, based on expressed facts, that is essential to litigate an individual in civil court or to apprehend and impeach a person in criminal court. Standing is the right to file an appeal or a grievance under
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
Terry V.Ohio
mitted a misdemeanor or a felony in their sight (Zhang, 2014).  I purpose to candidly discuss this issue and the Bill of Rights pertaining this topic. Generally, law enforcers need to possess a warrant to conduct a search into a person’s home or personal effects. As enshrined
9 Pages(2250 words)Assignment
Fourth Admendment: Stop & Frisk
Reasonable suspicion is assessed based on the expected response of a rational officer under certain circumstances (Keenan, & Thomas, 2014). As such, any officer who reasonably believes that an individual might be a criminal
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
Assignment 12
al, 2009). There are certain indicators of suicide-by-cop, as every killing by legal officials, cannot be regarded as suicide-by-cop. The subjects who go for suicide-by-cop usually possess weapons whether it is a pistol, gun, or knife, but they have weapons. In addition to
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
Criminal Procedures - Week 2
Answering this question needs a reference to the first meaning of reasonable suspicion term. Given that it is in the nontechnical category, it has a strong interconnection with the probable cause. Probable cause means fair probability. In other words, probable
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Water Weapons Officer for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us