Annexation of Iraq by the United States of America - Essay Example

Casual Analysis of the Annexation of Iraq by the United States of America The United States is annexing several countries. These include Hawaii, Iran, Guatemala, Cuba and Iraq. The latter, the annexation of Iraq by the United States is causing tremendous effects on both countries. There are bloodsheds on most part of Iraq. The United States delegations in Iraq have been spending so much time in Iraq. There are more productive things to do than making war with Iraq. When the United States decided to annex Iraq through inclusion of this country from the Middle East within the sphere of influence or domain of the Uncle Sam’s country, several changes has been observed in both countries. Big countries, such as the European and the American, have intruded and occupied many nations. Majority of these countries are resisting annexation. It is said that the key reasons these super powers invasion, European and American, are economic and corporate reasons (Kinzer, 2003). Specifically, most, if not all, of the United States invasions as early as 1893 in Hawaii up to Iraq in 2003, has been the result of the United states corporations like sugar, oil, bananas and many other big corporations. The United States is currently experiencing both local and nationalistic pressures on the bottom line. This resulted in "Regime Change" military Operations, for the past one hundred thirteen years. This started from the then President Ben Harrison up to the current President George W. Bush, Jr. The intervention of this powerful country, the United States, in Iraq carries on several decades of antagonism between Washington and Baghdad (Bennis, 2003). The United States is rationalizing that their efforts in Iraq aims at reducing terrorism. But the irony in this case is that who is really terrorizing who? This intervention to Iraq is happening for a long time involving three United States administrations. Though the annexation of Iraq was not blatantly expressed, Iraq is resisting this invasion. It seems like they will not yield to the United States. They look like they will not give up without intense fights. They cannot accept the unsolicited intervention by the United States in their country.. The USA has set its eye on the Middle East since many decades ago. According to Jasim (2005), the interest to the Middle East countries significantly intensifies in the year 1980. This interest has increased after the Oil embargo of 1973 occured. The United States said that the widespread kidnappings, presence of weapons of mass destruction, rise of fundamentalism as well as turmoil triggered the United States to reassess its foreign policies. Likewise, the United States believe that there is a need to place the Middle East under direct military control after especially after the British finally left Iran. The United States considered a number of policy alternatives such as the Persian Gulf, Suez Canal, and the Northern Tier states. However, for them, the spot most acceptable to them was Saudi Arabia since it is very rich oil resources. Saudi Arabia is a hot spot for the United states since this country is strategically situated near the Persian Gulf. Likewise, the shipping lanes in this country will boost the United States commerce. But lately, it shows that military occupation in Iraq would provide the cover for the annexation of Iraq's oil by the United States. The operation “Desert Storm” which was announced as for the liberation of Kuwait, was in fact aimed at annexing Iraq. Through the “Dessert Storm”, the real objectives of the United States are to put up a military base in the Gulf area and a Central Command Headquarters and to maintain the status-quo in post cold-war era. Desert Storm, therefore, was launched as a means to protect United States strategic interests in the Region under the pretext of liberating Kuwait as per United Nations Resolution 678. Desert Storm resulted to expulsion of the Iraqi Army from Kuwait. Iraq was also deprived of fatal weapons. Its arsenals were reduced, rendering it incapable of intimidating and threatening its neighbors. During this time, the United States signed a military treaty with Kuwait and assumed the position of Guardian of Peace in the Middle East. The US annexation of Iraq looks like a grand plan. According to Whitaker and Harding (2003), this plan was spilled over in 2003 when there was some sort of disagreement within the upper level of the President George Bush, Jr.’s administration. The grand plan is a new government in Iraq that will consist of twenty-three ministries, This ministries is planned to be headed by an American. Every ministry will also have four Iraqi advisers appointed by the Americans. This plan will commence once the US has rule Iraq in the immediate aftermath of the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. In that same year, there exist influx of the United States dollars in Iraq. This resulted to heightened speculation that the two Iraqi currencies presently in circulation in that country will be replaced. The US explained that a new currency will be introduced to placate neighboring countries and critics who fear dollarization signals the annexation of Iraq. The current President, George W. Bush, has come up with the decision to divide Iraq into three sectors for restoration of civil administration, rebuilding a war-ravaged country and selected her as the ruler of the crucial central sector which includes Baghdad. Swarup (2003) believed that a war in Iraq will worsen the depressed state and poverty in some parts of the developing world. A war against Iraq is dangerous. In fact, it must be avoided. This is because a war in this are can bring chaos and calamity for the entire world. The effect of war will readily reach various countries. According to Swami (2003), Iraq is a country famous for crude nationalism, religious animosity and ethnic bitterness. This country is also capable of bringing environmental disaster for the entire region. Iraq’s capacity to effect chaos and unstableness was proven when the oil wells were set on fire in 1991. Every effort should be tried to avoid a war including bribing the Iraqis. Bribing will not be in terms of monetary gains but with goodwill, friendship and love (Swami, 2003). References Bennis, Phyllis. “Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis: A Primer”. Institute for Policy Studies, January 2003 Jasim, Khoshaba. “The United States and Iraq”. AINA, July 27, 2005. Kinzer, Stephen. (2006). “Over throw: America’s Century of Regime Change From Hawii to Iraq. Times Books. Swami, I.D. “America flaunts its military power too fast & with less foresight”. The Tribune, March 16, 2003. Swarup, Harihar. “All eyes on this dare-devil”. The Tribune, March 16, 2003. Whitaker, Brian and Harding, Luke. “US draws up secret plan to impose regime on Iraq”. Sulaimaniya, April 1, 2003. The Guardian Read More