Nobody downloaded yet

Nuclear Non-Proliferation - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The prevention of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and more specifically of nuclear weapons has long seen a key driver of United States foreign policy. However, various non-proliferation initiatives have only met with mixed success, as is evidently from the nuclear stand-off in the Korean Peninsula and the Iran nuclear imbroglio, not to mention Pakistan's clandestine proliferation network spearheaded by AQ Khan…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Nuclear Non-Proliferation"

Download file to see previous pages Many theories exist on the 'why' and 'how' of nuclear proliferation such as 'classical realism' and 'neo-realism' but what is generally accepted is that the locus is external in nature. As per Fry, "If a state bids for hegemony, other states willform an alliance to contain and deter the expansion-revisionist states" (Fry 3). This is based on the assumption that states seek to, "maximize their power in order to survive in a competitive international system," (Ogilvie-White 44). Hence, nations who see a perceived threat to their national interests or in extreme cases to their very existence (as in the caser of Israel) seek to acquire a nuclear deterrent since "security represents the intimate challenge to a states survival (Ogilvie-White, 45).
This theoretical debate is best exemplified by the arguments propounded by Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz in their book 'The Spread of Nuclear Weapons, A Debate' (New York: WW Norton and Company, 1995). This scholarly debate has two basic schools, one that views states as unitary, rational entities and the other which feels that proliferation occurs as an outcome of organizational interests. Both views have their merits and limitations as will be expanded upon. However, it is quite apparent that given existing geo-political realities, more and more states will seek to acquire nuclear weapon capabilities as a safeguard against nuclear blackmail.
The first school of thought, led by Kenneth Waltz are the proliferation 'optimists' in that they feel that nuclear proliferation is not necessarily a negative outcome, and that contrary to popular belief, it may even have contributed to world peace. According to this theory of 'rational deterrence', "once more than one state has acquired a second-strike capability, war between the nuclear armed states is unlikely to occur, due to the fact that mutual destruction is almost assured" (Waltz 1990, 734). Waltz argues that near parity in nuclear weapon capability leads to a reduced probability of armed conflict on account of the prohibitive costs of waging war; unacceptable levels of mutual destruction; and lesser chances of miscalculation by the political leadership, since the ramifications such miscalculation would be catastrophic. This theory certainly gains some credibility when one considers that there has been no all-out war between two nuclear powers.
However, Waltz qualifies this optimism by laying down certain pre-conditions that have to exist for stable deterrence. These are firstly, that "there should be no preventive war while a state is developing its nuclear capability; secondly, "both states must develop a sufficient second-strike force to retaliate if attacked first; and thirdly, "the nuclear arsenals must not be prone to unauthorized or accidental use" (Sagan and Waltz, 51). This position seems quite reasonable since nuclear wars are more likely in conditions of asymmetry, even though the asymmetry might be in terms of conventional military capability. It also reinforces the rationale of states seeking to acquire nuclear weapons capability in order to maintain the balance of power through nuclear deterrence. This would be particularly true of states which see themselves surrounded by inimical neighbors, as in the case of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Nuclear Non-Proliferation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Nuclear Non-Proliferation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Nuclear Non-Proliferation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Report on Disarmament: nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation

...carried out by Otto Frisch in 1939 (WNA, 2010). From that time on, the idea of harnessing the nuclear fission ranged the way from a tempting possibility to an alluring opportunity in both scientific laboratories and politicians’ cabinets, to eventually reach its notorious first practical application in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 (WNA, 2010). 1. Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation 1.1 Definitions and conceptions Nuclear weapons are beyond a shadow of a doubt the most dangerous weapons the human civilization has ever known, with an enormous potential for devastation and far-reaching implications for the life on earth (UNODA, n.d.). Apart from the...
33 Pages(8250 words)Essay

Japan's Stance on North Korean Nuclear Proliferation: Police Paper

...backed efforts for nuclear disarmament in the region, an active advocacy towards the construction of nuclear-free zones and diplomatic efforts via UN forum to pressurize North Korea to back off from its nuclear program. The nuclear program of North Korea dates back to the cold war era when research over nuclear proliferation began in cooperation with Soviet Union and China. However it wasn’t until 1980`s that uranium enrichment reactors were conceived. North Korea became party to the non proliferation treaty in 1985 though it was resistant on allowing IAEA inspections over the fissile materials. Later,...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper


...Proliferation Proliferation is rapid and almost uncontrolled increase of weapons of mass destruction. It’s normally done against the non-proliferation treaty, (NPT). The two countries known for proliferation are North Korea and Iran. There have been multilateral initiatives in an effort to appeal to North Korea to disown its nuclear ambitions. All these efforts have been fruitless so far, (Chinoy 90). North Korea joined the nuclear none-proliferation treaty in the year 1985. It completes its safeguards on the agreement with much delay in the year 1992, (Smith 20). In the year 1993, the inspectors from...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Nuclear proliferation in North Korea

...? Nuclear Proliferation in North Korea The risk of nuclear terrorism engaging radiological weapons has increased the possible risks on nuclear explosions. Importantly, considering the global statute, any application of nuclear weapons through an uprising unit could illustrate a severe infringement of the statutes of war. These statutes have remained forwarded to cope with non- governmental performers in global politics as per Article 3, similar to the four Geneva Principles of August 1949. Procedure 1 makes the statute regarding global conflict used in wars fought for self-protection versus rival profession and versus colonialist and ethnic regimes (Beres, 1994). In assessing the constitutionality of North Korea’s nuclear schedule... and...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Nuclear Proliferation

...Nuclear Proliferation Lecture The lecture of Jonathan Schell delivered in the was very insightful and thought provoking. In this lecture, he offered his reflections about the nuclear proliferation threat and commented on the new policy to control the proliferation. The remarkable point in his lecture was that he presented the nuclear proliferation as a global issue for which a consensus was required to solve it. Schell introduced the nuclear proliferation by comparing it with the global warming issue and said each of the issue was a global one which could only be solved through global...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

US Foreign Policy and Nuclear Proliferation

...US Foreign Policy and Nuclear Proliferation Since the beginning of the nuclear age, nuclear proliferation has become a problem for the United s.The superpower arms race between the US and the Soviet Union increased the possibility of nuclear war. By the early 1960s, the search for peaceful applications of nuclear energy had brought technological advances in nuclear reactors for the generation of electric power and had also increased the possibility of using such technologies for the development of nuclear weapons. The fear that came out of the possibility of a nuclear war...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Is President Obama’s nuclear non-proliferation policy realistic (Policy Brief)

...Is President Obama’s nuclear non-proliferation policy realistic? Section What is the issue? President Barack Obama has envisaged an innovative nuclear policy that can turn out to be realistic if nations around the world are cooperative for the greater good of mankind. Nuclear terrorism and nuclear proliferation are the two threats President Obama has emphasized the international community should act upon to avoid nuclear arms race, potential nuclear war and terror that could be of an unimaginable scale. The policy encourages nations to pledge to decrease nuclear weapons,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Nuclear Proliferation

... Proliferation Name Institution Introduction Nuclear proliferation is a term that was used to describe the spread of weapons of mass destruction. Over the years, many nations have tried to control this proliferation due to the fear of what might happen incase these nuclear weapon technologies fall into the wrong hands. This attempt to contain the spread of nuclear technologies began during the interwar period. The Kellogg- Briand Pact of 1928 was a treaty signed to bring to an end wars between countries in Europe. The International safeguards system has attempted to contain the spread of nuclear weaponry. Later in 1968, a treaty on Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons was signed to see... to it that there...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Are International institutions effective in solving collective Problems Case study of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and North Korea's Nuclear crisis

...Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty & the Role of International s: North Korean Nuclear Crisis Introduction: Soon after the end of World War II, the world had seen a glimpse of what the nuclear arsenal would bring to it; devastation, destruction and total annihilation. United States use of nuclear arms over Hiroshima and Nagasaki opened the eyes of the world and made it apparent that something had to be done on an international scale to truncate the use of nuclear armament as soon as possible. Therefore, by the end of 1945, US, UK and Canada proposed a formation of the International Atomic Energy commission (IAEC) that would...
12 Pages(3000 words)Research Paper

Nuclear proliferation

...Nuclear proliferation Introduction The spread of nuclear weapons is an important issue in world politics. The atomic drops on Japan in 1945 were significant for many reasons. They not only persuaded the Japanese to surrender in the Second World War, but also ushered in an era during which nuclear weapons became the principal means of maintaining international order. The issue of nuclear proliferation is a very important issue concerning world politics. The fear of such weapons and the catastrophic destruction they are capable of the debate of further proliferation or non-proliferation...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Nuclear Non-Proliferation for FREE!

Contact Us