This paper analyses Ban Ki-Moon's Leadership Style and states that Ban’s leadership style is somewhat acceptable to all major powers in the world. Before becoming the secretary general of United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon was South Korea’s foreign minister. He took charge from Kofi Anan in 2007 as the eighth secretary-general of United Nations. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Ban Ki-Moon's Leadership Style"
Download file to see previous pages
However, Ban seems to be silent on these issues. He is not at all asking United States or Israel to stop their massacres at different parts of the world. Critics of Ban believe that he is keeping a pro-American stand in his functioning. Ian William (2010) pointed out that in a speech delivered at 22nd Summit Conference of the League of Arab States held in Sirte, Libya on March 27, 2010, “Ban commented on issues related to the situation in Gaza and stated his support for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state” (Ban Ki-moon's Soft-Spoken Approach Belies His Straightforward Words, p.20). Even though Ban criticized some of the actions of Israel in this speech, he was keen to use only soft words to criticize Israel. In fact many people believe that he had no other way to avoid criticizing Israel in this meeting since the meeting was organized by Arab states. On the other hand, scholars such as Ian Williams believe that Ban is successfully handling some of the matters involved by Israel. He has pointed out that “Ban Ki-Moon's persuasion forced Israel to accept an international fact-finding inquiry into the Gaza flotilla assault”(Ban Ki-moon Engages Israeli Politicians, as Israel Remains Mum on Kosovo Precedent, p.19). Earlier, Israel was adamant in their approaches and they never accepted the offers to allow any international agencies to interfere in their matters. They never allowed any international agencies to enter Israel’s territories to conduct any enquiries. However, Ban was successful in persuading Israel to allow a neutral enquiry by an international body about Gaza flotilla assault. Schlesinger (2010) mentioned that America sidelined United Nations while dealing...
This paper deals with the major criticism labeled against Ban Ki-moon’s leadership is that “he appointed his own people and stamped his own priorities on the organization”. In other words, Ban was keen in appointing those people who are supporters of his policies. While appointing UN officials at various parts of the world or while posting UN peace keeping forces at different parts of the world, Ban gave more emphasize to preserve his interests. “He tries to cement his position a little wonkily through issues, with the world financial crisis sharing the top of the priority list with global warming”. Many people believe that Ban like to have one more term in UN secretary’s office and for that purpose he deliberately trying to gain support from all major powers.
Even though Ban is commanding respect from all the major powers in the world, he failed to command respect from some of the problematic countries. For example, it is reported that “Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who is facing international pressure to end a crackdown on anti-government protestors, is not taking the U.N. chief's phone calls”.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Because of the development of scientific management theories, leadership in hospitality industry has undergone tremendous changes in the last couple of decades. Situational leadership is adopted by many of the leaders in hospitality industry. It should be noted that the current UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon's leadership can be cited as the best example for situational leadership.
Kelly also worked in Southwest airline industry as the vice president finance and later as the executive before his appointments as the vice chairman and CEO of the corporation in 2004 (Mouawad, 2010). Kelly assumed his leadership t role as a chairman of the business in the midst of May 2008 and two months later as business executive (Mouawad, 2010).
Understanding of management theories and leadership styles is thus an important aspect of our career development and alignment with traits that enhance our professional standing as well as ability to influence
Researchers have examined leadership skills and abilities for several years. Nevertheless, there are two significant models. The primary one is a model developed by Robert Katz in 1955 (Achua & Lussier, 2009). The subsequent approach is suggested by
It is quite natural, because in Catherine’s personality, as well as in the image of Catherine’s Russia, there were incompatible lines: a sin and virtue, greatness and meanness, a subtlety of art taste and platitude, reasonable moderation of the educated Europeanism and
Because of the continuously increasing demand for nursing students, the local colleges and universities are now being challenged on how they can avoid the risk of nursing faculty staff shortage (American Association of Colleges of Nursing,
This is reiterated by Duin and Baer (2010, p.35), who state that Google’s “increasing prominence is a direct result of shared leadership”, which is shared an opportunity with millions of users who click through to access the company’s latest applications and resources.
This kind of leaders is more concerned with the growth of the team. However, this kind of leadership is almost similar to the inspirational leadership in most elements. Participation and engagement of everyone in decision making is very crucial in retaining and attraction of great people4 in business (Ciulla 179-181).
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the research paper on your topic
"Ban Ki-Moon's Leadership Style"
with a personal 20% discount.