The author examines Nigeria’s Position on the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict with the never-ending conflict between Palestine and Israel, where Nigeria has been one of the supporters to conduct peaceful settlements of the two countries. The country has always been pro-life and an advocate of peace…
Download file to see previous pages...
The General Assembly reiterated that it is always illegal to acquire a territory by use of force or any threat and found that Israel has been breaching the international law. The conflict between the two countries has been present for a long time, thus there is a need to settle the situation between the two. Without taking the side of the Palestine, the country supports the call for Israel to respect and honour its responsibilities and obligations in the international community. Nigeria encourages that both country will do everything to make peace in good faith. Palestine should also stop any act of dispute and violence and make peace. The two countries should make compromises to arrive at a suitable peace agreement (UNGA 10/10246). Until today, Nigeria has been very supportive of the Middle East peace process however, the country felt a little frustration regarding the progress of the negotiation. According to Kio Solomon Amieyeofori, the success of the negotiation was up to the concerned parties, Palestine and Israel. The country still supports the Road Map peace plan as the solution to the continuous conflict of the two countries. The country encourages stopping Israel’s settlement-related activities in East Jerusalem and West Bank and calls to freeze the militant attacks in Gaza.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Nigerias Position on the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1429486-position-statement-on-nigeria-attached-is-another
(Nigerias Position on the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict Essay)
“Nigerias Position on the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1429486-position-statement-on-nigeria-attached-is-another.
Over the years, there have been many attempts to broker a peace deal but have simply fallen through due to varied reasons. Both sides have also engaged in violent confrontations on many occasions including terrorist attacks that have resulted in the loss of over 15,000 lives.
The Israelis were long exiled as a punishment from God according to the Scriptures but little by little they rose to power discretely claiming the lands they once used to reside through undeniable means. The small community of Jews who were patriotic in their mission combined to form Jewish nationalism which came to be known as Zionism.
One reason is picking up a war with multiple countries at the same time. It has become a norm in these countries to blame America also for their local mishaps or unfortunate events. It is also believed that America has started wars with the Arab nation for oil.
The dispute needs to be resolved by developing consensus between the parties. Violence in both the countries needs to be brought to an end because it costs nothing but innocent human lives. In order to make the world safer and free from terrorism, the role of big powers and UNO is inevitable.
U.S. has undermined the peace process to help Israel by providing military assistance for further more conflict with Palestine. They have, however, increased threats for its national security. Therefore, tensions have been increased in the region, re-igniting previous fears and hatred of war.
In 2002, The Road map for Peace was developed by the four international agents: Russia, the USA, United Nations and European Union. This plan did not touch religious and ethical issues but proposed negotiations plan for conflict resolution. The most recent document concerning this conflict is the Arab-Peace Initiative developed by Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.
The conflict, as outlined in the preceding, can also be considered a collision between two different narratives. That is to say that there are two completely different Israeli and Palestinian accounts of this history. Political scientist, Marc Howard Ross, explains that these seemingly contradictory narratives are important for three main reasons.
Several solutions have been suggested for a permanent settlement of the issues in the region and the attempts to broker a two-state solution, which involves the creation of an independent Palestinian state and an independent Jewish state, have been seen as the most practical solution.
As such, the Palestinian Intifada may be defined as a social-political movement engaged in contentious politics for the purpose of bringing the Israeli occupation to an end. Given that the definitions of both intifada stages coincide, it may very well be assumed that the root causes and objects of both are similar.