This paper traces the development of the conflict and of peace negotiations between the PLO and Israel and attempts to find the reasons why the Oslo Peace Process of the 1990s failed to deliver the promise of a just and lasting peace between Israel and the PLO. …
Download file to see previous pages...
According to the research findings it can therefore be said that amongst the most important elements relative to international relations in the Middle East region following the Gulf War of 1991 was the peace process between the Arabs and Israel that was sponsored by America. The two main parties in the Arab Israeli conflict were Israel and Palestine. The main developments of the peace process were the Oslo Peace Accord, its implementation, the summit at Camp David and the re-escalation of violence. It is evident that the Oslo Peace Process was slated to fail from the beginning because under Likud’s leadership, Israel went back on its words relative to implementing its own obligations emanating from the deal. Upon reading the details of the accord it becomes clear that the Oslo Declarations of Principles never represented a strong foundation for peace between Israel and the PLO. It is widely believed that this happened because preferential treatment was given to Israel in the treaty. The US is said to have avoided playing an effective and impartial role in brokering the peace agreements. The Soviet Union was an ally of the Palestinians but it was a declining power during the period. The enormous support provided to Israel by the US makes it clearly evident that there was an imbalance of power that served as an obstacle in making the treaty and agreements successful. The paper also presents the main theoretical assumptions of neorealism....
optimize security by maximizing their own military, diplomatic and economic capabilities Peace and order is achieved after states are able to achieve balance of power by effecting deterrence and stable alliances The presence of a dominating state can lead to stability if that state is hegemonic in terms of identifying its self interests with the interests of the larger region or global system The modernization theory originated through the concept of functionalist sociology. It holds that all societies developed from traditional to modern conditions, in terms of transforming from simplistic, narrow and theocratic circumstances to complicated, public and secular forms of organization. It is known that societies undergo different stages of socio economic transformation whereby some manage to modernize faster in view of their interactions and association with modern societies of the west. The theory is applicable to the Middle East region in the context of some states being in a transitional stage towards modernism. The Postcolonial criticism approach is recent in having its origin in cultural studies. In fact it grew from analysis of the Middle East region as carried out by Edward Said (1978) through his influential work Orientalism, which related to the ways in which a distorted image was created about the Arabs by Europeans in justifying their colonial occupation in the region. This theory holds that politics in the Middle East Region was first characterized by struggle for power control by colonists, then by the super powers during the Cold War and subsequent to 1989, by the US alone. The arguments are based on the belief that nations in the Middle East are dependent or client states that act as agents of Western hegemony or national liberation groups striving to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Politics of the Contemporary Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1395724-politics-of-the-contemporary-middle-east
(Politics of the Contemporary Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
“Politics of the Contemporary Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1395724-politics-of-the-contemporary-middle-east.
Though the latter phrase may sound snobbish, the reality makes people of the world to ‘build’ their own happy life by their own efforts. Governments and politicians are discredited. On the example of vividly discussed current events in the Middle East and in the North Africa, the following research is focused on discussion of the reasons for such kind of social turmoil.
There has been a long-lasting conflict in the Middle Eastern Politics between the ideology of Arab nationalism and the ideology of Islamic revival, which has incongruously added fuel on to the burning fire in the politics of this region. Significantly, the ideology of Arab nationalism was developed in the 1950s and 60s under the leadership of Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt and the Ba’ath Parties of Syria and Iraq.
During the Great Cyrus’ reign, Persia dominated the Middle East for 200 years2. In the 7th century, the Sasasnian Empire dominated the Middle East until it was wiped out by Arab Muslims in 633 AD. Moreover, in 1508, the Shah Ismail I, the founder of the Safavid Empire in Iran, occupied Baghdad until he was defeated by Ottoman Sultan Selim in 15143.
In the modern times, these variables are further complicated by the vast oil reserves found in the Middle East. Control over the region, hence, is imperative for the West or any global power that is why it has endured successive foreign invasion and intervention in the past, which continues up to the present.
Zionism has contributed to the discrimination of Arab Israelis in Israel and its surrounding environments. Arab Israelis have been discriminated based on educational, economic and political basis on different occasions. Arabs living in Israel contribute to around 20% of the population in Israel and they are divided into different groups (Gilbert, 2005).
Colonized by the Ottoman Empire during the 17th century and much of the 18th centuries and during much of the 18th and 19th centuries by Britain and France, the Middle East has endured the reign of foreign influences affecting its modern day political realities.
This problem is analyzed and presented with zest and reason. The book presents these problems adequately and explains the origins of the problems and how they got developed though it does not look at providing any solution for the issues.
The author of the book is a journalist and has been a resident of the Middle East, able to speak Arabic fluently; was instrumental in reporting back to UK some of the major happenings in the history of that region; including Armenian Holocaust and the Iraqi war.
In terms of economics, the Middle East political scene is grounded oil production. The Middle East oil reserves can continue to supply more than 60 % of the world’s oil needs. The Persian Gulf oil reserves can deliver 62 percent of the