Theory of Knowledge - Essay Example

Theory of Knowledge (TOK) – Disagreement aids the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences in several ways Subject: January 16, 2013 Introduction Disagreements contribute to the pursuit of the knowledge. The research delves on the effect of disagreements to the pursuit of the theory of knowledge. The research delves on the relationship between disagreements on the natural and human sciences. The theory of knowledge shows that disagreements effectively augment the pursuit of knowledge theory on both the natural and human sciences. Body Disagreement has several ways of aiding the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences. C. Lewis’s pragmatism theory shows that the prior experiences add to the person’s current theory of knowledge status (Wilcox, 2004). In terms of sense perception, the individuals can use the sense of smell to prove that the restaurants served dish is popular. Kant espoused sense perception contributes to the pursuit of knowledge, in terms of the theory of knowledge (Dicker, 2004). The individuals will smell the food to determine whether the food is good for human consumption. A foul tasting smell will change the current unblemished knowledge that the restaurant always serves fresh food to its customers. The foul smell helps current and future customers of the restaurant’s pursuit of knowledge to avoid the irresponsible establish. However, a second group of restaurant customers may be given a different food item. The second group will inform the current and future customers that the restaurant serves mouth-watering delicious food. The second group adds knowledge to the current pursuit of knowledge that the restaurant does serve delicious food. Similarly, the current and future customers’ tasting of a McDonalds fast food chain’s fried chicken will add to the current pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences, in terms of consistency of the taste of the fast food chain’s food products. Some current and future customers’ complaints that the fried chicken tasted awful add to the current pursuit. Additionally, another group of McDonalds customers may proudly advertise that they love the taste of McDonalds Products. Consequently, the two opposing views will add to the other current and future customers’ knowledge of the quality of the McDonalds food service. The new knowledge will add to the McDonald’s current and future customers’ knowledge that McDonalds fastfood sometimes serves awful tasting fried chicken (Brien, 2006). Further, several individual’s observation of the teacher conducts the classroom discussion will add to new pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences, in terms of the teacher’s capacity to teach the subject matter. A handful of students may complain the teacher is too fast. The knowledge of the teacher’s fast teaching procedure is normally the complaint of students with slow learning capacities. A second group of students may complain that the teacher is too slow. The students who insist that the teacher speed up the class discussion are often classified as the students with above average intelligence quotients [IQs] (Evertson, 2006). Further, the reasons given by the different parties add to the pursuit of current and future individuals’ knowledge. Some students may have disagreements regarding the teachers’ fairness, in terms of computing the students’ grades. Some students can state the class valedictorian deserves his valedictory medal because he or she got the highest scores in the class tests. The comments of the above group of students add to the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences, in terms of the mental capacity of the class valedictorian (Evertson, 2006). Furthermore, another group of student may opine that the class valedictorian’s being the daughter of the school principal indicates that the teachers unfairly propped up the principal’s daughter in exchange for the principal’s favorable rating. The comments of the above second group of students add to the pursuit of knowledge. The new knowledge is in terms of the unfairness of the teachers and the principal’s computation of the students’ grades by falsely increasing the undeserving class valedictorian’s school grades (Suskie, 2010). In terms of service, the comments of several individuals will contribute to the knowledge regarding a product’s quality. One group of current customers will express their satisfaction with a particular grocery store’s services. One Broxbourne, United Kingdom grocery resident prefers to visit its nearby Tesco grocery retail branch because the company offers discounts. Another Holborn, London resident prefers the nearby J. Sainsbury PLC store because the company’s convenience store service is best. The diverse experiences of the four different customers will convince other individuals that each grocery chain has its own unique marketing strategy (Hartline, 2011). Emotional perceptions contribute to the knowledge regarding a person’s personality. Emotions affect the relationship between two persons, including spouses (Cummings, 2011). The husband filed a divorce because he saw his wife eating with an office mate at a nearby restaurant. The husband’s emotions indicated that the husband brands the wife as unfaithful. In reality, the wife’s does not have an affair. The wife’s mere having a restaurant dinner was just a simple business dinner, nothing more. The wife feels that the husband’s emotions of jealousy and anger are unfounded. The disagreement regarding the wife’s suspected affair breaks up the marriage, contributing to the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences that different persons have different interpretations of a single event, such as two persons having dinner together. Language perceptions play a role in the disagreement among individuals (Webb, 2007). One manager may insist that using the carrot management language will ensure the subordinates will meet prescribed benchmarks. Benchmarks include both quantity standards and quality standards. Under the carrot method, employees are rewarded for superior performance. Employees who meet or surpass the established benchmarks will be given rewards. Rewards included citations. Rewards also include salary increases and promotions. The carrot management language adds to the pursuit of knowledge (Gostick, 2007). On the other hand, another manager may insist that the company use stick management language. Under the stick language, the managers punish the employees for their substandard performance. Some employees may be fined for not meeting the company’s prescribed performance standards. Another employee may be terminated for repeated substandard production outputs. The implementation of the stick management language adds to the current pursuit of knowledge (Daft, 2009). Bertrand Russell insisted in his Principia Mathematica that one can use the best word to indicate the real intentions of the message sender (Eames, 2012). Disagreements in determining which company to invest will contribute to the pursuit of knowledge. Socrates insisted that theory of knowledge proposes that one person’s theory of knowledge is based on one’s personal experiences (Plato, 2003). The chartered accountant will look at the company’s financial reports as basis for investing in a chosen company. The accountant, a financial expert, proposes that it is best to invest in a company that has history of prior profits. The accountant will prescribe that a company that generates profits will contribute a return on the investors’ cash and other asset investments (Fabozzi, 2011). On the other hand, the economists will propose that the investor invest in a company that is within a profitable economic segment. For example, the economists will propose that the individual should invest in the food industry. One of the people’s basic needs is food. Consequently, restaurants will have more customers compared to companies that sell luxury cars such as a Porsche car or an Audi car. The economist will use the economic principle entitled supply theory. The supply theory states that as the price of goods increase (the car is higher than the price of food), the demand for the product decreases. Consequently, the economists’ different investment disagrees with the prior paragraph’s discussion that the accountant’s recommendation on how to choose which company to invest (Baumol, 2009). Further, the close relative of the investor may have a different investment recommendation. The relative of the investor will convince the investor to put his cash and other assets investments in the relative’s recommended investment prerogative. The investor will normally put more preference to the relative’s investment recommendation, when compared to the recommendation of a complete stranger. The investor’s preferring the relative’s recommendation clearly disagrees with the prior two paragraphs’ discussion on how to choose the best company to invest in. The disagreement as to which is the best company to invest in clearly contributes aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences (Melicher, 2011). Disagreements as to ethical standards contribute to the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences. Consequentialism ethics states that the end justifies the means. For example, the father can violate the “keep of the grass” rule to enter a garden. The father violates the same rule in order to get his child who has strayed into the forbidden grass area of a nature park (Trannsjo, 2008). On the other hand, another group of individuals will prioritise that ethical statutes should be implemented, without exception. The prioritization falls under deontology ethics. When the law says “do not enter”, everybody should obey. Additionally, the law should be implemented even if the end does not justify the means. Consequently, the father will be penalized for violating the same grass law. (Trannsjo, 2008). Conclusion Summarizing the above discussion, disagreements add to the present quantity and quality of the theory of knowledge. The research indicates several individuals have diverse perceptions of each theory of knowledge. The research shows that the theory of knowledge is composed of several diverse concepts. Evidently, disagreements effectively aid in the pursuit of knowledge theory in the natural and human sciences by adding the diverse contributions of the affected parties to the current theories of knowledge concepts. REFERENCES: Baumol, W. (2009). Macroeconomics Principles and Policy. New York: SouthWestern Press. Brien, D. O. (2006). An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. New York: Polity Press. Cummings, E. (2011). Marital Conflict and Children. New York: Guilford Press. Daft, R. (2009). Management. New York: Cengage Learning. Dicker, G. (2004). Kants Theory of Knowledge: An Analytical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eames, E. (2012). Bertrand Russells Theory of Knowledge. New York: Routledge . Evertson, C. (2006). Handbook of Classroom Management. New York: Routledge . Fabozzi, F. (2011). The Theory and Practice of Investment Management. New York: J. Wiley & Sons Press. Gostick, A. (2007). The Carrot Principle: How the Best Managers Recognition to Engage their People, Retain Talent, and Accelerate Performance . New York: Simon and Schuster. Hartline, M. (2011). Marketing Strategy. New York: SouthWestern Press. Melicher, R. (2011). Introduction to Finance. New York: J. Wiley & Sons . Plato. (2003). Platos Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetets and the Sophist. New York: Courier Dover. Suskie, L. (2010). Assessing Student Learning. New York: J. Wiley & Sons. Trannsjo, T. (2008). Understanding Ethics. London: Edinburgh Press. Webb, R. (2007). A Conflict of Paradigms: Social Epistemology and the Collapse of Literary Education. New York: Lexington Books. Read More