Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1697512-discussion-6
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1697512-discussion-6.
The opinion poll is generally conducted as an attempt to measure and depict some broader conclusions about its audience. The poll I found online is a representation of 1000 US citizens. I dare to think that 1000 people can be representative of the overall US population which is around 813 million. After careful research, I understand that collecting 1000 opinions is the standard for any poll which I found. I don't think a sample of 1000 people can be representative to form a general opinion on an important matter. And I do believe that very often polls are biased in terms of how the question is asked and what answers the interviewees have to choose from. The limited answer options in the poll may influence how people project their opinion and may produce biased results.
The hypothesis here is the statement that 2 people must have a karmic connection to meet after years of not seeing each other. One of the experiments to prove or disprove a hypothesis is for us to test it. It will be very difficult to test the above hypothesis. The karmic connection may or may not be true. It is not testable by its very nature. To form a good hypothesis one needs to make “an educated guess”, and not just produce a statement out of thin air. We can not make observations and draw scientific data to explain whether this hypothesis is correct. This is a pool statement and may be considered a speculation rather than a hypothesis.
Critical Thinking
11th Edition
by Brooke Noel Moore and Richard Parker
© 2015, McGraw-Hill Higher Education
Chapters 7 and 11
Read More