Can choose from three - Essay Example

According to Nagel, reductive arguments seek to explain a phenomenon in terms of objectivism hence it omits the essential of the conscious experience, which are subjective. Because of this, Nagel believes that the whole idea of objective does not add up or make sense. Nagel also believes that the conscious experience is about one’s interpretation and varies with people. It is like asking someone else what he or she thinks about something. In this case, one is entitled to say what he or she feels and whatever said is welcomed.

Therefore, it is valid for Nagel to argue that the conscious is interpreted in terms of subjectivism. It is not always possible for the majority to see or view a phenomenon like an identical twins; the differences must be embraced and accommodated. Nagel chose the example of a bat to validate his information because of many things. First, bats resemble man to some extent. Similarly, there are rhetorical elements in his choice of bats since they have a traditional reputation of being weird, and some have special senses that humankind do not have.

They are essential in persuading people that do not think others can reason the same way. Similarly, bats have experiences that man does not have. Hence, there is a limit to human understanding that makes consciousness very difficult to understand. It is also important to consider the situation and conditions of an organism that influences one’s consciousness. For example, Nagel argues that facts about what it is to be an organism conscious state is accessible only from certain points of view.

A dead human being no longer reasons because she or he does not have any point of view. Similarly, a drunken person has a different viewpoint from the way sober people reason. Although a drunken is also a human being, the conscious mind that reason is not supported by alcohol but influences it towards giving unwarranted reasoning. The logic that one gives determines consciousness and all that pertains to