Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1696670-abortion
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1696670-abortion.
This group also asserts that teenagers who become mothers (parents) have very grim prospects for the future and that abortion also importantly serves to reduce the crimes that stem from the need to provide for the child (and its mother) (Paley, 221).
Moreover, proponents of abortion observe that if medical technology reveals before birth that the child will be deformed or grow up to be sickly, abortion becomes handy in helping alleviate the pain of watching the child labor through a miserable life. However, abortion cannot be validated by such feeble arguments. Life begins at conception, and so abortion is akin to murder, which is punishable by law (Williams, 65). It is also unfair to kill an unborn child simply because life’s odds do not favor the parent(s).
If all expectant parents reasoned like this, most of us would not be alive today. Even so, adoption remains a fair option that gives both the parents and the child a chance at life. It is equally essential to note that rape and poverty are not valid reasons to terminate a pregnancy because abortion only punishes the child who has done absolutely nothing wrong and deserves a chance at life like the rest of us (Tushnet, 124). The problem is not the child (pregnancy) but rape, crime, unemployment, poor economies, and so on.
Furthermore, apart from the ageless mental scars obtained from abortion, such procedures can also render one infertile or cause cancer. This is not to mention the billions of women who have died after an abortion has gone wrong since time immemorial (Berlatsky, 78). Innately, all persons are capable of realizing the ills of abortion and rightly reckon that no amount of academic arguments can make it right.
Read More