Discussion Questions - Coursework Example

Insert Discussion Questions Lao Tzu posited the principle of inaction as the way to achieving all missions. The theory of inaction requires that one becomes composed in any environment he or she is in and deploy the least of effort in order to achieve natural, spontaneous progress (Soccio 32). In adopting the theory of inaction, Tzu may have been influenced by the fact that forced events in life normally are costlier in the sense that they often attract inordinately higher attention and resistance from enemies of progress.

As such, penetrating the hurdles on the way becomes more difficult that when the driver of an agenda is seen as less concerned. Saying anything at all is not doing something; one who says anything neither has control over what he says nor the consequences, most of which are normally negative. In light of this argument, saying anything means raising the eyebrows and counter-sayings or counter-actions along one’s path to a desired destination (Soccio 58). By advocating for inaction, it is fair to describe Asian philosophers as passive.

Asia is technically a closed society where open reactions to issues are highly unlikely. In Buddha, the Middle Path is the cure for suffering (Soccio 59). The Path requires the faithful to avoid either extremes of life which would keep them in indulgence or denial. Successful individuals do not yearn for endless satisfaction, and they refrain from painful scenarios either. In all these, ego is always the trigger of all the negative stimuli in the brain, and thus it is the basis of denial and suffering.

Tzu’s observation is accurate; Buddha’s approach to suffering ensures that adherents are always prepared to avoid suffering by staying away from extreme pleasures or overindulgence (Soccio 44). The approach can cure virtually all kinds of suffering because pain is often associated with both extremes. Works CitedSoccio Douglas. Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy. New York: Cengage Learning, 2012.