Evil and Omnipotence J. L. Mackie - Essay Example

Alternatively, his suggestions explore the diverse nature of approaching evil from a logical and empirical context instead of applying sentimentality. Mackie’s argument in his brilliant article Evil and Omnipotence describes evil as inconsistent with a belief in God. According to the author, evil thrives independently and this often necessitates several problems that are worth noting. For example, a belief in God interferes with the decisions that people make in their lives. Consequently, this causes humanity to solve their challenges using logical or scientific methodologies that are not connected to the finer details of evil.

Likewise, the existence of evil is fueled by the disbelief in God in terms of decisions and actions that individuals make to survive. Therefore, the inconsistency arises when good surpasses the power of evil in influencing belief systems. The idea that God does not exist equally dilutes the essence of the argument because most atheists assert the lack of rationality in a supreme being. God’s omnipotence, thus, is fallacious because evil cannot thrive if he is in control of the universe as explored by Mackie in his piece.

Alternatively, theological positions adopted by most believers allege that while God is good, evil is still present and is committed by human beings. Lack of correct propositions is other forms of illusions that make evil inconsistent because it does not acknowledge the universal good of reality. As a result, fallacies and ethics fail to meet the stipulated standards of ascertaining the consistency of good in society. Constituent propositions have also become negative in differentiating between good and evil while also affirming the belief in God (Mackie 201).

Overall, the universe only progresses both materially and spiritually because evil overcomes the complex patterns of the human freewill and the solution. The two options that Mackie discusses as possible solutions are the issue of unlimited