Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1613016-logic-and-science
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1613016-logic-and-science.
A scientific hypothesis is supposed to create some forecasts.
Karl Popper's strategy of disconfirmation can be used to test the above hypothesis using modus tokens, whereby it is assumed that this theory cannot be proved to be true, but it can be shown that the predictions it makes are false (Kenyon, 2009). Therefore, this implies that rather than trying to prove that the theory is true one will first try to falsify it so that if the projections are found to be true there is a strong ground to hold the theory true. Therefore, if it is tested in all ways for the objects not to hit the ground at the same time and they do, the hypothesis is a strong one. The strategy of disconfirmation will therefore be applied to test whether the theory is true by critical testing, which tries to falsify the hypothesis whereby if the predictions are not true the theory automatically becomes false.
Karl Popper's strategy of disconfirmation strategy is the best as it offers a way of strengthening the hypothesis because various ways are used to show that the hypothesis is false but they all fail because it holds predictions, which can be tested, and falsifying it does not change the predictions.