Merits and Demerits of Kantian Ethics versus Utilitarianism - Essay Example

On the other hand, according to Roderick (part 4), utilitarianism is based on social hedonism. It notes that people should always act to ensure maximum happiness to the greatest number. Therefore, while Kantian ethics are based on an individual, utilitarianism is based on the greater social setting. Both theories have their merits and demerits.
According to Roderick (part 5), Kantian ethics are empty content. This is because it is dependent on what an individual is willing to will. Utilitarianism too has a problem. The theory seems to infringe on our sense of justice. Also, the two theories seem to ignore so many things in our lives including family, friends, special relations, and other relations that exist. The strong point of Kantian ethics is that they are based on fairness. For example, if executions are to be screened on television, then this might bring greater happiness since it will reduce crime. But, it is not fair to the individual or the individual’s family.