We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Response for Vygotsky - Essay Example

Comments (0)
In children, the zone of proximal development is the potential of actual development. This means if a child is taught through imitation or through collaboration, the capability of development is the zone of…
Download full paper
Response for Vygotsky
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Response for Vygotsky

Download file to see previous pages... Vygotsky suggests that Piaget is using adult thinking to solve a child’s actual thought process. Both views have merit to a degree, but Vygotsky’s view can help expand a child’s education from what is to what can be.
The zone of proximal development is the ability of the child to mimic or learn through group intervention. The zone of proximal development is the abilities the child can be taught. Vygotsky feels that the child should be judged on the level of zone proximal development. Vygotsky gave an example about two children being on the same level in actual development, but having a different zone of proximal development. Vygotsky asserts that children having a different zone of proximal development will not experience the same level of actual development.
Piaget does not agree with the zone of proximal development, but rather asserts that the test of actual development is the level a child should be judged by. Piaget feels current tests of actual development are the true measure of the child’s ability. Vygotsky’s method contends that the zone of proximal development is not just potential. For example, a child might mimic a simple behavior that they can grasp like a simple math problem. However, if an advanced mathematics was introduced, no matter how many times demonstrated, the child would not pick up the skill. The zone of proximal development is what a child can achieve with help, not impossible tasks beyond their level of development.
The zone of proximal development leads to actual development according to Vygotsky. His point of view is tests like Piaget uses only test the actual development, not the actual ability to develop or the rate of development. Learning and development are never on an equal basis. The development is either before or after learning. The two are not parallel in relation to each other.
Vygotsky also pointed out that animals do not have a zone of proximal ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Compare and Contrast Vygotsky, Piaget and Bruner
This paper compares and contrasts Vygotsky, Piaget and Bruner with respect to their study of knowledge acquisition. According to Piaget “whatever goes on in the head is organised in a way that parallels the organization of external behaviour. It is the set of relationships or the logic of the system, that get internalised, not just the behaviour”(Nuthall, 1997, p.21).
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Piaget and Vygotsky: Cognitive Development
After a brief introduction to the basic premises of Cognitive Development Theory, this paper will compare and contrast the approaches of Piaget and Vygotsky to intelligence and its developmental stages. Classroom applications will be considered. Not all cognitive development theories are alike, but they do share some basic premises.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Crisis In Higher Education. This is the title of the essay and the response is given in form of words. This is because it is written response giving a clear impression that it is not a response in form of action. In this response essay, I will give an answer to the writing strategy of the author, giving my own opinion of how his strategy is and the impact it has to the readers.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Piaget and Vygotsky
Their fame also emanates from immense contribution in the unveiling of scientific approach used in evaluating cognitive progress of a child. In Piaget’s premise of language development, he utilized structuralism together with cognitive growth to expound his argument concerning child’s development (Breseler, Cooper & Pamer, 2013).
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Position Paper - Vygotsky
He was a Russian psychologist interested in studying child development, eventually founding a new approach to education, today known as a ‘social
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Piaget and Vygotsky
Both Piaget and Vygotsky are a part of two diverse paradigms, that is, Piaget is a part of the constructivism paradigm that suggests learning as construction, while Vygotsky belongs to the
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Analyze Vygotsky with my activity
His theory places a great deal of emphasis on effective social interaction. Children value input from their environment and from others. This theory
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Lev S. Vygotsky's Sociohistorical School
Socio-historical psychology emerged as a response to Cartesian dualism between mind and body in psychology of those days, as a deliberate attempt to establish a new
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Piaget vs vygotsky -Theories of Cognative Development
As Piaget puts it, a child’s development is established through several stages, where a single stage symbolizes a qualitatively unique type of thinking. A child in the first stage has a dissimilar level of thinking with a
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
At times, the animals will wander outside the park center permitting the hunters to kill them. The farmers admire the hunters in light of the fact that the hunters shoot the buffalo before it can harm the farmers cattle
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Response for Vygotsky for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us