StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Some Mental States Are Not Identical to Any Brain State - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Some Mental States Are Not Identical to Any Brain State" discusses that Leibniz’s Law is associated with the principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles. It states that anything that is distinct is so different from other things and that no two objects can have shared their properties…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Some Mental States Are Not Identical to Any Brain State
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Some Mental States Are Not Identical to Any Brain State"

The paper provides a reason why that argument is valid and explains the resources the monist has at her disposal to undermine our confidence in the soundness of this argument. It also evaluates the response of a monist to the dualist argument that has been provided.

The argument for the claim that some mental states are not identical to any brain state is supported by various premises. First, phenomenal properties can only reside in mental substances and not physical objects such as the brain. Second, physical bodies like the brain have spatial properties while minds do not have spatial properties. Third, a mind thinks while physical bodies such as the brain do not think. Fourth, a mind is known to exist with certainty while physical bodies like the brain lack that property. Therefore, in conclusion, some mental states are not identical to any brain state, and a mind is distinct from every physical state. 

This argument is valid because thinking about things involves intentionality, which is a property of nonphysical things (Mandik). For instance, a brain, which is purely physical, cannot think about things that do not exist in time and space. However, a mind can think about things that do not exist in time and space. Secondly, the brain cannot have intentionality because intentionality is very strange. People also think about things in the far future and distant past via their minds (Mandik). Therefore, a mind is distinct from every physical body, including the brain.

Secondly, physical bodies are known via senses, but these senses can be deceived (Mandik). Something that seems to exist may not exist, in real terms.  One cannot be wrong about the existence of his or her own mind. Minds are known to exist in certainty while physical objects may not be known to exist with certainty. Therefore, a mental state is known to exist with certainty while physical bodies such as the brain lack that property, and as such, a mind must be very distinct from every physical body, the brain include (Mandik).

However, this dualist argument is subject to rejection by proponents of alternatives to dualism such as monism. To undermine our confidence in the soundness of this argument, the monist has various resources at her disposal. First, monism rejects the premise of this dualist argument that the mind is immaterial. Therefore, the question goes, how can a mind, which is considered to be immaterial influence the physical brain (Seybold 89)? Also, how can a non-physical soul or mind affect a physical body, such as the brain (Seybold 90)?  Secondly, neuroscience states that the brain is clearly necessary for mental states to occur, but a particular mental state is not identical to a particular brain state. Consequently, some brain states must exist for the mental event to take place, but no particular brain state can be mapped onto the specific mental event in a one-to-one manner. Monists argue that mental activities emerge from the brain (Seybold 90).

Monism agrees with a dualism that the mind can, and does affect the brain or the body, but monists reject this argument because it is not explained how the mind can affect the body, if the body and mind are of two different substances, as required in dualism (Seybold 90). Therefore, it is impossible for the physical body to be moved by a mind, which is not part of the physical world, according to monism. It should also be noted that body processes such as thinking require energy and the mind, being not part of the physical world, does not have physical energy (Seybold 90).

As far as monism is concerned, there is only one kind of thing, which is physical. Eliminative monism states that the mind does not exist, and therefore, it is only the brain that exists. The mind is a historical concept, and it might be unnecessary, as shown by contemporary neuroscience (Seybold 90). Mental activities can be reduced to brain activity. Once, the brain state is known, there is nothing that remains to be discovered (Seybold 90). According to science, it is the brain that is necessary for mental events. Such mental events include thought, consciousness, reason and language to occur. The mind is what the brain does. Therefore, the mind is the brain in action, and nothing more. This means that the mind is the brain. Consequently, a particular type of mental state is identical to a particular type of brain state.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Provide an argument for the claim that (some) mental states are not Essay”, n.d.)
Provide an argument for the claim that (some) mental states are not Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1492162-provide-an-argument-for-the-claim-that-some-mental
(Provide an Argument for the Claim That (some) Mental States Are Not Essay)
Provide an Argument for the Claim That (some) Mental States Are Not Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1492162-provide-an-argument-for-the-claim-that-some-mental.
“Provide an Argument for the Claim That (some) Mental States Are Not Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1492162-provide-an-argument-for-the-claim-that-some-mental.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Some Mental States Are Not Identical to Any Brain State

The Identity of Minds and the Mental States

Logical behaviorism, as noted above, is the view that mental states are nothing but behaviors.... Accordingly, all mental states are believed to be behavioral dispositions, which may or may not be actualized.... The purpose of this essay "The Identity of Minds and the mental states" is to explore a concept that has been extensively mystified, i.... This view lends itself to two possible interpretations, which can be expressed in the following manner: first, that there really are no mental states to which mental terms are normally understood to refer to....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Provide an argument for the claim that (some) mental states are not identical to any brain state

Some mental states (beliefs) are not identical to any brain state The first argument being focused in this paper is the difference between mental and brain states.... 5), some mental states, like beliefs, are not identical or similar to any brain state.... Argumentative Essay Introduction There have been different philosophical theories about brain state and mental state.... brain state refers to the physiological condition of the brain or the nervous system, while the mental state refers to the pains, desires, thoughts, and beliefs....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Philosophy Token vs. Dualism or New Theory

n recognition of the mental states in relation to the brain, the Token Theory of mind upholds the analogy of realizations and supposes that the individual thought is identical with the individual brain state in which it corresponds.... The explanation seems to relay the idea that humans regardless of affiliation feel hunger and hunger is identical to a certain brain state.... Each mental state is said to be identical to an individual brain state without any categorization....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Argument rehearsal for multiple realizability of mental states (contra the identity theory)

f a mental state can be realized by more than one kind of physical state, then any one mental state is not strictly identical to any one physical state; This follows from property identity: if X = Y, you can't have X without Y, or Y without X.... What this also implies is pain is not identical to either one – you cannot have six bottles without having half a dozen.... Therefore, I ask myself the following question, is there valid reason to think that mental states are in fact multiply realizable?...
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Case for Mental State in Relation to the Normal Organic Brain and Non-organic Brain

In effect, different experts in the fields of philosophy and medicine will arrive at different deductions on the mental states of patients using different approaches.... In effect, different experts in the fields of philosophy and medicine will arrive at different deductions on the mental states of patients using different approaches.... Hence, it is my opinion that the patient has mental states since her behavior prior and after the accident is behavior that fits the description of being defined as normal....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Philosophy of the Mind: Aristotle and Schwartz

Aristotle is of the view that the soul is identical to the body and also inseparable from the body just like wax and seal and that the souls and minds are ways bodies are organized.... The soul (physical reality or brain) thus is the form of the body or the primary substance and the body is the matter of the soul.... Since the soul is inseparable from the body, Aristotle does not believe that the soul (brain) is eternal; rather, it perishes as the body perishes....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

A Mental State and a Human Brain

The first doctor claims that mental states are type-identical to states of the human brain and since the patient in our case lacks a normal brain, he cannot have mental states.... The hospitalized friend does not show a normal range of mental states, but she shows some mental states.... Doctor two said that the patient had some mental states since he could behave exactly like others but insisted that the patient did not have all of the mental states....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Relationship Between the Mind and the Brain

This work called "Relationship between the Mind and the brain" describes most of the body's functions, the possibility of the brain to be the key interpreter of the mind's content.... The author outlines the connection between mental and brain events on the basis of various articles, thoughts of scholars, and writers.... Numerous speculations have been advanced to clarify the relationship between what we call your mind and your brain....
7 Pages (1750 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us