Nobody downloaded yet

Philosophy of Law - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Philosophy of Law 1.) Dworkin used the example of Riggs v. Palmer to demonstrate the differences between rules and principles. Discuss these differences and how they were on display in Riggs v. Palmer. Dworkin has tried to identify the criteria on which laws and court decisions are based…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.9% of users find it useful
Philosophy of Law Essay
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Philosophy of Law"

Download file to see previous pages In this context, principles can be interpreted differently, under the influence of the personal perceptions of the individual involved, while no such option is available in the case of rules (Raitio 294). The differentiation between rules and principles is made clear when referring to their use by judges. Indeed, in such case, as Dworkin states, rules apply ‘in all or nothing fashion’ (Culver 144), meaning that a rule can either be applied in a specific case or not, there is no intermediate status (Culver 144). On the contrary, principles, even if judges use them, do not oblige the judge involved to take a specific decision. For this reason, Dworkin notes that principles only ‘contribute in judges’ decision’ (Culver 144); principles cannot define the content of a court decision just to influence the reasoning of the judge in regard to the case involved (Culver 144); also, the judge decides whether he will use a principle, and at what level, when developing a decision. Peczenik (2009) refers to another differentiation of rules and principles, as described by Dworkin. Rules and principles are based on different criteria of validity. ...
This means that principles cannot introduce ideas or set obligations, which are differentiated to the beliefs of individuals, at an average level, in regard to law and ethics. Also, principles cannot introduce ideas, which are in opposition with the statutes or the case law, as developed in the country involved (Peczenik 246). In legal rules, the existence of the above conditions is not examined. It is sufficient for a legal rule to have been verified by a competent institution, as explained above, in order to be considered as valid. The above terms of differentiation between rules and principles have been introduced by Dworkin and are valuable for understanding the conditions under which rules and principles are used in practice. The potential use of the view of Dworkin on rules and principles for explaining the decision of the court in the case Riggs v Palmer is examined in the study of Siltala (2000). According to the above researcher, the case Riggs v Palmer sets a critical dilemma: when, in the context of a case, a conflict is developed between a rule and a principle, which should be the decision of judge? He should uphold the rule or use the principle for developing a decision in regard to the specific case? In such cases, Dworkin ‘used to redefine the normative conflict’ (Siltala 46); in this way, ‘the weight of the two principles’ (Siltala 46) should be taken into consideration for deciding which of these principles should be preferred. The differences between legal rules and principles, as Dworkin has highlighted these differences, are clear in the case of Riggs v Palmer (1889). More specifically: in the above case, the following dilemma appears: ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Philosophy of Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Philosophy of Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Philosophy of Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy of Law Essay

Manage change task 2

8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Philosophy of Law

...Task: Philosophy of Law The past regime of governance for this was coupled with a myriad of unlawful acts. The countrystill utilized the ancient constitution that failed to enforce justice for the unlawful acts that many committed. This is evident in the way those parties seeking for power could freely form unlawful groups to campaign for them. The party in power assumed the leadership position after conducting reckless campaigns coupled with phony promises. The fact that Purple Shirts scared people on the eve to elections contributed massively to its winning as the party’s resistors failed to turn up. The incoming government took no initiative to amend the ancient constitution that the country had used...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Philosophy of Law the fact that the law is not just words integrated for acquiescence but that it has an innermost spiritual sense that more than what has been previously mentioned must be given effect. The men did not intend to kill Whetmore for the sole purpose of ending his life for personal ulterior motives. The sole reason for their act was survival. They exercised the primitive instinct innate in every human being to strive to keep alive at every means possible. The tragedy is not on the death of Roger Whetmore alone but on the prospect of seeing these men die again before us after sacrificing what part of their humanity they have already lost while imprisoned in the cave. Bibliography Fuller, Lon L. "The Case of the Speluncean...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Islamic Philosophy and Law

...Teacher 10 April 2007 Islamic Philosophy and Law Muslim scholars have relied on the continuous re-translations of their basic religious texts, the Qur'an and the Sunnah, for use in law enforcement. Use of the ancient text, coupled with the fact that religion is the basis for Islamic criminal justice, means that the fundamental differences between Islamic division of Shi-ite and Sunni Muslims is magnified in matters of the law. The divide between the two sects of Islam occurred at the death of the prophet Muhammad in 632 AD; since the spiritual leader had made no arrangements for his own succession, his followers were unsure what to do in his absence. The solution was...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy of business law

...BUSINESS LAW Philosophy of Business Law The answers to three hypothetical questions will be given. The first regards the constitutionality of the Arizona immigration law. The second regards the constitutionality of mandates for health care. The third question regards the issue of lifting a ban on selling wood from a particular kind of tree. According to an article on WordPress, anti-immigration could make Arizona a losing zone when it comes to winning electoral votes for the next presidential election ("What's the REAL Reason for Arizona's New Jos CrowLaw," 2010, p. 1). The anti-immigration law violates the Constitution on so many levels: it violates...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Philosophy of Law

...Does the Philosophy of Law have any practical value or is it just a mental exercise Is there any practical value to philosophy Or, is philosophy simply a mental exercise as applied to the law Before we further probe this question, we should establish that there is indeed a philosophy of law. Once that has been established we can analyze whether or not it is of any practical value or simply a philosophical exercise. The analysis after that establishment will use mainly contract, trust, wills, and probate law as examples of the necessity and practical value for a philosophy of...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

Philosophy and the law

...Philosophy and the Law: The Case of Mickey McHeinous The twin topic of crime and punishment, and their implication to society have always engaged the attention of scholars and academics. This preoccupation is not surprising considering that crime, and punishment, represents society’s last obstacle to free itself of the vestiges of primitiveness. Crime represents a continuous threat to society’s very existence, hampering it from freely and fully enjoying the advances of science and civilization. In the quest to end this uncertainty, society has deeply relied on punishment, but as time progresses it is evident that keeping criminals behind locked doors and even putting them under the gallows cannot deter...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

What is the subject of Philosophy of Law

...Philosophy of Law Philosophy of Law Law is one of the most intricate aspects of socio-political life; it revolves around the life of individuals and helps them coexist in tandem with one another. It is based on a philosophy as talked about by eminent thinkers and its very features emanate a sort of philosophical thinking on the basis of what law exactly is. Law generates human behaviour and is answerable for the actions of the people; it thus control and regulates the manner in which people exist around each other and thus, it poses an intellectual question as to how it carries out the same function. General jurisprudence, as part of law, thus maintains a strong hold over this very normative aspect of law as it tries to answer... the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Philosophy of Law

...Proper role of judges in the legal system People should know that rights are fundamentally important than rules. High court judge’s base their decisions when delivering judgment on the basis that all human beings are governed by innate policies or laws of nature which are different from laws that are made. Judges should practice legal positivity in that they have to make judicial decisions based on the natural laws. This is because natural law theory states that, source-based-character is dependence upon judicially created precedents which forms the platform for law’s capacity to advance the common good of all citizens, secure human rights and lastly...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Philosophy of law ( movie review )

...and their children were expelled from school. Only the native religion and culture was to be upheld. The acts of the Nazis apparently relied on the philosophy of nationalism. Nationalism demands that a nation protects its interests and sovereignty with all means possible. Any intruding civilization is treated with inferiority and cruelty. In the case of “Night of Broken Glass”, nationalism had been exaggerated by its proponents. It was expansionist nationalism, marked with a radical military aggression towards the Jews. Nazism may be justified on the basis of sovereignty and prevention of culture distortion. Whereas the government and the Nazis were strongly supporting nationalism philosophy, a large...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy of Law Essay for FREE!

Contact Us