Nobody downloaded yet

Value of a philosopher:Socrates - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Socrates is one of the greatest ancient Greek philosophers of the fifth century. However, there is no opportunity to analyze his great works, because he was teaching and philosophizing orally. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
Value of a philosopher:Socrates
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Value of a philosopher:Socrates"

Download file to see previous pages Socrates is one of the greatest ancient Greek philosophers of the fifth century. However, there is no opportunity to analyze his great works, because he was teaching and philosophizing orally. Famous Xenophon and Plato were Socrates’ students who managed to record some of the great thoughts and teachings of the wise philosopher (Harris & Taylor, 4). Socrates’ main direction in teaching was logical way of thinking. One of the most famous Socratic methods of teaching was a dialogue, during which knowledge was uncovered by logical thinking of a student and reasonable guidance by a teacher. Thesis, Socrates’ personal input in development of Athens is in his Method of Inquiry, excellent oratorical skills, beliefs and teachings about eternal virtues. Therefore, it would be justified to claim that Socrates provided a ‘vital’ service to Athens. At the same time, however, Socrates was a brilliant speaker and could charm his audience without much effort. Some of the listeners were really bothered by his thoughts and claims, while the others really liked the way of thinking Socrates presented to them. The variety of topics Socrates covered was rather fast starting individual and the state and ending with religious issues. Being atheist himself Socrates claimed that there is only one God and not many. Because of his ‘anti-religious’ claims the great philosopher was sentenced to death becoming a national martyr. Socrates’ Rhetoric Because primary means of expression was oral language in Athens, it was crucial to know how to speak on public. Socrates was one of the great speakers at his time. Laws were firstly discussed and only then recorded. Persuasive speaking was one of the major skills of successful leader or beginning politician. Most of the important social and political issues were decided through oral debates and speeches. An effective interlocutor could defend himself easily in court. Therefore, speaking skills as well as education were essential to be effective in any state affair and in public life in general (Colaiaco, 24). When Socrates was young he also belongs to the so-called group of philosophers, sophists. The sophists became central figures in political life of Greece and especially of Athens. These people were believed to be wise and able to teach their wisdom to the others. Therefore, the Athenians used to believe that philosophical education especially that of sophists was the essential part of further successful career. However, Socrates knew this system too well and it was the reason that he decided to leave the sophists. Later, during his defensive Socrates proves that effective persuasive speech is not necessarily true speech. He begins his defensive speech with the following ironic statement, which is also the beginning of the Apology: I don’t know, men of Athens, how you were affected by my accusers. As for me, I was almost carried away by them, the spoke so persuasively. And yet almost nothing they said is true. Among their many falsehoods, however, one especially amazed me: that you must be careful not to be deceived by me, since I’m dangerously clever speaker (Morgan, 46). Such a warning of the Sophists implies that Socrates was very effective public speaker. Their fear that he might influence judges is sincere. However, Socrates from his side tries to make a distinction between deceitful persuasive speaking and truthful speech, that of sophists and his own respectively. Colaiaco makes an assertion that during his trial Socrates raises the issue of “the morality of conversional forensic rhetoric” (p. 28). From the very beginning to the very end of his life Socrates was sincere and truthful in everything he did and said. The major distinction between Socrates and the sophists is that he was speaking from the bottom of his soul conversing the truth and wisdom of life by effective speech; while the sophists were delivering effective speech, whether truthful or not, to reach their aim, which was to persuade the audience. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Value of a philosopher:Socrates Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1407843-value-of-a-philosophersocrates
(Value of a philosopher:Socrates Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1407843-value-of-a-philosophersocrates.
“Value of a philosopher:Socrates Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1407843-value-of-a-philosophersocrates.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Value of a philosopher:Socrates

Socrates - The Greatest Philosopher Of All Time

...to which would yield a solution (socrates a closer look at the greatest thinker). The Socrates method was later adopted by almost all the philosophers who followed him in the post Socrates era and it was this contribution of his which earned him his mantle as the father of western philosophy. Socrates was a man of great values and emphasized on truth and justice throughout his life. He believed that material wealth was of least importance and self development was necessary for the well being of the populace. Virtue was in his opinion the most valuable possession. As for the material wealth he said,” He is richest who is content with the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Socrates

...?Socrates Table of Contents Introduction 3 Thesis ment 3 Explanation of the Argument 4 Analysis 5 Conclusion 7 Works Cited 8 Introduction Socrates and Protagoras hold dissimilar philosophical views about different aspects of teaching and learning virtue. According to the viewpoint claimed by Plato with his dialogues in Protagoras, there exists an undeviating interrelation between moral truth and ordinary common sense. As can be observed from Protagoras’ acclamations, the personal values and beliefs of an individual regarding different aspect of virtue and morality are indistinctive. To put it in simple words, Protagoras views the principle of morality as a valuable aspect...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Socrates

...beauty, the beauty of one’s spirit and character. In conjunction with happiness, which was also a construct that Socrates discussed, he denotes that one cannot tell if a person is happy or not based on his external appearance, but happiness, like kindness, is a matter of inner qualities. His famous motto: “An unexamined life is not worth living” is a testimony to how much he values thinking and philosophy and the perennial introspection of why we exist. Constantly reflecting about one’s life and impact on others creates meaning for a person and Socrates encourages that we indulge in deep, critical thinking ourselves at all times. Socrates’ legacy is not volumes of his...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Socrates

...to be mastered as a whole. In this view, Socrates definition of virtue to support his acceptance of fate is a bit too narrow. Because he defines virtue in this manner, claiming that subjects require teachers in order to be teachable, a lack of tutors is the reason the Socrates late claims that, “virtue can certainly not be taught” (Plato 87). He also agrees with the view held by Theognis, “a bad man will never be made well by teaching (Plato 88). This is in contradiction to what Socrates believed earlier that people could be taught to hold virtue in esteem. Socrates believed that the life of a philosopher was one of virtue; it was possible to re-awaken...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

Socrates

..., and fellow critics, the governance of Athens had become crooked and disgracefully inept—in stark contrast to the Age of Pericles only a few years before. “Philosophical” quarrels had become mere demagoguery: ploys to convince others; aspirations for political power slowly supplanted justice. Socrates knew that Athenians spoke of their values fluently, but seldom lived according to them—and even more infrequently examined them. In response, Socrates formed a practice of asking outwardly naive questions that ensnared his opponents within their own uncertainty and duplicity, and deconstructed the posturing of the times. And critical of their long-held convictions, he spoke...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Socrates

.... It is the name or the word that counts basically, but it is the thing itself that matters ultimately. Bibliography Rumsey, W.D., 1987. Plato In The Cratylus On Speaking, Language And Learning, History of Philosophy Quarterly [online], available at: (http://www.jstor.org/stable/27743827) Steve Hoenisch., 2005. Hermogenes Was Right, Socrates Wrong, Criticism. [online] Available at: (http://www.criticism.com/linguistics/cratylus.html) Keller, Simon, 2000. An Interpretation of Plato’s “Cratylus”, Phronesis, p.285 [online]. Available at : (http://www.jstor.org/stable/27743827) Robinson, Richard. 1956. A Criticism of Plato’s Cratylus, The philosophical Review, p.325 [online]. Available at :...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

SOCRATES

...of Socrates could be treated nicely by his contemporaries. When we consider the personality of Socrates we do not feel anything except respect towards him and great surprise when we find out that he was executed. We will not consider the negative traits of his character, it is essential to analyze his philosophic beliefs and their value. However, the level of beliefs in that historical moment represented a line, every deviation from which was considered abnormal. It did not matter if the personality fell lower this level or appeared above it like Socrates. Religious beliefs was very strong and influential, thus, the first accusation is creating new Gods...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Socrates

... to authors, Socrates was torn between his religion and respecting the law. Personally, he valued his philosophical mission while on the other hand being a Nationalist; he had much value to states laws (Miller & Nicholas 112). Socrates life experiences proved that he was dedicated to his decisions and could not be lured away by any favors. This book conforms to the thesis of this paper since they prove that Socrates loved religion and respecting the law equally. Taylor in his journal, the classic quarterly, discusses the faith of Socrates and demonstrates his respect for religion. Taylor says that, Socrates religion was different from that of other ordinary Athenians since he was committed to it under all conditions (Taylor 159... ...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Socrates

...Teacher 24th January 2051 Socrates’ View of evil actions, its validity and Philosophy “There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” Socrates All sages and philosophers have differing views on evil actions related questions. Some philosophers say evil actions are not in our extinct but some say the contrary. It is a very long discussion to prove these both concepts. Socrates’ view about evil actions is based on realistic thinking. Socrates believed that nobody deliberately chooses to do wrong. He also believed that nobody wants to harm his or herself. And he maintained that if a person does anything wrong to himself or...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Socrates

...was to bring about an ethical society that depended on the inner need to live ethically rather than being guided by theological or other perspectives (Abel, 430). Socrates work therefore founded a basis for the development of theories of ethics and republic that were coined by later philosophers. First, Socrates believed that the true value of life is in the pursuit of true knowledge. From his perspective, “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Cohen, 46). To stress on ethics as a concept to die for, he does not accept exile when convicted and chooses to remain in Athens and face death in an environment where he could cross-examine people as he wished. Although he...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Value of a philosopher:Socrates for FREE!

Contact Us