Multinational Command Relationship - Assignment Example

Discussion Paper: Multinational Command Relationship Word Count: 500 (2 pages) I. Identify in your paper the constraints placed upon the Coalition’s ability to define the best Coordinating Council (C2) solution. (200 words) The Coalition might have a difficult time coordinating all the different various countries. The Coalition Counsel is generally going to be headed by the United States, but all operations are going to go through the C2 Coalition Lead of the United States. All countries—Azerbaijan, Turkey, Great Britain, and the U.S.—are going to have to defer to the United States for instructions.

These instructions will then be forwarded to the US Commander of TACON. All the operational aspects will be handled by the US TACON Commander. The constraints that might be difficult to coordinate within the council itself include coordinating the various military branches to act in accordance with each other against the SAPA in Ahurastan. The most likely outcome, with constraints being placed on the ability to define the C2 solution—would have to be a complete deference to the TACON commander, who would be in charge of the entire operation.

This is so that the operation can be run smoothly—and, possibly remotely—from a secure location whereby U.S. Special Forces can control the entire situation or at least influence it to some degree. Undoubtedly, the U.S. Special Forces will basically control the entire solution, in effect. II. Give a detailed justification, including at least two advantages and disadvantages of your recommended multinational command structure. (300 words) The United States has one of the most well-equipped and capable militaries of any superpower country—and in fact, it is the world leader in these types of military operations.

Basically, every country must defer to the United States because it is in control of this entire mission. There are two advantages to this: a) the United States has a large military arsenal from which it can draw supplies as well as recruit troops; and b) the United States can have full control over whatever is happening, thereby making this an operation which will be acted upon in the U.S.’s best foreign policy interests. The two disadvantages to such coordination might be: a) the fact that these countries do not want to be told what to do by the United States, i.e., it may be a power play move on the behalf of the U.S.; and b) secondly, military intervention by the U.S. could very much well look like another occupation of a foreign Asian country—like Afghanistan.

To put the second point into layman’s terms, it could also look a lot like the Shock and Awe Iraqi invasion of 2003. The multinational command structure is designed so that all parties can defer to the United States before they take action. This means that all air support would defer to the U.S. Air Force. All water support would defer to the U.S. Navy. All land support would defer to the U.S. Army. Basically, all of these organizations would be getting supported by the Coalition lead forces, which would be supported by TACON—which in turn would be supported itself by U.S. Special Forces. The U.S.

Special Forces would ensure that the entire operation to free Ahurastan went completely smoothly and that there would be enough operatives on the ground too. Diagram 1.1. C2 Forces Diagram. WORKS CITED C2 Forces Diagram. Created 5 April 2011. Available: .