Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1414485-summary
https://studentshare.org/other/1414485-summary.
The US secretary of education, Margaret Spellings expressed her concern over the rising tuition fee in the United States and articulated the need for governmental actions in order to moderate tuition growth. There were remarkable variations in average tuition and fee charges between the various states. While Pennsylvania showed average tuition and fee charges like $8410 in 2005-2006, it was $3100 in Florida and $6910 in South Carolina. In fact, there was a notable difference in charges as well as in the student enrollment in various institutions. A number of reasons are pointed out as the factors driving tuition charges. Dennis Jones suggests tuition setting in public institutions as closely related to the health of other institutional revenues. Apparent influences of a variety of political factors in postsecondary policymaking at the state level have been observed. Various examinations revealed relationships between indicators of educational structure and indicators of political influence.
Descriptive representation compares the similarities in the background between elected officials and their constituents. On the contrary, substantive representation refers to the interests elected officials to serve. There are various opinions on the enhancement of substantive representation and various models are also developed. The model named ‘presence’ assumes minority representatives to act as stronger advocates for minority constituents (McLendon et al, 6). The panel-data model implies that the pricing behavior of universities is heterogeneous and is difficult to be captured using available data (McLendon et al, 15). The influence of institutions on their agents and their actions in the arena of post-secondary policy hold important implications that determine their ‘look’.