Http://www.aorn.org/ - Essay Example

Evaluation of Websites The website that will be evaluated has the URL: http www.aorn.org/ Evaluation of the website has been done according to thefollowing criteria: Domain The domain of the current website is .org which gives it a comparatively higher level of credibility. The banner itself clearly and succinctly provides the objective of the website which is to empower OR nurses with proper education and benefits of networking with peers to always remain aware of the latest developments and practices.

Accuracy The home page of the website provides news relevant for OR nurses and also details upcoming events and meetings of these paramedical persons. There is absolutely no spelling or grammatical errors. This automatically projects a sense of purpose and honesty on the part of those that have put up this website (AORN Journal, 2011). Authority The website looks to be reputable as the declared intention of the website is socially beneficial without any apparent intentions of duping an unsuspecting visitor.

The news items are generally those released by the FDA, so the accuracy and credibility of those are beyond question. Moreover, the contact details of the authors and their educational qualifications, which are very much related to the topic, are clearly mentioned thus eliminating any sense of vagueness and opacity in the matter that is presented in the website (Malghan & Murphey, 2011). The simple yet effective image of OR nurses in action wearing their trademark masks immediately conveys a sense of seriousness and purpose to the entire website.

A casual visitor is immediately struck by the image and realizes that this website means business. This is the main reason for it to be a well respected and extremely credible website (Harris, 2010). Objectivity The website does not provide any form of value judgment on the information provided on its pages, except where it states the benefits of being a member of OR nurses community. That too is presented in a very impersonal manner by simply listing the benefits without any exhortation of becoming a member.

This adds more respectability and credibility to the website. The website is absolutely non-judgmental even in issues related to the choice of profession as an OR nurse but it could have taken on a propagandist mode if it had the intention of attracting more and more people to the profession. The fact that it restricts itself to only providing relevant news gives it an additional aura of objectivity and consequent respect (Barrett, 2011). Currency The informational articles are always current, hardly three to seven days old, thus making all the information not only topical but also relevant.

The links provided in the articles are also current. Coverage The website is intended for OR nurses and the information that is provided is very much related to the professional requirements of these people and the upcoming meetings and congresses that OR nurses would do well to attend to update their knowledge and skills. User Friendliness or Usability The website hardly takes any time to load. Thumbnails of relevant news items are present on the homepage itself thus providing an opportunity for the visitor to pick and choose the news items that one wishes to pursue in further detail.

A click on one of news items almost instantaneously leads one to the relevant page. This website thus is very user friendly; even a casual visitor can very well navigate across various pages. References AORN Journal. (2011). Retrieved February 17, 2011, from AORN: http://www.aorn.org/ Barrett, S. (2011, February 14). Your Guide to Quackery, Health Fraud, and Intelligent Decisions. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from Quackwatch: http://www.quackwatch.com/ Harris, R. (2010, November 22). Evaluating Internet Research Sources.

Retrieved February 17, 2011, from VirtualSalt: http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm Malghan, S., & Murphey, S. (2011, February 13). FDA drafts guidance document recommending warning statements for powdered gloves. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from AORN: http://www.aorn.org/news/view/22C49F0B-D44D-333F-8FD60DA02BCB7BC3/