Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning - Essay Example

Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning Your al affiliation More Shame by Cedar Rapids The Roman Catholic hierarchyin this country has promised accountability and justice for children sexually abused by priests. (2)We fear it has a long way to go. (3)A new inquiry has found that nearly a decade after the scandal engulfed the American church, children are still in peril (4) and some leaders are still stonewalling investigations. A grand-jury report released Feb. 10 accused three priests and a teacher in the Philadelphia Archdiocese of raping two young boys in the 1990s.

It also accused a senior church official of knowingly endangering thousands of children by shielding accused priests for years. The Philadelphia district attorney brought sexual-assault charges against the priests and teacher, and charged Msgr. William Lynn, with two counts of child endangerment, apparently the first time a church leader has been criminally charged with covering up abuse. Monsignor Lynn was secretary of the clergy under retired Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, responsible for investigating abuse allegations from 1992 to 2004.

Instead, according to the grand jury, he shuffled credibly accused priests among unsuspecting parishes, putting “literally thousands of children at risk of sexual abuse.” (5)The report said at least three dozen accused priests remain in active ministry in the archdiocese, nearly all unidentified. (6)The grand jury asked the archdiocese for its records on the accusations against those priests; months later, (7) the archdiocese has not fully complied. (8)These are not the first accusations against the Philadelphia Archdiocese.

A blistering grand-jury report in 2005 exposed the abuse of hundreds of children by more than 60 archdiocesan priests, lamenting that the church’s cover-up had succeeded since the statute of limitations made it impossible to prosecute the predators. The recent grand jury said it had no doubt that the scale of the crimes and the extent of the official cover-up went far beyond the cases of sodomy and rape it documented in horrifying detail. It cited continued institutional weaknesses that allowed such crimes to go undetected or unpunished — an obsession with secrecy, a concern for abusers over victims, the inherent conflict in having “victim assistance coordinators” who are supposed to help stricken families but who are church employees with divided loyalties. (9)The grand jury has implored the current leader of the archdiocese, Cardinal Justin Rigali, to fully cooperate with its investigation and institute reforms, beginning with opening its files on abuse accusations, swiftly removing credibly accused priests from ministry and financing truly independent investigations.

It also urged Pennsylvania to suspend for two years the civil statute of limitations on sexual abuse claims. States across the country should do the same. There will be no justice or healing until all victims’ voices are heard and the church finally shows true accountability. Summary Despite the promises of justice for sexually abused children and accountability for accused priests by The Roman Catholic hierarchy, it seems that it will take long time. It is because an inquiry reported the similar risks to children at present and conscious delay in investigation even after a decade of scandal became public.

Three dozen accused priests are active in ministry in the archdiocese and all of them are practically unidentified. Grand jury has asked for the records on accusations against priests, but even after months of the request, the archdiocese in unable to comply completely. Moreover, this is not first accusation against Philadelphia Archdiocese. Grand jury reported abuse of h hundreds of children by 60 archdiocesan priests in 2005.However, church’s cover up stopped the investigation and thus, prosecution of predators.

Grand jury is again horrified at the number of rapes and lamenting over the limitations of statute and church’s loyalty with predators. Now, the jury has implored church’s current leadership to cooperate in investigation and introduce reforms in the system. Writer also urges the suspension of statute of limitation for investigation and justice. Argument evaluation The opinion is developed using inductive reasoning since it is making a prediction based on premises. It gives a generalized conclusion (2) that we fear it has a long way to go.

Conclusion (2) is supported by (1) The Roman Catholic hierarchy in this country has promised accountability and justice for children sexually abused by priests. Primarily based on premises (3) a new inquiry has found that nearly a decade after the scandal engulfed the American church, children are still in peril and (4) some leaders are still stonewalling investigations (2) is concluded. Furthermore (5) presence of suspected but unidentified active ministers (6) jury’s long held request (7) archdiocese’s noncompliance are other premises also lead to the same conclusion (2).

The argument is strongly built and reinforced because (8) similar handling, delaying, and protection of accused priests in 2005 under statute of limitation, and (9) grand jury again making requests to church’s leadership for cooperation and reforms rather than taking serious action, all these premises lead to the same conclusion (2) that we fear it has long way to go. In this argument, conclusion flows from the premises (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) which are true; therefore, the argument is strong and cogent.

Work Cited Cedar, R. (2011, Feb, 14). More Shame. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/opinion/15tue2.html?ref=opinion