StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the paper "Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism" will begin with the statement that terrorism had caused great dilemmas to mankind. It has been rampant in the news recently. When one hears of the word “terrorism”, several things would come into one’s mind…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism"

English Terrorism Introduction Terrorism had caused great dilemma to mankind. It has been rampant in the news recently. When onehears of the word “terrorism”, several things would come into one’s mind. One may think of Osama Bin Laden upon hearing the term for he is considered as one of the notorious terrorist of all time and many people believe that he was the one who fueled up acts of terrorism in any part of the globe. His infamous act of terrorism has also been one of the most tragic and heart-breaking incident that marked the pages of world history and that is, the 9/11 attack, which is considered as one of the apparent examples of terrorism. Terrorism has also been associated to a variety of terminologies so as to give individuals a picture of what it is. Others linked it with civil disobedience while others label it as acts of violence. However, experts claimed that these three are very different terms from each other but in as much as one wished to gain adequate understanding of the word “terrorism”, it is crucial also to obtain insight about the other two terms often connected with it. Civil disobedience is deemed acceptable by many deliberative democrats as long as it remains relevantly tied to the objective of communicative action (Allen 15). However, Allen also emphasized that certain kinds of terrorism cannot be ruled out either (15). On the other hand, an individual must acknowledge that the deliberative democrat will not really be able to justify taking life as a maneuver for the reason that dead people cannot deliberate (Allen 15). Allen highlighted that this does not rule out terrorism per se, the object of which is not death so much as to bringing about fear, anxiety and trauma (Allen 15). Moreover, while a persistent circumstance of fear would set the boundaries on forethought, restricted and transitory physical harm to individuals need not (Allen 15). For this instance, it entails that deliberative democrats must elucidate why purposely causing some physical harm to property or person is constantly an illicit and unlawful means of communication and demonstration (Allen 15). This paper endeavors to explore the concepts associated with terrorism and to tackle the impacts brought about by such circumstance. Definition, Association and the Concepts surrounding Terrorism Terrorism had always been synonymous to threat, intimidation, trauma and destruction. Individuals express anxiety whenever such term is brought up. Defining exactly what terrorism is proves to be a rather daunting task. One must also learn and understand to grasp the essence of the other terms connected with it to be able to fully obtain a clear insight about what this is as guided by certain propositions of expert and the law. Civil Disobedience is one of the terms confused with terrorism for the reason that some governments might label such acts as form of terrorism even though for the ones doing it, their main objective was only to find a means for their voices to be heard and for their standpoints to be given attention. Civil Disobedience is a tactic that is hard to reconcile neatly with persuasion and communication as stressed by Allen (15). Indeed, many deliberative democrats are willing to concede that civil disobedience contains some irreducible elements of threat and intimidation (Allen 15-16). Nevertheless, the deliberative democrats still supposed that it can still be accommodated within the conceptual orbit of deliberative democracy, and the priority that it gives to legitimate actions through public communication (Allen 16). Conversely, terrorism is a position that deliberative democrats extensively believe to be in every respect incompatible with their fundamental theoretical commitments (Allen 16). Terrorist acts, which scale up from non-violent illegal protest to the violent annihilation of property or lives, truly say the opposite with the deliberative ideal of justification through non-coercive public communication (Allen 16). In the case of civil disobedience, however, threat and intimidation is thought to remain relevantly tied to the ideal of communication but terrorist acts can also be interpreted as encompassing distinct semantic components as both public and communicative (Allen 16). Nevertheless, it is supposed that terrorism cannot be entirely ruled out by deliberative democrats but simultaneously, there can be no straightforward backing of terrorism by deliberative democrats, even when the term terrorism is defined in a neutral way that rejects the uncomplimentary assumption of gratuitous and capricious hostility (Allen 16). Indeed, scrutinizing deliberative democracy against the occurrence of terrorism pushes the limits of deliberative democracy beyond the steadfastness of civil disobedient persons to non-violence (Allen 16). On the contrary, the type of terrorism cannot be effortlessly reconciled with the allegiance of deliberative democrats to treating all persons as free and equal dialogical partners, who are proficient of formulating allegations in ongoing deliberative processes (Allen 16). If compulsion crosses the limitations set by the criterion of non-violence, then it has to do so in a way that continues to honor the deliberative democratic devotion to the freedom and equality of speakers in a public communicative forum (Allen 16). Thus, this necessitates a balancing act that may well be extraordinarily complex to perform in practice while not in principle impossible to fulfill (Allen 16). Every anti-terrorism measure suggested by government leaders tests the fine line between fighting terrorism and denying basic liberties (CATO Institute 1). The majority of measures offered by well-meaning legislators that have been going on would do little or nothing to stop or deter terrorism (CATO Institute 1). It is unlikely to exactly pinpoint what could have avoided terrorism acts in the past such as the World Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Amtrak derailment in Arizona or even the Unabomber; in fact, such measures cheerfully and without apology to do more to crack down on average Americans than on terrorists (CATO Institute 1). Acts of violence are not automatically terrorist acts, no matter how much legislation regulates them and how much technology is at law enforcement’s directive; no one can deter or stop a psychotic predator from formulating or perpetrating an act of violence (CATO Institute 1). The fear of terrorism and the trauma brought about by it often poses that extreme measures are done so as to avoid the occurrence of another terrorist attack. However, this does not necessitate that the enforcement of the law may intrude into any citizen’s private life and no protestations of good intentions in pursuit of security must be permitted to increase the limits of government power (CATO Institute 1). In evaluating new laws, Wizner suggested that the principle should be “safe but free” and he offered two simple but direct ways to judge the new security measures (Thorson 1). First, “Will this law make us safer?” and second, “Even if it will makes us safer, is it worth it?” and an obvious example cited is the wiretapping done to eavesdrop on Mosques which necessitates justification why certain Mosques were investigated while others are not (Thorson 1). It was also highlighted that with this, it is even more difficult to argue that “total information awareness” is worth it; thus, “it seems more likely that hundreds of innocent people will be become suspects” (Thorson 1). Lastly, it was highlighted that terrorism is a war of unknown duration against unnamed foes (Thorson 1). The Impacts of Terrorism Terrorist attacks stimulated a variety of outcomes that provoked widespread society awareness. Criticisms of present laws arise and several emotions have developed because of the occurrence of terrorist acts. The United States Supreme Court responded slowly to the constitutional questions stimulated by post-September 11, 2001 anti-terror strategies hence, many inquiries were still left unanswered (Poscher 1). Certain issues left unexplored include the absence of rulings on the “special treatment” of detainees in the fight against terrorism, and the nonexistence of decisions on wiretapping issues or other surveillance questions (Poscher 1). Moreover, there seems to be a conflict with the Court decisions and the standpoint of the individuals as provoked by the people’s trauma on the 9/11 Terrorist attack on the World Trade Center for in the case of Guantanamo detainees who were deemed as terrorists wherein the writ of habeas corpus was imposed, the decision was opposed and the justices supporting the ruling were accused of contributing to the killing of the Americans (Poscher 1; Perkins 437-471). The task of setting constitutional limits to legislative and administrative anti-terror measures is not only politically delicate but doctrinally demanding (Poscher 1). In contrast with the background attacks like the ones on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and the fear of even more monstrous attacks with biological or nuclear weapons supposed that many constitutional standards become elusive (Poscher 1). Americans specifically the New Yorkers have waited for the “closure” of the 9/11 attack and it was achieved nearly ten years for the news of Osama Bin Laden’s death, the mastermind of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center (Greenwald 1). The news “was hoped to at least bring some measures of closure and comfort to all those who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001” as stated by the New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (Greenwald 1). Moreover, due to the terrorist attacks, three intertwined accomplishments have proven to be the dispositive features of American success in the war against terrorism: formulating the Freedom Agenda, reversing the course of war in Iraq and establishing a national-security apparatus to foil multiple terrorist attacks which has been considered as the most controversial foreign policies that the United States of America has implemented since the Vietnam War (Greenwald 1). Studies were also conducted to gain a better understanding of attitudes toward restrictive political measures that were issued in the aftermath of September 11 and thus to the understanding of psychological underpinnings of threats to democracy showing that although feelings of threat from terrorism did not eventually lead to stronger endorsement of surveillance measures and restriction of civil liberties, they reinforced the effect of Right-Wing Authoritarianism or RWA on support for surveillance (Cohrs et al. 276). Conclusion Terrorism is a very complicated term hence; it is a difficult endeavor to provide the exact definition of the term. Confusion can still result whenever the term is raised in arguments. Nevertheless, continuous learning of the concepts and the laws gives one a clearer picture of what this term encompasses. Moreover, the social stigma associated with the term could also elicit a variety of emotions and perspectives whenever the term is tried to explore. Works Cited Allen, Michael. “Civil Disobedience and Terrorism Testing the Limits of Deliberative Democracy.” Theoria: A Journal of Social & Political Theory 56.118 (30 Mar. 2009): 15-39. CATO Institute. Combatting Terrorism, Protecting Freedom. November/December 1996. CATO Policy Report, CATO Institute. 14 December 2011. . Cohrs, J. Christopher, Kielmann, Sven, Maes, Jurgen, and Barbara Moschner. “Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties.” Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy 5.1 (2005): 263-276. Greenwald, Abe. “A Decade after 9/11: What We Got Right in the War on Terror.” Commentary 132.2 (2011): 14. Perkins, Jared. “Habeas Corpus in the War against Terrorism: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Citizen Enemy Combatants.” BYU Journal of Public Law 19.2 (2005): 437-471. Poscher, Ralf. “Terrorism and the Constitution.” Dissent 56.1 (2009): 13-18. Thorson, Carla. Terrorism vs. Civil Rights: A Debate. 4 April 2003. UCLA International Institue. 14 December 2011. . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Error”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1393934-terrorism
(Error)
https://studentshare.org/other/1393934-terrorism.
“Error”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/other/1393934-terrorism.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism

UK Counter-Terrorism Strategy Protection

18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Strategies for Protecting Human Rights from Record Examination of the UN in Action on Terrorism

What do we learn about international strategies for protecting human rights from an examination of the record of the UN in action on terrorism?... he UN and its member states unequivocally condemn the resort to terrorism for any purpose, and acknowledge that the States have a duty to protect its citizens and all who sojourn within their jurisdiction.... or this reason, the United Nations Global Counter-terrorism Strategy has been instituted.... In the 2005 Madrid Summit, then UN Secretary-General echoed the unanimous observation of international rights experts, both within and outside the UN system, that counter-terrorism measures that have been adopted to that date have all infringed on human rights and fundamental freedoms in one way or another (Foot, 2007)....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Essence of Terrorist Attacks

The aims of this study include an analysis of the fear of crime as it affects employees of an organisation, with special focus on terrorism related crime.... herefore, the review is organised to identify the constructs of terrorism, identify a psychological definition of 'fear of crime', followed by insights into situational crime prevention theory and the psychological impact of a terrorist attack.... mpirical literature shows that although terrorist attacks can kill and injure thousands of people and cause immense damage to property, the essence of terrorism, as the name implies, is not destruction but terror: destruction is a means to the end and the end is a psychological effect....
24 Pages (6000 words) Essay

Homegrown Terrorist and Extremist Living in the Heartland

This research proposal "Homegrown Terrorist and Extremist Living in the Heartland" forces people not only to think about other countries or other terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda when the word terrorism is spelled out, but it could also be a person who is living right next to you.... The research is aimed at identifying where terrorism springs its roots and leads its neck out into society.... It is also aimed at providing a detailed conception of how terrorism and lone extremists are being raised within our own country and to clear the misconceptions that people have about terrorists that theme only from other countries....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Proposal

The Impact of Terrorism on Liberty

terrorism has existed since the days of the Romans as assassins attempted to eliminate foreign occupying forces.... Modern terrorism, aided by new technology and communication, has reached a new level in its ability to wage violence and inflict fear.... Yet, to be effective in the fight against terrorism, the terrorist must be well defined and the target needs to be focused.... At what point does the security become more troublesome than the fear Is the security worth the cost To sufficiently analyze the debate that surrounds this question, it is first necessary to frame the question with a well-focused definition of terrorism....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

The 7/7/London Bombings of July 7, 2005

The paper "The 7/7/London Bombings of July 7, 2005 " discusses that it must be stated that the newspaper The Guardian seems to have followed a secular approach in its coverage.... This newspaper has presented the most balanced and rational view of the incidents.... ... ... ... Generally, the 7/7/London bombings of July 7, 2005, unleashed a plethora of media coverage, abounding in insinuations and allegations about the complicity of a particular religious group – the Muslims – in the horrific tragedy....
69 Pages (17250 words) Essay

The Direct and Indirect Victims of Terrorism

terrorism is unique in the field of victimology in that it actively seeks to create indirect victims.... While terrorism has existed for millennia, recent uses of the criminal act and escalated methods have increased the level of societys awareness of the victims of terrorism.... Where in centuries past the concept of terrorism was to instill fear, modern terrorism seeks to murder on a massive scale.... mericans have lived with various forms of terrorism since the countrys beginning, but only recently has it been viewed as a complex social issue....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Terrorism on Aviation

This work called "terrorism on Aviation" describes the problem of terrorism.... As noted earlier the purpose of the study is exploring terrorism on aviation through descriptive research and analysis of existing secondary materials.... terrorism in aviation has significantly over years led to the death of numerous passengers and non-passengers in the target areas all over the world.... 75) notes that terrorism is an independent and self-reproducing socio-political phenomenon of violence....
81 Pages (20250 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us