Nobody downloaded yet

Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory - Term Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory Name Institution Instructor Date Abstract This paper explores two major leadership theories: Robert House’s Goal Path Theory and Fred Fiedler’s Contingency Theory. Both the two leadership theories contend that leadership is contingent to certain factors…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.9% of users find it useful
Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory"

Download file to see previous pages It concludes that none of the theories can be applied single handedly hence, they need to be correlated. Key words: contingency theory, goal path theory, leadership, and management. Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory Introduction Leadership is increasingly becoming an interesting subject of study with various theories emerging to explain why some leaders are more effective than others are. Such theories open up our minds to the various leadership approaches and enrich our leadership skills. The theories include trait theories, power and influence theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and path theories. This essay will focus on Fiedler’s Contingency and House’s Path Theory as models of analyzing leadership (Lussier & Achua, 2010). Fiedler’s contingency theory and its applicability Fiedler’s contingency theory is the brainchild of Fred Fiedler a scientist who majored in leadership and personality. The model posits that there is no standard style of leadership instead; the leadership styles adopted depend on the situation and circumstances. As such, the leadership style depends on the situations favorable. The first step in the model is identifying the leadership style. Fiedler holds that leadership styles are fixed and can be measured through a model he refers to as the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. The scale requires one to consider the person they enjoy working with the most and rate them for each factor then give them a score. The factors include friendliness, cooperation, pleasance, sincerity, loyalty, kindness, cheerfulness, openness, supportiveness, calmness, and acceptance (Nohria & Khurana, 2010). If the person scores high then you are a relationship-oriented leader. If the score is low then you are a task-oriented leader. This implies that task oriented leaders have more negative LPCs. Fiedler also refers to them as low-LPC leaders (Lussier & Achua, 2010). He explains that such leaders are effective in task completion and quick in organizing groups to accomplish a particular task. Relationship building is not their priority. On the other hand, the relationship-oriented leaders have LPCs that are more positive. They are also known as high-LPC leaders. They focus on personal connections and are effective in avoiding managerial conflict. They can also make complex decisions (Sadler, 2003). The next step to one’s type of leadership is through situational favorableness. Fiedler relates this to three factors. First is the leader-member relations, which is the trust, and confidence the team has in their leader. A leader that is trusted is in a more favorable situation than one who is not. Then there is the task structure, which is the clarity or vagueness of the task being performed. Unstructured tasks put the team and their leader in an unfavorable situation. The last is the leader’s position of power, the more power a leader has the more favorable the situation. Application Fiedler’s theory main premise is that a leader in a strict and task-oriented environment has different qualities from one in an open-minded environment. The theory helps to improve leader-member relationships by helping both the leaders and the group members to understand group problems and help solve them. It also allows for consultation and feedback within an organization. The model prepares leaders and other group members to work with difficult individuals (Nohria & Khurana, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory Term Paper”, n.d.)
Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory Term Paper. Retrieved from
(Fiedler Contingency Theory Vs House-Path Goal Theory Term Paper)
Fiedler Contingency Theory Vs House-Path Goal Theory Term Paper.
“Fiedler Contingency Theory Vs House-Path Goal Theory Term Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory

Fieldler's Contingency Theory

...?Fieldler’s contingency theory was developed by Fred Fieldler in the 1960’s. The basic premise of the theory is that group effectiveness depends on the correct match between the leadership style of the leader and the expectations of the situation. One of the most important concepts of the theory is situational control. Situational control can be defined as the extent to which leaders can determine what their group is going to do and what the outcomes of their actions and decisions are going to be (Schermerhorn & Hunt & Osborn, 2003). Another important instrument used in the theory is the least preferred worker scale. This scale measures the leadership...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Path-Goal Style

...? Path-Goal Style Introduction Path-Goal theory is fundamentally defined as depicting the notion of ‘Workplace Leadership’. This theory has been constructed on the basis of the concepts relating to motivational theories that includes. ‘Goal-Setting Theory’ and ‘Expectancy Theory’. In this context, ‘Goal-Setting Theory’ implies an effective direction to encourage people for setting challenging as well as realistic goals and to offer recognitions for the accomplishment of that specific goal. Conversely,...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Contingency Theory

...? Contingency Theory Contingency Theory: Science or Technology? Contingency theory is seen as a dominant and rational approach especially at the structural level of analysis in organization theory and design, and this theory assumes that the environment in which an organization undertakes its activities plays a leading role in how the organization organizes its operations and itself. Studies reveal that there is a link between the features of the environment and that of an organization, and this is referred to as ‘fit’ which enhances the performance of the organization (Betts, 2011). Arguably,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Contingency Theory and Global Leadership

...? Contingency Theory and Global Leadership Contingency Theory and Global Leadership Global Leadership is a very challenging attribute due to the diversity in the global markets. This is because the global market accommodates diverse cultures, backgrounds, legislations, strategies, and objectives. Global organizations seek success in the modern global market despite the numerous and increasing complex set of challenges. As such, global leaders experience various challenges in trying to assess the demands of a situation given a global role. While operating in a face-to-face situation, a global leader face multicultural challenges in trying g to assess the demands of a...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Contingency Theory of Leadership/Empowerment

...Contingency Theories of Leadership Contingency theories of leadership stress upon the specific variables which belong to the environment which helps depict the leadership style that best suits a particular situation. The contingency theory does not render any style of leadership best-suited to all situations because it considers success to be controlled by a whole range of variables that include but are not limited to the qualities of followers, the style of leadership and different aspects of the situation. Situations affecting leadership from the Industrial Age to the Information Age The most prominent situations affecting leadership from the Industrial Age to the Information Age are those of the communication and the conflict... in the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The LMX and the Path-Goal Theory

... that he is a low performer for the organization. Path Goal TheoryPath Goal Theory is one of the theories of contingency theories that focus on how leaders can influence behavior of followers within an organization. The theory states that when followers are performing structured or tasks that have a set way of performing, followers does not need much assistance. On the other hand if followers are performing new and unstructured tasks they require ample amount of guidance from their leaders to perform such tasks. If a leader is implementing path goal theory to influence the behavior of their followers, they can do so by involving the followers in the process of making decisions for the organization (House, 1971). Transactional... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

Literary vs. Research Theory

...Literary versus Research theory Literary versus Research theory Literary theory refers to systems used by critics to read, explain and evaluate a piece of literature. Literature can be in the form of texts, either fictional or non fictional, documents of history, legal writings, advertisements and cultural events. Literary theory is subdivided into various schools of thought. The main focal point of each school of thought is used by critics to try and explain different kinds of literary work. One example of literary theory is Marxism. It is based on socioeconomics. Another example is the Darwinian Theory, based on modern synthesis of...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay


...Goal Setting and McClelland’s Theory A goal can be defined as a desired result that one or an organization plans and commits themselves by putting the necessary efforts to achieve them within a specific time. Goals usually describe what an individual wants to achieve and are categorized into short-term or long-term. Short-term goals are set to be achieved in a short period of time whereas long-term goals are objectives that one strives to achieve but in a longer span of time as compared to the short term. Effective goals should be achievable, clearly outlined for remembrance purposes, have the ability to adapt to changes...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Path-Goal Leadership Questionnaire

...Path Goal Leadership Questionnaire There is no such thing as a perfect leadership style (VAISHNAV, . Different situations require different leadership tactics to be followed. Even remaining within the bounds of the Path Goal Leadership Theory we find so many different leadership styles which can be followed. And so there is not really a special way of knowing whether you are employing the right leadership style or not. The only criterion for judging the accuracy and efficiency of your tactics and style is through analyzing the performance of your subordinate staff. Robert House’s Path Goal Leadership...
2 Pages(500 words)Personal Statement

Contingency Leadership Theory

...Critical Evaluation of a Contingency Leadership Theory Contingency means that one thing depends (i.e., is contingent) upon another thing (Naoum, 2001). Applied to leadership, it means that a leader may be effective in one situation, and not effective when the situation changes (Borkowski, 2009). The effectiveness of a leader depends upon the leader’s traits, the followers’ attributes (needs, maturity, training), and the situation itself including the task, organization, and environment (Daft, 2008). The difference between contingency leadership theory and the traditional leadership traits theory is that...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Fiedler Contingency Theory vs House-Path Goal Theory for FREE!

Contact Us