Critique of Rheumatic Arthritis Qualitative Research - Essay Example

? Critique of Rheumatic Arthritis Qualitative Research Introduction In giving health care services, there aredifferent things that are put into consideration. The domain of caring for the people with long-term conditions and means to enhance the life of such people is one of the most important ways to deliver services (Cowen and Moorhead, 2011, p34-38). People who suffer from health conditions that take long to cure are addressed in this domain of treatment as they involve different conditions of health and are given different medication overtime to recover their health. The domain analyses all the processes through which a person have to go to realize their better condition. The domain is chosen because in the process of treatment, patients are questioned about their condition and expert in healthcare are able to study the condition and prescribe care for them. The domain aims to make steady the state of patients (Mason-Whitehead, 2008, p14). This is the data acquired after researches done on patients (Nestor and Schutt, 2012, p24). Although the means to collect the data may not assure 100% credibility, it informs the kind of issues that happen to realise high quality of life. To obtain the qualitative data, a researcher interviews large group of people with the condition, only rheumatic arthritic victims were considered (Creswell, 2012, p.73). Main Body Evidence based practise is an approach in clinical care that is interdisciplinary and which is involved in assessing a condition of health from different angles before recommending the steps to be taken. Evidence based practise entails integration of the available evidence to practitioners and other resources to give the required care and promote health with the consideration of the affected (Lewenson and Truglio-Londrigan, 2008, p.18). This implies that circumstances should be looked at to establish the various factors that influence them. From the research evidence, that person will be able to make decisions. In health and social care, evidence based practice helps practitioners to choose the most appropriate care programme to implement on a patient. Through this, the sick are get quality care (Ellis, 2010 p43; Cashin and Cook, 2011 p33). The principles of evidence based practice are that the validity of a decision can only be verified only when research has been conducted in order to inform the situation. In enhancing the life of patient faced by rheumatic arthritis (RA), it is necessary to assess different means to provide care so that a person may be able to understand the issues that are related to provision of care (Madison, Sadowski and Savard, 2009, p87). In caring for patients with RA, evidence based practice provided a broad perspective in the information of the processes that work and those that do not assure good results. The domain for enhancing life for patients with long-term conditions is necessary to assess different care programmes that prevail in the process of health care (Eizenberg, 2011, p35). The research paper on the RA was used because choices of steps that are taken to mitigate the condition of the patients take some time to be carried out. The qualitative research evidence it provides can be used to understand the perspective through which people look at the medication they receive. In assessing the research paper on the RA patients, it is important to consider the various aspects of the research framework, which inform the whole paper. For example, it is important to consider the various areas of interest like the statement of goals, objectives as well as present the different issues that are important to the research. The statement of goals of study in a research paper was not done clearly. However, from inference, a reader is able to deduce the objective of the study, objective of the research was stated as a way to examine prescription for patients infected with RA. This step was inevitable to specify activities that can be carried out in order to come up with the evidence, the statement of goals of a research is important to because it focuses on areas to be tackled. This maintains its essence (Neuman, 2011, p56). In research, qualitative data is imperative as it determines the feelings of the participant in a research. The qualitative study provides the information that cannot be obtained when a researcher uses a quantitative method. Although qualitative data can be biased, a researcher can use different methods to ensure credibility of the information provided. This ensures that an interviewee can be consistent in answering the question (Nestor and Schutt, 2012, p125 and; Seale, 2011, p.63). The research design in the case of the RA was relevant to address the research questions that were raised by the researcher; it was considerable to get the intended information concerning the study. The research design also distributed the sources of information by choosing the most desirable research participants (Seale, 2011, p.27-33). The sampling process produced participants who where the number of men was very high as compared to that of men. For example, one man participated in the research as compared to 37 women. The selection of the age group was proper with all the participants falling between the age of 30 and 70 years. They were picked to warrant that the cases were less than one year from the time they started their diagnosis. The recruitment was done considering the rights of the people who were to participate. To include all the people, the medium to get participants randomly picked to ensure that all the people were represented. For example, the method of calling and sending e-mails was used to reach the people, and the qualities of those people who were required to take part in the research were made public. Some other qualified participants failed to participate in the research because the media used was not favourable to them (Turnbull, 2009, p35). In the research about RA, there were different methods that were used to collect the information that would answer the questions intended by the researcher. The questions were prepared in terms of topics that were discussed at various locations, and choices of various settings ensured convenience to as many participants as feasible. Data was collected in groups where the topics were discussed within a stipulated and the information was acquired for the response of participants (Madison, Sadowski, and Savard, 2009, p19). Later, a follow-up call was made to different participants to clarify some information that was given during the discussion. In the data collection method, people were recorded to ensure that they collect discussion was captured in the study. Also used in the data collection, structured interviews were used whereby the people were asked questions concerning their experience with their conditions (Peacock and Peacock, 2010 p.43). This process warranted that every participant were able to give information. The interviews that were applied in the research were the dictated by a topic guide that was formed by different experts in the field. Through this, persons answered questions in accordance to the people, the research activities were distributed to different firms. In the RA research, there were four different groups of researchers who were employed to carry out the research. This would ensure data was not misrepresented as a result of weaknesses of researchers. The researchers that were used included; AT, PA research coordinator and the rest of the interviews were conducted by some three students under the supervision of PA (Madison, Sadowski, and Savard, 2009, p169). The data was clarified by use of different methods of recording which were later transcribed. The data collected through these methods was to ensure that all the people were able to address the issues according to their desires. This data was very important in making analysis of the whole research project (Peacock and Peacock, 2010 p.91). People were invited to participate in the research through the internet, calls, emails, and during the discussion groups. This ensured that participants would have familiarised with the process during the study. This is because the process of RA research took a lot of time to be implemented. The relationship was established to such extent that all the people were able to exercise their choice. The research had formulated questions through a proper process that involved consultations. This scrutiny of questions to be asked during the interviews raised the quality of information that was required in the study. Through this, researchers accomplished their goals of their research (Madison, Sadowski, and Savard, 2009, p121-128). The process of data acquisition in the research started with a pilot study that was carried out prior to the main research. The success of the pilot study made the researchers to adopt their research design without making changes (Madison, Sadowski, and Savard, 2009, p89). The research tackled ethical matters through addressing things associated with the respect to the participants. As a matter of approval that the research process met the requirements, it was approved by the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board (Turnbull, 2009, p.12-15). The analysis of data in the RA research was done according to broader themes that were represented in the study. This meant that ideas were analysed according topics. This ensured that all the ideas which were related were properly addressed categorised together for analysis. The other analysis was subjected to analysis using nVivo 7 for storage and handling the large data sets. The research did not consider the events of contradictory data. The investigators involved themselves completely in the study (Kenney, 2009, p77). The findings of the research were presented in a clear way in the case that all the people were represented. As divergent to the categorization, the findings are clear in their discussion of issues; its results represent ideas that are not from the research. These were used to strengthen the discussion in support of the ideas and for giving explanation of some observations. This guaranteed credibility of the finding (Kenney, 2009, p27). The research is relevant because it addresses all the issues that face the treatment and care of the patients faced with RA (Williamson, 2010, p.5-12). The area of learning that should be investigated by future studies is the comparison of the different methods of programmes (Cowen and Moorhead, 2011 p12-19). Conclusion There are wide areas of study, which a research can take. This is in consideration to the different factors of the environment, which prevails in different places. Research should put into consideration the ethical issues so that data can be represented in a clear way. This ensures participants in a study are not influenced by different issues that are not favourable. Different ways of collecting and analysing data are important so that they can inform the proper presentation of the findings of the research. This means that the information can be represented in the body of knowledge as some of the information that is reliable to inform a phenomenon. In order to ensure that a research is completely applicable, a person should make relevant recommendation to the other researchers on areas that can be researched in future. The research on RA helped in giving recommendations about the issues related to care this research was important to ensure that the perspective of patients is always represented in their treatment. This also assists the care providers to recognise and to choose the most appropriate method of managing patients. It is a framework that is important and can be used to make analyses of similar study considering the systematic methods it used to acquire and analyse data which it obtained. References Cashin, A., & Cook, R. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing informatics: Concepts and applications. Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference. Cowen, P. S., & Moorhead, S. (2011). Current issues in nursing. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. Ellis, P. (2010). Evidence-based practice in nursing. Exeter, England: Learning Matters. Eizenberg, M. M., (2011) Implementation of Evidence-Based Nursing Practice:Nurses' Personal and professional Factors?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(1):33-42 Kenney, K. R. (2009). Visual communication research designs. New York: Routledge. Lewenson, S., & Truglio-Londrigan, M. (2008). Decision-making in nursing: Thoughtful approaches for practice. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Madison, C., Sadowski, V., & Savard, M. (2009). Recycle-mania: A triangulated analysis of recycling habits in the Machias area. Machias, ME: University of Maine at Machias. Mason-Whitehead, E. (2008). Key concepts in nursing. Los Angeles: SAGE. Nestor, P. G., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Research methods in psycholog: Investigating human behavior. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, Mass: Pearson. Peacock, J., & Peacock, P. (2010). Oxford Handbook of Medical Statistics. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Seale, C. (2011). Researching society and culture. London: SAGE. Turnbull, P. (2009). Informed consent. Sutton: Severn House. Williamson, G., (2010) Contexts of Contemporary Nursing (2nd ed), Exeter  Learning Matters. Read More