Research Article - Speech or Presentation Example

The research investigates an area that is of human interest thus earns efficacy to a bigger percentage of the population. Research is information additional tool; however, in the information addition process, the research needs to identify an area lacking in the information. The researcher does this by identifying the lapses in the maintenance of the quality of life by spinal cord injuries victim. The effective titles therefore fore forms the first strength f the research paper since it earns relevance and the information it seeks to provide have direct relevance to the population. Additionally, the research has a number of strengths in the research data collection and computation. The research uses the cluster sampling technique known for its cost effectiveness in the identification of the research participants. An effective selection of the research participants gives an effective representation of the research target audience thus authenticating the claims of the new information. The cluster sampling techniques groups similar respondents together thereby making them easily accessible to the researcher. Additionally, the research employs the three different data collection techniques a feature that pools together the strengths of the three techniques thus making the research more effective. The use of a sample representation gains its validity from the impossibility of investigating every member of the public targeted by the research, the researcher therefore defines the research title and formulates a scope of the study. With these, he or she therefore devises ways of accessing the respondents and using their responses to allude to the rest of similar population. Additionally, the research uses graphical presentation of its finding. This does not only make the research more presentable but also makes the interpretation of the research. This makes the research more effective and relevant for public consumption. The research uses graphs and charts to present the research findings besides the tables. This makes comparison of the research findings easier and is therefore one of the greatest strengths of the research. The researcher follows the conventional research formats by giving a detailed explanation of the research background. This develops the information need that the researcher therefore seeks to satisfy by conducting the research. Through the elaborative background, the researcher provides a link between Neurogenic Bowel in spinal cord injuries and the quality of life that such member of the society lead. This descriptive introduction gains relevance for the research and the different methodologies that the researcher uses in developing his arguments in the conclusion. The research had a number of weaknesses too key among which included cluster sampling methodology. Despite being cost effective, the sampling technology hastily generalizes the respondents a feature that makes the research less relevant to the target population. Additionally, the use of the three data gathering techniques is also redundant and makes the research repetitive thus time consuming. The use of questionnaires is largely similar to the use of interview in most cases, the researcher employs the two concurrently which makes the research process more costly and more repetitive. However, the descriptive research methodology that the researcher employs has a number of weaknesses all of which influence the effectiveness of the research findings thus the efficacy of the conclusion statement. This research structure is normally more theoretical in the description of the effects of the research variables in which case are the Neurogenic Bowel in spinal cord injuries and the quality of life. Both of the concepts in this research that constitute the variables are abstract and the researcher does not interpret these into effective mathematically computable variables. The failure by the researcher to achieve this makes the research process less legitimate, the researcher understands this and therefore provides an elaborate literature reviews to his research. Such a lengthy and conclusive literature review makes the research methodology a content analysis type of research, which does not depend on the research respondents to create the link, argued of earlier. Researches are normally subject to human biases and this research presents a number of personal biases. In the formulation of the research questions, the researchers are normally likely to form a bias by trying to formulate an answer to the question thus assimilating a mindset with which to collect the data. In this context, the researcher is convinced that there is a link between Neurogenic Bowel in spinal cord injuries and the quality of life of such patients. He thus carries out a research to authenticate the claims. He further tries to piece all the facts available to prove his claims, hiss analysis of the existing literature is biased and shows preference to the link and this denies the research an integrity presented by the facts. Researches add information to the already existing pool, this however is not achievable if the researcher’s view of the information deficit if influenced by a pre-established mindset. The researcher therefore manipulates the research findings to fit his own previous claims in the thesis statement. Ethics refers to the ability to make a conscious decision between rights and wrong, there is no substantive definition of ethics since it depends on personal conducts. This implies that the researcher should carry himself out full conscious of his or her actions. With an understanding of how these actions, affect the life of the respondent. Neurogenic bowel is a condition in which the spinal cord injury patients witness a difficulty with the process of removing stool. This normally breeds embarrassment in patients and the researcher therefore needs to approach the respondents with caution and not stigmatize them. It is also possible for some patients to refuse to contribute in such a study owing to the stigmatizing effects of the research. The researchers conduct their research ethically by asking friendly and effectively packaged questions to their respondents thus not hurting their personality. The research further presents a number of ethical concerns. Investigating the sick requires a lot of caution as any reckless handling or a careless assertion may hurt their personality thus hinder their recovery process. The research however requires the active participation of the patients in different stages of the recovery process. The thesis statement claims that the neurogenic bowel improves the quality of life of such patients. To prove this the researcher requires the removal of such life supporting structure from a control sample a scenario which interferes with the recovery process and may even prove fatal in some cases. Furthermore no reasonable patient would agree to such an undertaking an occurrence which denies the research all legitimacy. Researches should provide elaborate relationship between theory and the actual practice thus creates new information from the existing. The researcher understands this and provides an elaborate literature review section, in this he analyses the existing information on the spinal injury and the recovery process. He also analyses the quality of life of such patients and the role that the neurogenic bowel plays improving the quality of life of such patients. In this section, the researchers makes legitimate his claim by refer to previous information published by other scholars. He later provides a link between the preexisting information and practice by conducting the actual research in which he investigates the effects of the syndrome in the quality of life of spinal injury patients (Pardee et al, 2012). The research investigates the life of spinal injury patients and the tendency off the occurrence of the neurogenic bowel, a condition in which spinal cord injury patients experience difficulties removing stool. This implies that nurses perform more to keep the patients safe from acquiring other opportunistic infections related to such complications. With the claims that without effective care every spinal cord injury case has a potential of acquiring the condition, the research therefore prepares researchers psychologically for the increased task that arises with the secondary acquisition of such complications. The research further provides evidence based practice to nurses to outling themost appropraie ways of offering psychoanalysis to the spinal cord injury patients thus hastening their recovery process while reducing their chances of acquiring neurogenic bowel. It further leborates the nature of services that patients with both compications require and the effects of psychological assurenece in minimisung the occurance of the secondary comolication with its associated complications. In retrospect, the research is of relevance to the practice of nursing since it deices ways of effective patient management. References Pardee, C., Bricker, D., Rundquist, J. MacRae., C & Tebben, C. (2012). Characteristics of Neurogenic Bowel in Spinal Cord Injury and Perceived Quality of Life. Nursing 37. 3: 128-35. Read More