By visualizing the impact of their conduct on others and determine how others react, whether favorably or adversely, they are in a position to remold their behavior if they chose to. Thus it could be said that aspects of gender, race and class are intrinsic to social mores, “are part of all social existence” and are achieved in consonance and not in isolation, or separation. (Messerschmidt, 1997). All the three, gender class and race exert significant impact and implications on actions, and are determined by such actions.
The aspects of gender race and class would be in terms of white masculine master, non-white male slave, white female owner, etc. Throughout recorded history of the US , aspects of white and non white polarization are evident in that the whites ruled over the non-whites. The hegemony wielded over non whites stemmed from supremacy of whites and their subjugation of poorer and economic despondent non whites. The structured action theory could be seen in terms of actions taken, by police in dispersing a person, who may be suspected of criminal gang membership, from a group, standing in a place, whose actions or inactions may hide criminal intents.
Therefore, it could be said that the determination of whether a person is a criminal or a law abiding citizens has to be judged on a number of factors, and not just based on singular fact. As it is commonly seen, people regularly take part in self controlling constructs, thus being in a position to regulate their own acts, and could also monitor actions of others. Viewed in this context, it would be sans impossible to distinguish a criminal from a peacemaker as would be “the inseparability of structure and action and the situational salience of constructing gender.
” (Messerschmidt, 2008). It could work out in both ways. The unintended consequences would be a greater degree of violence and street unrest, especially if the police adopt high handed
...Download file to see next pages Read More