On the other hand, these very leaders are also the ones who pursue a more just and fair set of political policies. With this dilemma at hand, the question now lies on whether a democratic political leadership upholds justice or injustice, towards the betterment of mankind? When President George W. Bush of the United States of America waged the war against terrorism, its administration’s main agenda was to stop the Afghan forces from producing weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, Bush also initiated the agenda in destroying the breeding network of Muslim people of the Al Qaeda, topple down the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein of Iraq, and the continued search of Osama Bin Laden and the Talibans involved in the Twin Tower and Pentagon bombings also called 9/11 attacks.
Indeed, the country has succeeded in penetrating Afghanistan, and Iraq’s dictatorial government. On the other hand, unknown to most Americans, the war waged against terrorism was mainly viewed as an act of injustice on the part of Bush’ leadership in “supposedly” alleviating the nuclear bomb production of Afghanistan and Iraq. Instead of looking for nuclear bombs, the United States figured into numerous controversies, following the reported crimes committed by the US Army against the locals of Iraq, paving way for other countries to join the war against Iraq and Afghanistan, and the hidden agenda of the United States to control the oil industry (starting from Iraq and Afghanistan).
In the aftermath of the war, President Bush was said to have apologized for overreacting against the weapons of mass destruction. Sorry folks, there were no such weapons of after all! He justified such move in an effort to uphold its status of being “the police of the world,” while bringing about clear cut policies for the United Nations’ to uphold. Noting that the United Nations was the very institution who was against such
...Download file to see next pages Read More