Curriculum Design Analysis - Essay Example

Prior studies have acknowledged that GCSE students have limited knowledge of science (i.e., concerning medicine and drugs) with no positive reception of the responsibility played by scientists' ideas in guiding inquiry. Therefore, this study tests the argument that the GCSE students can make significant progress in developing a more refined, constructivist epistemology of science if given a Kagan structure was used in the school science curriculum (Kagan, 2004,p.1606). In this essay, I chose to objectively discuss the Kagan structure on cooperative learning versus independent learning.

In this case, the two-class units taught will be medicine and drugs using the two methods to determine which one is more effective (Kagan, 2008,p.5). This will help to provide information concerning how GCSE students can further progress in methods of teaching. On the same note, the essay will help one to identify the aims of what is to be discovered and achieved. Also, there will be a reflective account and discussions of findings and data analysis based on engagement, attitude, and motivation. The rationale behind this Kagan structure is that those teachers who try it find it easy to make their students understand learning procedures and it also makes it easier for teachers to teach.

Teachers confess that the structures have made more difference than any other innovation in teaching methods. Students, on the other hand, say that they are fun to use while administrators report that it has led to positive outcomes for their schools and districts. In fact, the structures foster a wide range of skills and virtues allowing learners to function successfully and with dignity in all of their life situations. This has helped in developing the whole student by inculcating thinking skills, social character, and social skills into the learners.