The Challenge In The Community IPE Event, Supported By The Management And Sociology Workshop - Essay Example

Reflection Account 2 P number: 11260094 Module HCSC2000 of the assignment: ‘REFLECTION ACCOUNT 2, THE CHALLENGE IN THE COMMUNITY IPE EVENT, SUPPORTED BY THE MANAGEMENT AND SOCIOLOGY WORKSHOP’ Introduction In this reflection, Gibbs model will be used to assist in the study. The model is popular among health professionals. It is one of the most efficient approaches that are able to provide descriptive, analytic as well as evaluative experiences, thus enabling the practitioners to make sense of the experiences that they obtain. Its components include descriptive, feelings and analysis. First, it is important to understand that Gibbs model as a reflective practice has been associated with leaning based on the experiences and in its entirety, has always played a very significant role as a strategy used by professionals as a lifelong learning. The practice is also credited for being a process that promotes quality of care and catalyzes professional and personal growth and thus bridges the gap between practice and theory. To this end, the paper will examine the IPE challenge and relate it with the Gibbs model. Inter-professional education (IPE) involves students from different health disciplines engaging in practice learning through mentorship and collaborative activities. It plays a vital role in educating and developing healthcare professionals (Carpenter, & Dickinson, 2008).This reflective writing is based on the challenge in the community IPE event and it is supported by the sociology and management workshop. Gibbs reflective cycle will be used in this paper. Gibbs cycle involves six stage approaches to learning, this include description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion and action plan. Description On 31st of March, as an audiologist, I attended the IPE event challenge in the community together with different healthcare professionals such as Social workers, Nurses, Pharmacists, physiotherapists and respiratory technicians. The aims was to work as professionals in our own fields and identify the best professional relationships to ensure that service users get the desired quality services. This event took place in De Montfort University (DMU) at the camps center. There were several things that I learned from the event. First, the aspect of working with a multidisciplinary team was clearly presented. I learned that by working as a team high quality care is achieved than working individually. Further, the event enabled me to acquire the ability to work well within a team. Broadly this event exposed me to work with other healthcare professionals so that service users are able to benefit in a more effective manner. It was also important to learn that effective communication with other professional can improve healthcare outcomes for service users (Bridges, D. et al., 2011). One of the strategies that were instilled in the event was the ability to look at the patient in a more holistic way. Feelings I felt that the event played a significant role in my training as an audiologist; it managed to arouse some empathetic feelings towards patients. Considering the situations that were presented, the process revealed to me the important roles of other healthcarepractitioners. When the teams got together in order to go through the event, I felt so nervous at first. Eventually, I became confident in the whole process. Throughout the process, particularly when the case of John was presented, I felt concerned. The situation got slightly had for me to comprehend when I realized that he was not only struggling with the grief after the death of the wife, but was also unforgiving to Thomas considering that Thomas had married against his wish. I felt shocked when I heard that Thomas had died. This is because apart from his new medical condition, which needed close attention from the family members, he also had to deal with reconstruction of his relationship with Shira. This presented us with a new challenge as a team since we had to develop a new plan for John’s family. Generally, throughout the event, I felt that the program broadened my mind as a student professional in educative manner. Evaluation There were also other sections that I felt did not go right. These areas did not only come as challenges, but also as lessons learned for future similar exercise. One of the things that I noted not to have gone as planned was the fact that we did not agree on certain things. When the groups did not agree, it was necessary that middle ground be sought, just to ensure that progress was made. There was a serious red-tape presented by the fact that diverse opinions presented by the team members revealed severe weakness of the team and created tentative multiple centers of power. This made decision making to take longer time than would be necessary. Another problem that directly exposed us to failure was the fact that at the point of building the tower, there was no discussion that was made between us. Every professional student was working on his or her own. This meant that there was a communication barrier between the professional students. We also failed to follow the team roles as was presented by Belbin. Belbin has identified 9 team roles, which include; plant, resource investigator, coordinator, sharper, monitor- evaluator, team worker, implementer, completer and a specialist. This means that we were not able to identify those areas that individual team members were best at and harness the best contributions that they would bring on board in the process of IPE challenge. Had this model been followed, then failure in the building of the tower would not have been a problem at all. The group analysis would have been successfully done and the ideas that were presented by the team members would have been put into practice. There was also slow conception of the ideas presented by members of the team. This could be easily attributed to the fact that bringing together different perspectives and synthesizing those individual perspectives on the same matter. This was one of the most pronounced problems that were evident in the whole of the IPE event. There are a number of things that I believe went along well. The following are a number of things I regard to have been good things from the IPE challenge in the community event. First; there was a new learning in my side from the team. Some of the new things I leant included the psychological treatment plans that can always be used as an alternative to pharmaceutical treatment plan. I could now comfortably claim that my role as an audiologist depended on the views of other professionals, to ensure that the well-being of the client was ascertained. Apart from the efforts to achieve the objectives of the event, academically, a lot of salient areas were presented to me, which made it possible for me to widen my academic scope. I also felt challenged in my on field as an audiologist, which so far has prompted me to view things differently. I therefore was able to borrow a lot that I believe would be able to complement things that I have been taught as an audiologist. I also learnt teamwork especially with diverse personality. Teamwork was an essential aspect of the event since one had to appreciate turn taking, so that others would also express themselves while giving their opinion in the same concept. (Goldberg, L.R. et al., 2010) As a team, we were also able to develop a holistic production of a presentation for our case study. Our presentation was inclusive, with varied opinions within the presentation. This was also one of the things that I believe was good in the whole of the event. I was also impressed with the feedback which we got from the event coordinators. They had indicated that we had done exemplary work during the process and that the areas we needed to correct were minimal. Analysis The case of John is a complex situation that requires examination not only on individual capacity, but also in relation to the existing social capital that he enjoyed. Giving John’s case as sociological perspective, what he had gone through would be attributed to a sick role, particularly that which had been assumed by Thomas because of the condition of the father. This was also the same case with John, who had been depressed because of the wife’s death. The situation through which John was undergoing exposed him to a situation of dying. Individuals who are aged and have diseases like cancer may be classified as those under special population and because of that, would need to have special attention. From my own understanding, I believe that much of the caring needed to take place with his caregivers, who were Thomas family. Though my role as an audiologist did not come strongly in this process, it was clear that at such point there was a need to appreciate the roles of the psychotherapist. From my understanding, based on the detailed discussions that we had, in our team, a psychotherapist needs to coach and orient Thomas’ family and to show them how they can handle him during this time of pain and illness. I also believe that the input of the nurse was needed. Nurse, being a primary healthcare provider, would be in a position to help John and the entire family with the things that they need to care. It should not be forgotten that Thomas himself was aged and needed the support of the children to help the family grow in a healthy condition. After the death of Thomas, John was certainly placed into disarray. For instance, after the death of Thomas, John was being carried by Shira, who did not mind the hatred that John had always showed her. There were several lessons that I could draw from this situation, including the fact that sometimes, as professionals, we need to treat people equally with utmost respect, while consistently upholding their dignity all the times. This should go beyond the dogmas that we hold against others, whether on the ground of economic disparities, social standings, or any other factor. The incorporation of the pharmacist gives a sustainable treatment plan. John as at now is facing multiple situation and would most likely be diagnosed with cormobidity. When individuals suffer from multiple conditions ranging from grief to physical health, they have high chance of being diagnosed with cormobidity. This is where the role of psychotherapist borders that of a pharmacist. Action Plan In the event that the similar event occurs again, I will endeavor to ensure that I place some measures that would not only avoid the possible mistakes, but also cub the loopholes that would be experienced by me as an individual as well as by the group. I also figured out that proper planning would assist in the reduction of the time lost through incongruence of ideas and therefore, this would be an area to consider in future. Conclusion Giving it a broad spectrum evaluation, the event provided me with an opportunity to educate and to open my mind in my career. I was convinced that as professionals, we were poised to provide excellent service to our patients, when we appreciated the roles of other professionals and also got alive to the fact that our patients would not necessarily come from a similar economic or social background. It was also clearer to me that there was always a need to coordinate with each other and to understand that as healthcare providers, we were working as a system, and that each one of us had a responsibility to ensure that other parts of the system functioned appropriately. In future, critical issues need to be addressed before making the groupings, for examples, roles should be clearly followed and individual students professionals should have their responsibilities demarcated appropriately. This would thus assist the team to hasten the process of decision making. References BARR, H. (2005). Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption, and evidence. Oxford, Blackwell Pub. Barr, H., (1994). Chapter 5: NVQs and their implications for inter-professional collaboration. Cameron, A., (2011) Impermeable boundaries?Developments in professional and inter-professional practice.Journal of interprofessional care, 25(1), p.53-58. CARPENTER, J., & DICKINSON, H. (2008).Interprofessional education and training. Bristol [England], Policy. FORMAN, D., JONES, M., & THISTLETHWAITE, J. (2014).Leadership development for interprofessional education and collaborative practice. FREETH, D. (2007). Interprofessional education. Edinburgh, Association of the Study of Medical Education. FRESHMAN, B., RUBINO, L., & CHASSIAKOS, Y. R. (2010).Collaboration across the disciplines in health care.Sudbury, Mass, Jones and Bartlett Publishers. GEVA, E., BARSKY, A. E., & WESTERNOFF, F. (2000).Interprofessional practice with diverse populations cases in point. Westport, Conn, Auburn House. Goldberg, L.R. et al., 2010. Infusing an inter‐professional and inter‐university perspective into healthcare education. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), p.421-431. Goldberg, L.R. et al., (2010). Infusing an inter‐professional and inter‐university perspective into healthcare education. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), p.421-431. Hudson, B., (2006). Integrated Team Working Part II: Making the Inter-Agency Connections. Journal of Integrated Care, 14(2), p.26-36. Janků, P., Janků, K. &Unzeitig, V., (2009).Pre-eclampsia from the perspective of inter-professional collaboration.Vnitrnilekarstvi, 55(12), p.1159-1166. Keshmiri, F. et al., (2013). Inter-professional ethics education in team-based approach: values and ethics development in inter-professional collaboration. KNAPP, M. S. (1998). Paths to partnership: university and community as learners in interprofessional education. Lanham, Md, Rowman& Littlefield Publishers. Kreitzer, M.J., Kligler, B. & Meeker, W.C., 2009. Health Professions Education and Integrative Healthcare.Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 5(4), p.212-227. LEARNING AND TEACHING SUPPORT NETWORK. (2002). Interprofessional education: today, yesterday and tomorrow. Loughborough, LTSN for Health, Sciences and Practice. Masterson, A., 2007. Community matrons: inter-professional and inter-agency working (part five). Nursing older people, 19(8), p.38-40. MCCROSKEY, J., & EINBINDER, S. D. (1998).Universities and communities remaking professional and interprofessional education for the next century.Westport, Conn, Praeger. OCALLAGHAN, P. (1997). Values in conflict: an interdisciplinary approach. Lanham, Md, University Press of America. Smith, M. et al., 2006. Intra-professional and inter-professional referral patterns of chiropractors. Chiropractic & osteopathy, 14, p.12. SOOTHILL, K., MACKAY, L., & WEBB, C. (1995).Interprofessional relations in health care. London, E. Arnold. Starfield, B., Shi, L. &Macinko, J., 2005.Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.Milbank Q, 83(3), p.457-502. Stead, J., Lloyd, G. & Kendrick, A., 2004. Participation or Practice Innovation: Tensions in Inter-agency Working to Address Disciplinary Exclusion from School. Children and Society, 18(1), p.42-52. WATANABE, H., & KOIZUMI, M. (2010).Advanced initiatives in interprofessional education in Japan JapanInterprofessional Working and Education Network. Read More