School Shootings in America - Case Study Example

SCHOOL SHOOTINGS AND FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH- CASE STUDY School shootings in America have been a recent trauma for every one living across the world. It is shocking to know that these children can be so dangerous in nature when they have a gun in their hand. They do not realize the importance of life. The parents are equally responsible for them because a child cannot get a gun by himself or herself if he or she does not have the access to it in their home. The case study mainly involves a focus group of 12 parents. Out of the twelve, seven finally turn up for the discussion. The researcher then asks them to discuss their view points about the recent school shootings. There are varied views by different parents. Some are completely horrified and terrified about the whole issue and feel that immediate steps need to be taken in order to keep this issue into control. On the other hand, there are parents who are not so much bothered about this whole thing and feel it is not really such a big matter to fuss about. Some of them were of the view that children do it in order to come into the limelight. Introduction School-related shootings, especially those that are memorable in nature, summon solid open objection, and reasonably so. Accompanying a clear spate of occurrences happening between 1997 and 2001, it appeared to be as though the USA was on the verge of an ethical frenzy concerning misconduct and agnostic youth society. From that point forward, Columbine has turned into a pivotal word for a mind boggling set of feelings encompassing youth, hazard, fear, and wrongdoing in 21st century America. One scholar headed off so far as to mark Columbine as similar for a contemporary emergency of youth society. Slicing through the buildup and open feeling about school shooting, out of sight social researchers have been grinding away in attempting to tease out the changing measurements of this sensation. Regardless of the generally diffused differences and trepidation connected with roughness in schools, experimental confirmation demonstrates that schools are around the most secure spots for youngsters, contrasted with their homes and neighborhood environs. Discussion The case study mainly involves a focus group of 12 parents. Out of the twelve, seven finally turn up for the discussion. The researcher then asks them to discuss their view points about the recent school shootings. There are varied views by different parents. Some are completely horrified and terrified about the whole issue and feel that immediate steps need to be taken in order to keep this issue into control. On the other there are parents who are not so much bothered about this whole thing and feel it is not really such a big matter to fuss about. Some of them were of the view that children do it in order to come into the limelight. They have their deep desire to use fire arms as shown in Hollywood movies. Gradually the parents start going off the topic and start talking about their children when the researcher interrupts and asks them not to deviate and stick to matter of discussion (Dworkin, 2007). The parents were often stopped by the research in order to contain them in the discussion however parents were getting emotionally diverted from them. The real issues which we need to focus into are our children as the crimes are being committed by them. So if we need to stop it we need to handle them accordingly. The time of your kid will have any kind of effect by the way you have to respond. Preschoolers through age five may have seen writes about the news. Start by saying that it looks really alarming, isnt that right? What do you make out of it?" For school age kids, inquire as to whether they have seen the reports and discuss your own particular emotions by saying, "Im extremely pitiful for those individuals and their families." Go on to talk about that it is essential not to let what happened panic us so much that we dont have some good times and delight in our lives. Recall that junior youngsters respond to a great extent to the disposition and passionate reactions of those around them. The significance of an occasion for youngsters is drawn more altogether from the responses of others than from the occasion itself (Pitzer, 1999). With additional senior children and high school students, it is all the more influential to examine your own particular specific feelings first. When you grant your estimations, it may help your immature to examine the disaster and their particular specific emotions of trepidation. For climbing adult individuals on school offices you can similarly discuss the security systems of their specific grounds. It is basic for adolescents of all ages to be comforted about their own particular specific wellbeing. It is paramount to converse with your adolescent about school roughness if they are at home or going to school, and listen to his or her musings and concerns on this issue. The accompanying are a few themes to talk about with more kids and the teenagers identified with school savagery: It is alright to express fear at what has been going on and sympathy for the learners and families who have survived this disaster. Explain the refinement between being not the same as different learners and having intense issues that prompt amazing brutality (Olson, 2005). Express to your adolescent that it is so critical to fill you or an alternate grown-up in as to whether they hear an alternate understudy undermining brutality towards him or others. Talk about what it may feel like to be a pariah at school, and discover if your youngster is having inconvenience fitting in. talk with your adolescent about taking care of issues helpfully and calmly; help them to discover fitting answers for issues without utilizing (Newman, 2013). Conclusion Some youngsters may extol this disaster by saying it was "cool." We have to keep on emphasizing the inadmissibility of viciousness to settle issues or tackle issues. We have to continue pushing with youngsters and teenagers that brutality does not work. Youngsters who are troubled may act in ways that arent unmistakably associated with the occasion. They may mope, be peevish or be forceful. As a guardian, be accessible after some time. For a few children, these sentiments wont recuperate quickly. Despite the fact that the news has been loaded with reports of the later school shooting, accentuate that the dominant part of kids are protected at school. This approach by the research to conduct a discussion in a focus group is typically democratic in nature though it may not help him or her to come up with a suitable conclusion because over here the parents are being interviewed but we need to understand the Child’s mentality because they are the person who are actually involved in the crime (The Bully Society School Shootings and the Crisis of Bullying in Americas Schools, 2012). Understanding them and controlling them will help us in preventing the crimes further. References Dworkin, J. (2007). What if the next shooting is at my school? Teen Talk: A survival guide for parents of teenagers. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension. Pitzer, R. (1999). Parents should talk to children about school shootings. University of Minnesota Extension Service. Olson, K. (2005). Parents should talk to children about school shootings. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension Service. Newman, K. S. (2013). Roots of a Rampage. Nation, 296(1/2), 4-8. The Bully Society School Shootings and the Crisis of Bullying in Americas Schools. (2012). Kirkus Reviews, 80(1), 2408-2409 Read More