Complex Small Electronic Cochlear Implants - Case Study Example

The research, however, intends to uptake cochlear implants in various regions within different communities to be able to identify signs of cochlear implant devices regarding stigmatization and acceptance within these communities.

Cochlear implant devices help children to communicate with others efficiently. It gets hard for a child to communicate around when he or she does not have a cochlear implant device. However, stigmatization within the different communities at times prevails among this family with deaf people. Some communities, however, disapprove of the implantation of cochlear devices terming it a non-correspondent virtue. Virtue ethics is the applied theory since deaf children without cochlear implants and living in the Deaf community usually get a hard time communicating as far as the issue of the cochlear devices is concerned.
According to the research, it has been known that this device has regulated the issue of deafness within different communities, and any community against the cochlear implant decision not only disapproves of the exercise but also needs the deafness issue to prevail at large.

Virtue ethics is the applied theory since deaf children without cochlear implants and living in the Deaf community usually get a hard time communicating as far as the issue of the cochlear devices is concerned. According to the research, it has been known that this device has regulated the issue of deafness within different communities. In the categories, there is only one group for development, kind of jumping to the conclusion that the community is useless and that they want to develop their instrument. However, they intend to have a fifth group address the benefits of keeping the children deaf or not. The only way to develop the instrument is to compare deaf children with non-deaf children.

In regards to collecting data, the study is performed on children who are not yet
Born, and they do not know if they are deaf or not. There is a need for a source stating that there is no difference in capability in communicating and expressive and responding.