All forms of government welfare should be abolished - Essay Example

In such a situation, the government has to make budgetary estimates on how they are going to finance the basic needs that will be supplied to the poor people. From a humanitarian point of view, this is a prudent decision by the government. It has to make sure that all people are comfortable by supplying the needy with food, healthcare, housing and other basic needs like education (Conn, 2012). Secondly, the government is mandated to ensure there is fair distribution and redistribution of wealth and resources to all the people.

Some people in the society are endowed with resources, while others are languishing in abject poverty. This creates a situation where on one end; there is a surplus on resources, while on the other hand resources are scarce. To make a fair distribution, the rich and well-to-do with have to assist the others. This creates a fair scenario where all people are served on equal grounds in regard to supply of resources. In my opinion, government welfares should not be abolished. However, they should be controlled effectively.

For instance, they should be vigilant in detecting people that genuinely need the program. This will reduce the number of people that are depending on the government welfare. With such control, it is possible that the government welfare expenditure will reduce, which will in return reduce the budget for government welfare. There are many forms of government welfare programs existing in the present world, with each having its function. These financial strategies are used to uplift the livelihood of some people in the society.

Some of these people include disabled and poor people in the society. Government welfares have been criticized and risk been abolished citing that the rationale for giving the government welfare is not well structured. The opposition to the government welfare programs has cited various key points that should be considered.