The Political System - Essay Example

 The political system in any state has been known to influence other factors such as the economic welfare of a state and public welfare among other issues. It has been therefore considered important to ensure stable political times and reign in most states. However, the process of political reforms is challenging and the citizen in most states plays a big role in the type of leadership they form or the public policy governance they want. In the United States, the two-party system in my opinion is constructive with respect to policy for the good of the public but still has weighed the challenges to governance. The two-party system limits more party entrances and thus limits flexibility on the part of the decision-making process. However, based on public policy, the system promotes transparency with regard to the use of public resources where both parties are accountable. In consideration of the various stakeholders in the policy process, the system though limited in representation is able to diffuse resources effectively without external interference.

 Democracy is essential since the voters have been empowered to choose whoever they want and thus the government represents what the voters chose. To some extent,  the growth and influence of the independent voter is constructive because it represents the type of governor they want. If good, then the voter has played a good role in being informed and choosing a good leader which is constructive to govern. However, the growth of the independent voter might have been out of coercion or incentive which may influence the decision-making and eventually poor leadership. This translates to a bad policy process where resources may be utilized by a few elites.

 The growth and influence of private corporations are a challenge to governance in that it has raised interest groups as a form of government. As a result, it has led to corruption, mismanagement, and collusion of regulation and enforcement. Apart from that the interest groups may have led to proper representations and thus good policy for the public interests.

The influence of lobbyists is constructive to govern and may still pose a threat. Lobby groups such as AARP and NRA have been known to raise chaos and eliminate people from office or being voted in. They are also responsible for the equitable distribution of resources to the marginalized regions thus promoting good governance and better policy for the public good. They have promoted problem identification, intervention strategies, implementation, and evaluation with regard to resources and represented the individual citizens to achieve access, voice, power, and responsiveness.

 Yes. In my opinion, the governor system and policy process are responsive to the American people in terms of deciding for the public good. Firstly, the policy process considers basic areas such as the political frameworks, public values, policy analysis, and categories that form the basis of policy making. In this case, all parties including the lobbyists, interest groups, the elite, and even the poor in the society are included in the bracket. Besides this the governance, though not perfect remains open to debate and thus the citizen can express their views and voice the type of government they want. Despite some cases of corruption in certain circles, the government still tries to focus on key policy sectors such as taxes, safety, welfare, and education among other notable factors.