Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Decisions to pay tax are determined mainly by politics figures that need the tax money to be contributed so that various programs they hope to accomplish are completed. Decisions that are…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process"

Download file to see previous pages Power rifts that exist between the legislative and executive branches of government on who is to make decisions also affects citizen, a lot of time is wasted of formulating budgets and it makes it even worse that incase of any changes that are made, long bureaucratic lines have to be made to ensure that the right authority is given. This rift has proven to cause the citizens negatively since as the branches take time to process their budgetary terms, the citizens continue paying the taxes and taking a longer time to get entitlement programs.
As citizens, they are entitled to getting grants, loans, operating and capital budgets, but this becomes either easy or hard depending on the process it takes for approval and which program one is applying for. Entitlement programs are given on the basis of how many people or organizations actually meet the requirements of getting the programs. This also is dependant on he government that the person or organization is under since the state and local governments budget on a separately for operating expenses and budgets (S.Rubin).
Decisions made that make the budgeting process vary from one state to another easily affects the citizens. Most citizens are likely to live in one state and work in another or be in a situation where their families live in a different state from the one their working in. A good example as explained in the chapter in the difference in budget processes between the state of Texas and Georgia where in Texas the legislative budget board and the governor works together in the budget planning process. Here citizens have to ensure that their application comply with standards of the board and the governor. In Georgia however the process is made easier for the citizens since the legislative institutions have no role in discussing the budget process. With this example it ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process Essay”, n.d.)
Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process Essay. Retrieved from
(Litigating a Tax Matter--the Judicial Process Essay)
Litigating a Tax Matter--the Judicial Process Essay.
“Litigating a Tax Matter--the Judicial Process Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process

Nationality and international judicial process

...?Nationality and international judicial process Insert Insert Grade Insert Introduction Mutual relational consent by individual to country explains “nationality”. How can nationality exist without state and the subject? A state offers legal protection and expects the individual to give back through committing onto state obligations. Through this, state poses jurisdictions the subject while he/she is accorded protection. Subjects are obliged to entitlement of privileges provided by virtual of belonging. There should be no limitation into individual efforts in acquiring nationality or properly too while changing it. It is designed to be an easy task when a person applies for nationality in a country more so...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Judicial Process

...? Juvenile offenders transferred into adult criminal court jurisdiction Introduction Significant changes in judicial processes in recent times have lead to a growing number of juveniles being transferred to adult criminal courts. The surge in the number has been because of escalation in juvenile violent crimes, declining confidence in the juvenile courts to punish serious offences, and a general move towards punishment as opposed to personal rehabilitation. Additionally adult criminal sentencing in most states has been streamlined due to claims that initially the system was lenient to violent criminals. This has lead to juveniles being punished under adult criminal sentencing guidelines, which is more...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism

...Judicial Activism Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two terms which are bandied about on both sides of the spectrum. Conservatives decry judicial activism. They state that judges should not make law, only interpret the law. However, this is hypocrisy, because conservatives do not seem to mind activism when it comes to issues that they believe in. For instance, in Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 (2000), which is the ultimate case of judicial activism, conservatives did not decry this case as being a case of judicial activism. But, if one reads the opinion, it is clear that the judges are straining to find reasons for the decision, and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

DNA & The Judicial System

...from the defendant’s watch during the pre-trial hearing. The court acknowledged that DNA identification Theory, techniques and practice are generally accepted in the scientific community (Zhu, 2009). Pre-trial hearings were required to determine whether methodology used by the testing laboratory was in line with scientific procedures and standards that could produce reliable evidence for the consideration of the jury. The procedures and methodology used in the laboratory were in question and it failed to prove that the standards were of judicial acceptance and consideration. The court ruled that the blood sample was indeed for Castro, but upheld that the DNA test was for exclusion and not inclusion. In the view of the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Due process judicial review regulatory process administrative hearing

...that the solutions provided are reasonable and to an extent convenient to both parties (Amar 1194). The same cannot be said of the judicial courts which in most cases reserve the right to make the final decisions after submission from both parties involved in the dispute. The second advantage is that the costs of litigation are comparatively lower than those of law courts because of the efficient way in which the investigations and the hearing are conducted. The third advantage is that the process and decision making is speedy; this saves time. Law courts usually take longer time to listen to and determine cases. The other advantage is that the administrative hearing gives the agency an...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Court System and the Judicial Process

...the lawsuit is prepared; and secondly, both plaintiff and defendant should have an opportunity to substantiate their interests and defend themselves. The other essential characteristics of the U.S. court process are clarity, independence of judges, attention to each aspect of evidence and the right for application to higher judicial institutions for an appropriate review. Courtroom process also involves the participation of a lawyer, or a person who represents the litigant's (or defendant's) interests, criminal cases necessitate the presence of a public prosecutor, who explains the nature of the case to judges and requires certain penalty, and witnesses, or individuals,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The Texas Judicial System

...and civil matters. The judge of the constitutional court has legislative and executive functions and serves the term of four years. The statutory county courts have jurisdiction over civil, family and criminal matters, even though it varies throughout the state. District courts are trial courts and have jurisdiction over the criminal cases involving divorces, land, elections and other civil matters. The jurisdiction of the district courts cannot be changed by the legislation, even though the non-constitutional courts have limited jurisdiction. District courts also have criminal and civil jurisdiction, but in some big cities their exercise is divided into civil, family and criminal...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Judicial restraint and judicial activism

...Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism The doctrine of judicial activism is based on the belief that the federal judiciary is supposed to take an active function by utilizing its powers to examine the activities of the state legislatures, administrative agencies, and the Congress (this is in the case where the aforementioned government bodies go beyond their authority). The Supreme Court acted in an activist manner in the period between 1953 and 1969, and this is in an era when Chief Justice Earl Warren headed the Court. The Warren Court instigated the civil rights onward by suggesting that the laws allowing racial segregation were in violation of the equal protection clause (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley 459). On the other hand... , the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Judicial Process Article Review

...criminal acts if committed by persons considered to be adults. In general the terms are exclusively defined by the age limit. Most state laws stipulate that youths accused of violation of the law before reaching the age of eighteen years are to be subjected to juvenile courts original jurisdiction, however, the youths accused of violation of the law after or on the day of their eighteenth birthdays have to be processed and subjected to the adult criminal justice process. Some states in the US define the juvenile-adult transition at seventeenth birthday, and some few states define the line of transition at sixteen years of age. Generally, states have laid down transfer procedure laws that govern or call...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

The State Judicial Selection Process

...seventy five years in Texas but be less than seventy years in Florida. This is to say that there is a five year age difference between Texas and Florida. In the same line of thought and respect, it would be fair to asset that judges in Texas retire at an older age of seventy five compared to seventy years of Florida. Another difference that cannot escape attention is the fact that in Florida, a prospective judge must be an eligible elector in the judicial processes and matters. Tentatively, the selection criterion in Texas requires that a popular vote by the general public is involved in the selection of the judges while the state of Florida does not require partisanship in the selection...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Litigating a tax matter--the judicial process for FREE!

Contact Us