Master Plan Evaluation - Term Paper Example

Master Plan Evaluation Master Plan Evaluation The master plans reviewed were that of Kansas and PortlandInternational Airport. Both of the two airports had various similarities and differences in matters related to landside access, vehicle circulation, and efficiency. The following information illustrates this similarities and differences on the mentioned areas on both of the two airports.Landside AccessSimilarities One of the similarities is that in both of the two airports, the arriving and departing passengers are separated in the area with the landside access (Richard de Neufville & Odoni, 2003).

The other similarity is that landsides in both of the two airports are build with the new improved facilities that giving the airports a high technological advancement. The other similarity is that the landsides in both airports meet the recommended curb capacity. Moreover, landsides in both of the two airports provide easy access to future mass transit system (Richard de Neufville & Odoni, 2003). Differences Various differences emerge on the issue of landsides in both airports. One of the differences is that in the Kansas City, the landside accommodates southern landside access (Richard de Neufville & Odoni, 2003).

However, Portland International accommodates both the southern and southern east landsides. The other established difference in matters related to landside is that the Kansas City landside provides effective to access roads. However, the landside in Portland International Airport required certain changes and improvements in order to provide effective to access roads (Richard de Neufville & Odoni, 2003). Vehicle CirculationSimilarities One of the similarities is that in both of the two airports, there are in-terminal circulations of vehicles within the airport.

The other similarity is there are designated areas where vehicles are required to drop or pick passengers within the airport. The other similarity in matters related to vehicle circulation is that in both of the two airports, there are designated areas for parking vehicles for the all the staff members and customers.Differences One of the established differences in both of the two airports is that there are a number of growths in relation to roadway capacity to facilitate effective vehicle circulation in Portland International Airport.

Some of these growth issues include freeway interchange, airport access roads and terminal roadway. However, there are no such improvements identified in Kansa City Airport. The other main difference between the two airports is limited expansion capability in the main terminal of Kansas City Airport. However, Portland International Airport seems to have a high expansion capability in matters related to its main terminals. EfficiencySimilarities One of the similarities in matters related to efficiency in both of the two airports is that the curb length in both of the two airports is sufficient.

This means that congestion is not possible to occur in both of the airports. The other similarity is that both of the two airports have terminals located to places where various services are offered within the airports. This means that passengers do not spend much time while making long walking distances to the terminals. The other similarity is that in both of the two airports, there are various equipments put in place to assist both able and disabled clients. Differences One of the differences in matters related to efficiency is that in Portland Airport, there are a number of roadway monitoring stations.

Moreover, there are a number of new established technological projects. Some of these projects include pay-on-foot. Even though, there are also various improved technological issues in Kansas City Airport, Portland seems to be ahead in matters related to clients’ well-being while undertaking various services in the airport. ReferencesRichard de Neufville, R. L., & Odoni, A. R. (2003). Airport systems, planning, design, and management (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.