Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Collaboration and Peer Reviews - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Some people like to participate in group work, while others prefer to work alone. There are many advantages to working together on a group project. First of all, because more…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.2% of users find it useful
Collaboration and Peer Reviews
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Collaboration and Peer Reviews"

Collaboration and Peer Reviews Collaborating on a project requires team members to work together towards one common goal or objective. Some people like to participate in group work, while others prefer to work alone. There are many advantages to working together on a group project. First of all, because more than one person is involved, a wider range of ideas can be put forward. Each team member will have their own personal views about how to complete a project, so if each person can share their thoughts with the group, a much better method can be come up with. The group can take the plus points out of a number of people’s opinions to form one way of getting the job done. Also, a project can be completed much faster when collaborating because each team member can focus just on what they are good at. Working as an individual requires someone to be involved in every role; group work means that each person can specialize. On the other hand, collaboration on a project means that some people may slack off because they think that others will do the work for them. Some people are just naturally lazy, so being part of a group allows them to receive a grade that they don’t deserve. Another disadvantage to working as a group is that there can be disagreements among group members. A famous saying that shows this is “too many cooks spoil the broth.” The same can sometimes be true in collaborating on a project—everyone thinks that they know what is best for the group and they try to impose their views on others. No one is willing to compromise and, as a result, the project turns out to be a disaster.
By reviewing my peers’ writing, I have been able to get different views on how to write a paper. Everyone has a different style when it comes to writing, so to learn from someone else’s style can benefit my own writing. Of course, some of my peers’ writing may not be up to scratch; this is where I can offer advice and hopefully improve their writing ability. In doing this, I can think through the thought processes that go into writing and I can adapt my style so that I am a better writer in the long term.
The good thing about getting my papers reviewed by my peers is that hopefully they will pick up on something that I may have missed. Because they have attended most of the classes with me, they have been taught the same writing principles that I have. Sometimes, another person can catch something that I haven’t because they are reading it with fresh eyes. A negative to having my peers review my papers is that they perhaps do not have a writing ability that is equal to mine. In this case, they can offer very little to me, and in fact may even point me in the wrong direction. Thought they may have the best intentions, their reviewing ability may not contribute anything to my paper at all. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Collaboration and Peer Reviews Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Collaboration and Peer Reviews Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1. Retrieved from
(Collaboration and Peer Reviews Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1)
Collaboration and Peer Reviews Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1.
“Collaboration and Peer Reviews Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Collaboration and Peer Reviews

Collaboration and Peer Reviews

... that might have been better worded originally, simply to suit the preference of my peer reviewer, which might not be the preference of a wider audience. Collaboration has many advantages and disadvantages, but the essential fact is that it is simply a fact of life. There is no way to avoid collaborating on projects, and most of the time the project would be worse if one did not collaborate with someone else, to get other points of view and ideas that may not be apparent. So the task is to maximise the advantages while minimizing the disadvantages, all while keeping in mind that each person’s ideas need to be treated with respect, but also with some amount of caution.... reviewing my peers work is how much...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Peer reviews lesson plans

...Peer Reviews Lesson Plans Lesson plans are written in different formats, and they depict different ideas depending on the lesson or topic at hand. The differences in lesson plans would also be initiated by the variations in learning goals and objectives that a class wishes to achieve through their teacher. Other than the aim of structuring the lesson plan, differences would be caused by errors and other problems encountered in writing the lesson plan. Different sections of lesson plans have varying difficulties. All the sections can hardly be conceptualized in a smooth way. It may be easy to point out what is required of the plan in each section providing the rational for the same section could be a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Peer Reviews of Opinion Papers

...of the topic in discussion. More rationale should however have been provided to really convince the reader that the issue under discussion is a problem that needs to be addressed. The rationale though good as it is lacks enough justifications through evidences from researches or literature review and hence seems vague enough. After having a bit of trouble with the introduction section, the writer has done a good and commendable job on the body part of the discussion. Integration of references in the discussion which are supporting literature of the discussion has been integrated. With the references indicated, it is evident that the writer did an extensive literature review of the topic under discussion...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Do Peer Reviews on prewriting work for The Odyssey

...Peer reviews on prewriting work for the odyssey WORKSHEET FOR PREWRITING PEER REVIEW REVIEWER________________________________ MATE_______________________________ by Johnni Arnold  The style of writing I have chosen was free writing under the theme of tragedy portrayed in The Odyssey by Homer. What elements of the adventures caused death and pain or suffering for the main character; the mass homicide of the crews being eaten by the Cyclops? The main character Ulysses together with his team constantly found themselves in many instances of mysterious adventures that inflicted great sufferings, pain and death to some members of the crew. They prevalent Greek wars, attacks...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Peer Reviewed

...Peer Review Process The peer review process is a process that allows the critique of research papers by fellow colleagues in the same field. Apart from this it allows for credentialing of organization and companies allowing people to earn jobs, learn about the organization, and recognize its contribution towards its designated field of study. This paper looks at the peer review process at Cancer Treatment Centers of America and the ways in which it is similar to other organizations. It then looks at ways in which it can be improved. It finally looks at the way the process can be used in credentialing organizations, ensuring quality health...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay


...Art, Exhibition and Film Reviews By + Exhibition Review: Mix Summer Show The of the exhibitionunder review is the Mix Summer Show, which is a biannual show program that celebrates and highlights the breadth of the artistes that associate with the gallery (, n.d., n.p). The venue of the exhibition was the Lawrence Alkin Gallery. It brought together the original artworks of both street and contemporary artists like Copyright, David Walker, Ben Eine, Mr. Brainwash and Ryan Callanan (, n.d., n.p.). The show also featured collage artistes Maria Rivers and Bonnie and Clyde. The setting of the gallery showed the detailed design of the building, which helped display the artwork strategically, with lighting... more than...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay


...Collaboration EHSA is a human services agency that seeks to improve the lives of by offering satisfactory and positive impacting human services interventions to various issues that the clients may be prone to. As a human services agency, it seeks to help the clients deal effectively with life-disrupting occurrences such as stress, crisis, or any changes to their lives (Rosenthal, 2012). EHSA began this cause because it wanted to bring change to the people and ensure they were relieved from all that was disturbing them. Similarly, the cause was essential in making the people realize the change that they could believe in and enjoy the fruits. However, this mission would never be achieved owing to the situation in the...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Complete Research Paper Drafts and Peer Reviews

..., the e-book which has significantly lowered book transport costs. 2. Literature Review This research looked at the carious reources that have been written relative to the study. A research by Kennedy (2009) provides information on the effects of using this criterion of electronic publishing. It is much useful in that it gives detailed information on the future of publishers and librarians who are applying the idea of electronic publishing. Kennedy predicts that the internet will ultimately change the various positions held by different players in the industry and that some will have to be eliminated or fit themselves in the expanded market. Contrary, Otuoma (2002) predicts that the future market for the publishing...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Peer reviews and population page

...Diabetes in US According to American diabetes Association , the estimated cost of diabetes in the US in is $245 billionwhich include direct medical costs and $69 billion dollars with regard to reduced productivity. Of these, the highest cost is for hospital inpatient care which stands at 43% and the lowest is nursing residential facility which stands at 8%. The average cost for medical bills for people diagnosed with diabetes is about $13,700 per year which is way higher than the average person without diabetes. Increased absenteeism is one of the major issues that make diabetes patients to have a reduced productivity. However this is not the same for all ethnic groups. White Hispanics have the lowest numbers while African... in US According...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Peer To Peer Lending Scheme

...PEER TO PEER LENDING SCHEME PEER TO PEER LENDING SCHEME Introduction Group Lending Club (GLC) primary aim is the implementation of a peer to peer lending system that is more technology driven. They strive to implement and use new software that will be developed by London Agile (LA). Task 1: The role of the Workshop Facilitator and how this role relates to the GLC scenario Campbell McBain is an administrator at Group lending club is and is willing to work as a workshop facilitator. A facilitator is the person who has no decision-making authority, his primary role is to help the group identify and solve problems. The facilitator...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Collaboration and Peer Reviews for FREE!

Contact Us