Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Brief a case - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
He appealed his conviction and sentence in the Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Facts: The appellant was arrested and charged…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Brief a case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Brief a case"

Bell v Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, 2003 Legal History: The appellant was convicted and sentenced on a charge of attempted kidnapping in the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida. He appealed his conviction and sentence in the Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Facts: The appellant was arrested and charged with attempted kidnapping after the victim, who was hysterical, telephoned the police. Once the police responded to the victim’s telephone call, it took up to twenty minutes for the victim to calm down enough to make a statement. In her statement, the victim reported that she had been approached by the appellant from his van as she walked along the street earlier in the day. The appellant offered to take her to where she was going. She did not accept the offer and continued walking. She then saw the victim standing next to his van. The appellant took the victim by the neck at gun point in an attempt to get her into his van against her will. However, the victim was able to free herself and ran home, where she telephoned the police.
Legal Issues: Did the trial err in its decision to allow the victim’s hearsay statement via a police officer under the hearsay exception relative to excited utterances?
Holding: The judgment of the lower court was affirmed and therefore the appellant’s appeal was dismissed.
Legal Reasoning: Pursuant to Florida Statute Section 90.803(2) (2001), an excited utterance is an exception to the rule against hearsay when the statement/excited utterance relates to a “startling event or condition” and is made while the maker of the statement/excited utterance “is under duress” (Bell v State, 2003). An excited utterance is made when the event causing excitement is “startling enough to cause excitement” (Bell v State, 2003). The statement is required to have been made “before there was time to contrive or misrepresent” (Bell v State, 2003). The statement must also be made when the speaker is “under the stress of excitement caused by the event” (Bell v State, 2003). In order to be an excited utterance, it is not necessary for the statement be made in a manner contemporaneous to the event causing excitement. All that is necessary for establishing an excited utterance is that the speaker is excited when the statement is made. Pursuant to Section 90.803(2) an excited state of mind may persist for a while following the event. It is for the court to determine whether or not the statement was made in an excited state. In determining whether or not the speaker made the statement in an excited state of mind the court may consider the speaker’s age, mental and physical conditions, the event itself and the contents of the statement. According to the responding officer’s evidence, the victim was clearly hysterical and scared when he arrived at her home. She was too upset to speak initially. Thus the trial court was at liberty to conclude that the victim’s state of mind was one of duress and excitement emanating from the event that she described to the officer. Even if the judge had erred, the error did not cause irreversible harm since the victim testified, providing the appellant with ample opportunities to cross-examine the victim relative to the veracity of the statement given to the police.
United States v Napier
Court of Appeal, 9th Circuit, 1975
Legal History: The appellant was convicted by a jury on four counts of interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle pursuant to 18 USC Section 2312 known as the Dyer Act and one count of interstate kidnapping pursuant to 18 USC Section 1201 known as the Lindbergh Act. The appellant appealed against his conviction.
Facts: The appellant was alleged to have kidnapped a woman in Oregon and taken her to Washington and had driven the victim’s stolen car to Oregon again. The evidence revealed that the victim was discovered unconscious, suffering from serious head injuries near Vancouver, Washington. A broken firearm was discovered near her body and her blood and hair were matched to blood and hair found on the weapon’s hammer. The appellant’s fingerprints were found on the weapon’s barrel. Tire tracks near the scene matched those of the victim’s car. The car was subsequently recovered in Oregon. The appellant’s fingerprints were found on the victim’s car and his personal documents were also discovered in the victim’s purse which was found in the victim’s car. The victim was admitted into hospital and had brain surgery and was said to have suffered brain damage and was therefore incapable of testifying. Her sister testified that a week following the victim’s release from the hospital she was shown a newspaper article with the appellant’s picture. The victim’s immediate reaction was to point at the appellant’s picture and state in “great distress and horror and upset”, “he killed me, he killed me” (US v Napier, 1975).
Legal Issues: Did the court err in allowing an out-of-court statement by the victim into evidence as a “spontaneous exclamation” and thus an exception to the rule against hearsay? (US v Napier, 1975).
Holding: The appellant’s appeal is without merit and was accordingly dismissed and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.
Legal Reasoning: The court expressed the view that the statement allegedly made by the victim fall within the hearsay exception of either an excited utterance of a spontaneous exclamation. Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 803(2) any statement relative to a “startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition” is an exception to the rule against hearsay (US v Napier, 1975). The appellant argued that the statement was made in reference to the assault and therefore was not a spontaneous exclamation. The court reasoned however, that the victim’s statement was made in response to the appellant’s photograph and that was the qualifying startling event, thus the statement was a spontaneous exclamation. Therefore the victim’s statement in response to the photograph is sufficient to constitute the spontaneous exclamation exception to the rule against hearsay. Although spontaneous exclamations usually apply to accidents, assaults and such events, it is not restricted to these types of incidents. The court will look at the specific facts and circumstance of the case. Since the victim had not previously discussed the assault with her family, her response to the appellant’s photograph would amount to a spontaneous exclamation. She was “unexpectedly” shown a picture of the man who assaulted her and thus her response was spontaneous and not one that could be said to have been contrived. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Brief a case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2”, n.d.)
Brief a case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2. Retrieved from
(Brief a Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 2)
Brief a Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 2.
“Brief a Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 2”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Brief a Case

... Brief Case Review The case number 248 NY 339, Helen Palsgraf, the Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Long Island Railroad Company, the Defendant-Appellant, was argued from February 24, 1928 and decided on May 29, 1928. In this case, the defendant moved to court and filed an appeal to reverse the decision of Supreme Court in the second Judicial Department of New York by asserting that the plaintiff, Palsgraf, failed to prove that her injury was foreseeable (Cardozo 1). In the previous history of the case, the plaintiff, Palsgraf, lodged a complaint against Long Island Railway Company, the defendant, asserting that the defendant was liable for her injuries that befell her as she was standing on a railroad stage. The injuries occurred from falling...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Brief a case

... Case: Rosenzweig vs. givens Facts: Background between the parties Rosenzweig and Givens had been in a romantic relationship for some time. However, the relationship ended, and there arose a dispute over the purchase of a condominium apartment. Why is there a dispute? Rosenzweig started an action to close on two mortgages that he claimed to have issued to Givens in 2002. He said that he had loaned her $285000 to purchase the property. At the time the mortgage was issued to Givens, the two were in a romantic relationship (Larkson, Miller, and Cross 294). Rosenzweig paid the down payment of the property that he now claims it was a mortgage. He also claimed to have incurred many household expenses with regard to the apartment. Givens claims...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Analysis of Trust Law Case

Once the court is satisfied that the “declarant had the requisite intention it will strive to validate it.”3 Certainty of intention will therefore be the most important element for determining whether or not the letter constitutes an enforcable trust.

Assuming that the trust held by the trustees under the father’s will trust in favor of Sally and the trust agreement in respect of the horse are valid trusts the question of cetainties are not valid except to the extent that a new trust is created in favor of Sally’s children and thereby extinguishing the previous trusts. This is particularly so with respect to the will trust. The trust agreement over the horse only involves the disposition of a ben...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework

Analysis of the Case of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders Association Ltd

There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

The Idea of Liberty in Sam Slime Case

... Sam Slime This could certainly be the case of the rich get richer and the poor go to jail, especially in a country that is trying to serve many masters. The government of the United States is certainly a political and governmental entity, but at it heart it has almost always been a voice of corporate business and expansion of wealth for the few. It operates seemingly under the principle guise of what is good for business is good for the people. One could say that the state of the economy today is the fallout of this mindset. In the “Sam Slime” case study we see the idea of liberty as applied by several masters. The first, when Sam Slime mugs you outright is a matter for governmental law and order. Cleary there is a criminal (Sam...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Business Ethics in the Case of Timberland-City Year

The purpose of this study is to focus on the ethical considerations and dilemmas faced by the organization Timberland in terms of its coalition to City-Year and the steps that are taken and should be taken for the solution of those ethical issues.

In the merger of the two organizations, Timberland and City Year, there are many ethical considerations. To develop legal business relationships between Timberland and City Year and to consider the stipulations of the required business laws, the following ethical considerations should be deemed:
  • None of City Year’s earnings should be incurred to any private shareholder or an individual.
  • City Year cannot participate in any political campaign or...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Case of Fisher v Brooker

Fisher first filed his claim in 1993, some of the laws applicable to this case have undergone considerable amendments. However, based on the shreds of evidence presented under this case, we can clearly see that the House of Lords dealt with this case properly and that the judges made extensive analysis and thorough evaluation of the issues at hand. To get a clear picture of how the House of Lords decided this case, let us take a look at the different issues involved in this case and how these issues were resolved.

There are at least seven issues raised by the parties in this case. These issues were as follows: (1) whether or not a fair trial is possible in this case considering the time between the composition of the wo...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Ethical Conflicts in the Case

Both the procedures of sterilization have some risks and ethically a doctor should make his/ her patient aware of the circumstances. In this case, Ms. Judy who is 24 years old is also facing the same issue when her doctor is ready to operate her without informing her as her guardians believed that would not be able to look after an infant and are concerned that any child resulting from the relationship might also have an intellectual disability so basically it is a case of involuntary sterilization which according to (Pollack, 1979),” is an invasion of a women’s bodily integrity and identity for ends that usually accommodate the need of others in disregard of her own needs and that pre-empt her bodily self-determinatio...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Business Law: MAD-IDEA Case

Before a claim can be filed, however, Justine must establish the following conditions: a comparator of the opposite sex; the comparator performs the same kind of work as Justine, and; the comparator is employed by the same company as Justine’s (Blanpain et al, p.56). Evidently, all these conditions are already met by Justine with Thomas easily filling in the role of the comparator, as he is not only of the opposite sex but also an input data worker like Justine employed by MAD-IDEA.

Justine could either claim under “like work,” “work rated as equivalent,” or “work of equal value.” A claim under the “like work” provision of the Equal Pay Act 1970 is laid down in s 1(2...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Brief a case for FREE!

Contact Us